Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 August 5
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
No longer necessary as all the templates the footer was transcluding was deleted on July 29 and July 31. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:3RoundBracket-Byes-ThirdPlace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:3RoundBracket-Byesnoseeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to {{3RoundBracket-Byes}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 21:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:8TeamBracket-with fifth-seventh no third (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:8TeamBracket-with third-fifth-seventh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:8TeamBracket-with third-fifth-seventh-NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to {{8TeamBracket-Consols}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 02:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. {{8TeamBracket-Consols}} lacks the thicker borders featured in the three nominees that are employed to help the "main" rounds stand out. I believe this is a great visual feature to instantly highlight the difference between the main and consolation rounds. I therefore propose either keeping the nominees or altering {{8TeamBracket-Consols}} to adopt the thicker borders. – TurboGUY (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- @TurboGUY: While not the biggest deal, I think the thick borders are a bit excessive, but I do agree that it helps to differentiate. I've changed the headers colors of the consolation bracket to white, which I believe is sufficient. Do you agree? – Pbrks (t • c) 05:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- I think this is a very fair compromise, thank you.
- I have also noticed that {{8TeamBracket-Consols}} lack the "details" parameters of "{{8TeamBracket-with third-fifth-seventh-NoSeeds}}". This parameter allows for each tie to display additional information underneath such as date, time and location of the match. There is an example in the documentation of "NoSeeds". Again, please consider adding this feature to {{8TeamBracket-Consols}}. Thanks again. – TurboGUY (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @TurboGUY: It does! While not in the doc (I'll update it), the parameters are of the form
|RDn-detailsm=
. – Pbrks (t • c) 16:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)- Ah I see now, brilliant. Thanks for your efforts! – TurboGUY (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @TurboGUY: It does! While not in the doc (I'll update it), the parameters are of the form
- @TurboGUY: While not the biggest deal, I think the thick borders are a bit excessive, but I do agree that it helps to differentiate. I've changed the headers colors of the consolation bracket to white, which I believe is sufficient. Do you agree? – Pbrks (t • c) 05:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Pbrks! You're gonna delete my template and you didn't tell me anything about it. (I am the author of the template {{8TeamBracket-with third-fifth-seventh}}.) I don't like your rounds abbreviations. First round as "RD3"? What a nonsense! It's much more logical in my template: first round as "QF", second round as "SF", etc. So change those labels (for example from RD1 to RD7 if you prefer RDs) and I'll agree with the deletion. Maiō T. (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Maiō T.: Apologies for not notifying you. I disagree that the round names are illogical, they simply correspond to the column. In any event, I added your previous naming convention as acceptable parameter names. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @Pbrks: Hi. Please take a look at the use of the template on Beach soccer at the 2019 World Beach Games – Qualification (CONCACAF) for an example of where it is currently not working properly after consolidating the old templates. 1) The scores of the seventh and third place matches will not display. 2) The details for the fifth place match will not display. 3) The details for the final are incorrectly displaying above the tie rather than below it like all other ties. Thanks for investigating this. – TurboGUY (talk) 04:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- @TurboGUY: Thanks for pointing it out. I was making some changes to the underlying module, and didn't realize that it had broken it. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).