Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 May 22
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < May 21 | << Apr | May | Jun >> | May 23 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
May 22
[edit]01:12:33, 22 May 2015 review of submission by Thewizardsgirl
[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lance_Sussman
I am requesting a re-review here as of the article above as the original editor Onel5969 is on a break - very understandable.
The original decline was due to notability - a valid decline. Therefore the new version has substantial additions in the area of other reliable articles that review the person's work, or contain biographical information. Nearly all of this person's published works are peer reviewed - either in the traditional double blind editorial review of journals or in the Encyclopedia aspect that the author was solicited by an academic editor due to notoriety in the field in which the article is eventually written, reviewed, edited and published. Many of his original writings are cited in subsequent publications - some of which are noted in the revised article.
Additionally, I removed a picture which was not properly cited and am working on getting a quality photo which can be substantiated.
This article will support and be linked to many articles in this subject area - and some of those need corrections and updating which I will work through after this article posts. In my research, I have kept track of a number of things - wikipedia and otherwise - that need a 'tweak'.
I am requesting a re-review here as of the article above, as the original editor Onel5969 is on a break - very understandable.
Thank you for your prompt consideration - I look forward to many more opportunities to participate in the Wikipedia Community. Thewizardsgirl (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Thewizardsgirl Thewizardsgirl (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Thewizardsgirl: never worry that an original reviewer is away. There is a team of volunteers who all review work that has been submitted. There is also a large backlog currently. What I can say is that it will be reviewed, but not necessarily in a timescale you wish for. Fiddle Faddle 08:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The existing article at Walter Russell, which has stood for 9 years, is inaccurate and defamatory despite numerous edits. It needs to be replaced. See Chazhardy, Sandbox.Chazhardy (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Chazhardy (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Please feel free to edit that article. This is how Wikipedia works. Fiddle Faddle 16:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
17:17:36, 22 May 2015 review of submission by Allen Leo Johnston
[edit]
Allen Leo Johnston (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Please tell me what I am doing wrong for all of my article submissions are being deleted. The one that I currently submitted were written about allen johnston he is worthy of being in WIKI. He follows the same format as clive davis and still there is a deletions request.
If I am doing it wrong then please explain to me what the format you are currently accepting at this time. step one name
step two early years
step three current status
step four articles of achievements and awards and representation with the years internet pages for references have been submitted
NOW WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH THIS SUBMISSION LIKE THIS WHEN I DO IT LIKE THE STEPS. Bold text
WHAT ARE THE STEPS, LIKE iM A CHILD BREAK IT DOWN FOR ME OK PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.
CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME CREATE THIS ARTICLE FOR ALLEN LEO JOHNSON BY APPROVING EACH PARAGRAPH THAT I SUBMIT TO YOU TO BE PLACED IN THE ARTICLE.
- @Allen Leo Johnston:You describe Allen Leo Johnston as an "unsung hero". In order to be included in Wikipedia, a subject must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Without such sources, Johnston is not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not for promotion or "getting the word out". Worldbruce (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Allen Leo Johnston: Whatever your message, using block capitals and boldface text does not commend it to anyone who reads it. Please take a pause, think about how you have said what you have said, and come back when you can say it well and behave in a far less combative manner. You should take that time to read WP:GNG. Fiddle Faddle 21:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
23:49:26, 22 May 2015 review of draft by CoolXG
[edit]
The title of this draft is supposed to be Hal Wars Units(Add On To "Halo Wars" by PureLegend). I know it is minor, but I don't want to have to type article all over again. Is it possible you or me could change the name?
CoolXG (talk) 23:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @CoolXG: Before changing the title, you may want to review Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games) to make sure the title follows recommended guidelines. You may also find Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games and their Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines useful. When you're sure of a great title, Wikipedia:Moving a page will tell you all you ever wanted to know about how to change a title. Worldbruce (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)