Help desk
< April 24	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 26 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 25

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai Super Kings-Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry

After re-submitting the article for review, because it was declined, should I remove the decline template at the top of the page or let it stay? --Tary123 (talk) 14:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let it stay. It serves as a historical record until the draft is accepted and will let the next reviewer see what the past problems were, making it easier to check whether those issues have been fixed. Huon (talk) 15:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for letting me know! --Tary123 (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Think the problem is u have only made this article about statistics recored. Just write more about this rivalry and why it was made such big rivalry like season 2 semifinal knockout or a fan burning csk flag. and few close matches in season 5 and 6. Only by writing atleast 2 paragraphs will be good. For reference check Dodgers-giants rivalry. new York Yankees- mets, Chicago cubs- white sox rivalry and write it. Good luck you can bring a best article. Also try to write something about Mumbai Indians - Chennai super kings rivalry too. I think it is much bigger than RCB-CSK rivalry

The Word Network on Wikipedia

To whom it may concern,

I am the web manager for "The Word Network" and wanted to look into the reason behind why our wikipedia page was deleted from your site?

I have looked through your recent changes and have found nothing on where, why and when this page was deleted?

We are the largest Urban and Gospel Channel in the United States and broadcast via cable, Direct TV, Verizon fios, AT&T Uverse into over 88 million homes. We are now broadcasting in over 200 countries world wide via satellite. Our audience depends on the information we had up on your site and demand that we figure out what happened to "The Word Network" wikipedia page ASAP.

Kindly,

Storyofthebrad (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why your posting here as the article in question doesn't seem to have come through the Articles for Creation process, however I will answer your question.

The article The Word Network was deleted from Wikipedia in November 2012 because it was a copyright infringement. See WP:Copyrights for information on what is and isn't allowed. Every entry has to follow certain guidelines and policies, the overriding one being the general notability guideline, specifically WP:CORP for this entry. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Raines (dPhil)

Take another look. It's a hoax. The accomplishments are impossible. Check the dates for Meischer, Kossel, Levene and Astbury, or the imdb ref, or the one to Watson & Crick. DGG ( talk ) 18:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying it got declined for the wrong reasons? If you feel it's a blatant hoax, see WP:CSD#G3. Huon (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]