User talk:Chazhardy

Talk pages

Hi. I noticed you erased the whole Walter Russell talk page. Please do not do that without moving the discussion to an archive page (I did it for you). Drmab (talk) 20:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it about time the Walter Russell article was newly rated? Those of us who worked on it have met all the criteria.Chazhardy (talk) 02:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you request an assessment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmab (talk • contribs) 21:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation

I read the Walter Russell page with interest, and I upgraded it from 'Start' to 'C'. I would have gone for a 'B' if it had been illustrated with some of Russell's works. Surely there's something out of copyright, or a person's own photo of one or more of the works. It's hard to evaluate an artist without seeing his art. --Vicedomino (talk) 12:40, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: File 167 1057 png Might of Ages (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:File 167 1057 png Might of Ages and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:File 167 1057 png Might of Ages, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chazhardy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:File 167 1057 png Might of Ages

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:File 167 1057 png Might of Ages, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can you be so arrogant? Walter Russell conceived of a new Periodic Chart of the Elements in 1926 and you think it is pseudoscience and should not be shown for that reason? You are the arbitors of knowledge?Talk about the evils of the establishment!Chazhardy (talk) 02:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't censor pseudoscience. We do however cover it with WP:DUE due weight, which usually means that pseudoscience is due very little weight. Walter Russell's article has already been to the fringe theories noticeboard (see this thread) where it was resoundingly established as pseudoscience. That doesn't mean we don't cover Russell, it just means we don't give credence to his more out there ideas. I suggest you take the above warning seriously, as you would not be the first person to be sanctioned because of Walter Russell or pseudoscience. But if you are willing to follow policy (i.e. be WP:CIVIL and use reliable sources, among others) I would be happy to work with you to improve Russell's article, as it is in bad shape. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest on Wikipedia

I only looked briefly but I don't think you have received this standard message yet. Considering this declaration it may be relevant so I'll post it. That's from about a year ago, but I'm not up to date yet with that talk page.

Hello, Chazhardy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 10:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]