Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 29
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 28 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 30 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 29
[edit]07:38:15, 29 September 2019 review of submission by 103.59.75.30
[edit]- 103.59.75.30 (talk · contribs)
103.59.75.30 (talk) 07:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
10:12:30, 29 September 2019 review of submission by Bhupeshbb
[edit]
Techno Gravity 10:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Bhupeshbb: please read WP:AUTO and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
13:53:54, 29 September 2019 review of draft by Mrisemin
[edit]
Mrisemin (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Hi! I've made several changes to this article since it was deleted the last time. May I have another review?
- But you haven't removed or replaced the many links to YouTube and IMDb which are not reliable sources and give no support for notability. I have also moved it back to draft as it is not ready for main space yet. Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
14:58:35, 29 September 2019 review of submission by Saruman63
[edit]I don't really understand the issue with my draft's sources/references. The information featured in the article are objective facts about the release and the contents of the album. Why can't I use the official website of the company as the main source then? Subjective things like "the only Ace Of Base compilation you’ll ever need" aren't featured in the draft and compared to other AoB-album-articles in the Wikipedia my draft follows pretty much the same pattern, although there is no "Background"-section or sth like that, just because the album wasn't released yet. Saruman63 (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Saruman63. Some crowdsourced websites, such as Discogs, MusicBrainz, and Rate Your Music, aim to include all albums, but Wikipedia doesn't want an article for every album. It is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection. The encyclopedia only wants articles about things that have attracted significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time.
- The publisher's website is evidence that the company selling the album wants the world to take note of it, but not that it is worthy of note, not that it is notabile (suitable for inclusion here). If the draft is similar to other Ace of Base album articles in this regard, and those articles cannot be improved to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, then they should be deleted. Wikipedia may not be used for advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
17:25:40, 29 September 2019 review of draft by HeadwayNL
[edit]
Requesting help to understand how I can make it more clear that my 'submission for approval' is only to a specific section of an existing article (keukenhof. I decided to start with editing just one section and submit it for review in order to 'start small'. As it's a considerable re-write to what is live now, I thought it best that it first be reviewed by an experienced editor. HeadwayNL (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- We already have an article called Keukenhof and you are free to improve that one, per WP:BOLD Theroadislong (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)