Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 August 29
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 28 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 30 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 29[edit]
03:27:27, 29 August 2021 review of submission by Arjuna Anchan[edit]
Arjuna Anchan (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Arjuna Anchan You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about an organization, but a place to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about one, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
12:16:47, 29 August 2021 review of draft by 2A00:23C5:E389:F401:D145:5712:DA18:9C50[edit]
How can I share new terminology that I’m writing in about in books & journals?
Keen to develop language that helps people better understand role of AI and it’s impact on society.. something I am publishing (and podcasting/speaking) a lot about.
Any advice would be very welcome.
2A00:23C5:E389:F401:D145:5712:DA18:9C50 (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- New & coming things (including termology) is out of scope. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
16:33:39, 29 August 2021 review of submission by IFTEKHAR AHMAD SHEIKH(sanu)[edit]
IFTEKHAR AHMAD SHEIKH(sanu) (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @IFTEKHAR AHMAD SHEIKH(sanu): Greetings. You don’t ask a question, but your draft had been rejected, as the reviewer had determined that there was no hope that this could be improved to the point where it could be considered as an acceptable article. I have tagged the draft for speedy deletion as unambiguously promotional. Wikipedia is not a social media site and is absolutely not the place to post autobiographies, CVs, or any other form of self-promotion. --Finngall talk 17:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
22:48:35, 29 August 2021 review of draft by Citrine01[edit]
My draft has been rejected for reasons that are not clear. Not sure how to proceed. Totally disagree that the subject is not worthy. As one of Australia's oldest sailing clubs and the base for a number of classic yachts I can't understand the objections. I have provide multiple independent links to state government library and newspaper articles etc. Thanks
Citrine01 (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Citrine01: None of the sources in the article demonstrate notability. There's one short piece that says there was a race for women. You will need to find other independent media coverage to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Please see WP:GNG and WP:RS. TechnoTalk (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)