Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 7
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Userpage blue border short (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Userpage blue border short rounded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Unencycpage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:User page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Userpage blue border short, Template:Userpage blue border short rounded and Template:Unencycpage with Template:User page.
Template:User page/sandbox can now support the short style with the parameter |short=yes. See Template:User page/testcases for examples. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support merge no need for multiple templates if one can do the same work. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support, sounds good; thanks for your work consolidating these. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per above rationale. Good work and great idea. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: Same as my down comment. Empire AS Talk! 12:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: I'm always onboard to eliminate redundant templates, especially once parameters are added to the main one to implement the behaviors that inspired the creation of the sister templates in the first place. – voidxor 16:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge As noted above, redundancy is best eliminated. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge with prejudice: There is existing documentation on {{User Page}} on how to produce alternate versions. Seeing as similar merges have already occurred, this feels like WP:SNOWPRO. SpurriousCorrelation 09:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 15:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support merge Best, MTATransitFanChat! 00:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge. Agreed. --Bsherr (talk) 18:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Usertalkpage (rounded) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Usertalkpage blue border (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Userpage Blue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
After Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 12#Template:User page rounded and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 28#Template:Usertalkpage {{User page}} supports both these styles and usage on talk pages. There is nothing to merge, just a simple replace. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: Only a single template is sufficient when it supports all the styles. Empire AS Talk! 02:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support, sounds good. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per above rationale. Great idea. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: As above, only a single template is sufficient when it supports all the styles. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: Only one template is necessary. LynwoodF (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge, meaning substitute and delete. Agreed. --Bsherr (talk) 18:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 14. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:The_Sketches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Pointless template. Parent article doesn't exist, and only 1 link (to an article that I've nominated for AFD) Joseph2302 (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. One link can't navigate to anywhere. --Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).