Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 13
December 13[edit]
Template:Medical schools in Ireland[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was userfy. There is consensus that we shouldn't block working on this template, but that in its current state without a parent article and few working links it shouldn't be in template space and transcluded in to main space just yet. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Only links to two articles and doesn't have a mother article. ...William 21:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - I am working on a mother article and other related articles. --GeneralBelly (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy: AGF and move back to template space when ready. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy per PotW —PC-XT+ 03:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Animal attacks in Australia[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as a misleading remnant of an unfortunate episode Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Template first of all doesn't have a mother article. Second of all, half the articles in it are either about the animal or fauna, they being attacks particular to Australia being just a minor part. ...William 15:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: this appears to be the last remnant of an infamous series of "when animals attack" articles that was discussed with great mirth at the Australian Noticeboard a few years ago. Each individual article has been deemed to be not-notable enough for an article, so the navbox has no reason to exist. The-Pope (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Most links are not specific to Australia, therefore misleading and overkill. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Fredrikstad FK[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete, with expansion from a useless to a useful navigational aide taking place
- Template:Fredrikstad FK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per WP:NENAN only two links. Not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, not enough links to be useful. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I updated the navbox to include more relevant links. Five blue-links, the rest are red but are all plausible articles. In addition season articles could be created for recent years in the top league (possibly all seasons since 2003). Arsenikk (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Flickr image inline link[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) —PC-XT+ 05:28, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Flickr image inline link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Flickr tag inline link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Flickr tag inline link with Template:Flickr image inline link.
The two templates are similar. Can they be combined? --evrik (talk) 06:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: I think not, one is for individual images, the other tags. I've renamed them accordingly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: neither template is tagged for discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Either close as withdrawn or tag the templates for further discussion. evrik, would you be ok with withdrawing this, so it can close, or did you want further discussion? —PC-XT+ 03:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Renaming was probably a better idea. Withdrawn. --evrik (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.