Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 6
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 5 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 7 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 6
[edit]05:13:43, 6 April 2019 review of submission by Deliriumone
[edit]- Deliriumone (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Deliriumone (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
05:13:43, 6 April 2019 review of submission by Deliriumone
hey i want to know why my page didn't get accepted?
- Hi Deliriumone. The reason is explained in the big pink box on Draft:Delirium and the corresponding big yellow box on your talk page. In short, the topic is not notable (doesn't satisfy the the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia). As their career progresses, that may change. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
05:54:29, 6 April 2019 review of draft by Lily.rayyan
[edit]- Lily.rayyan (talk · contribs)
Lily.rayyan (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
I need to know if the artocle is good?
I need to complete it
- Hi Lily.rayyan. The draft does not meet Wikipedia's needs. The posting on NASDAQ.com is a press release, which does not help demonstrate notability because it is not independent. The reliability of swedishstartupspace.com and venturemagazine.me is unclear, but the former is trivial coverage of a round of capital raising, which does not help demonstrate notability. Searches of about ten English and Arabic news sources in the region found only one more press release on alawaba.com and a brief mention in a list of startups in The Jordan Times. That degree of coverage is insufficient to justify an encyclopedia article. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
15:14:59, 6 April 2019 review of draft by Dylan Malyasov
[edit]
Dylan Malyasov (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Please i'm trying to get this person (Shatta Rako) Full Biography on Google so i needed to write them here.But unfortunately the content couldn't meet your requirement.Please helpme get his Biography here.
Michael Owusu Ansah (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has no interest in getting people on Google, your draft is about a person who is not notable and is a copyright violation so has been tagged for deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
17:37:45, 6 April 2019 review of submission by Jessarchivetn
[edit]Hi, I recently took over the drafting of the Dylan Walshe page. I run a fan page of the artist & started to create this article. I have gone through many other artist entries & Walshe would have considerably more achievements & sourcing than a lot of lesser known artists I read about on there. The feedback I get from editors varies so much & just seems random at times. Was wondering if you could maybe take a look & advice me on how to complete it? Walshe has done several notable & major tours. Has released several records & has worked & recorded with some of the biggest names within his genres. Thank you
Jessarchivetn (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Jessarchivetn. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or that it is welcome. So generally it isn't productive to compare a draft to other pages. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best.
- Different reviewers have different strengths and may focus on different things. The common thread in comments so far is that the draft's sourcing is weak. Quality is far more important than quantity. If you're finding the formal rules difficult to come to grips with, WP:GOLDENRULE and WP:THREE may help. I've made more specfic suggestions on the draft itself. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)