Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 30
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 29 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 31 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 30[edit]
11:01:35, 30 July 2021 review of submission by RASSIOPEIA[edit]
- RASSIOPEIA (talk · contribs)
I have removed the promotional content and added reliable sources, the subject is also mentioned in The New York Times. I think the article is ready to be in mainspace. RASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- RASSIOPEIA The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. We don't want mere mentions, but significant coverage of the subject in independent reliable sources, showing how the company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. If you work for this company, you must make a paid editing declaration. 331dot (talk) 11:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi 331dot (talk, I don't work for the company they just hired me to cleanup the promotional content and submit it for review, I have disclosed my paid edits on my user page. Can you tell me how can I resubmit for review? RASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- RASSIOPEIA If you were hired by them, you work for them even if you are not an employee. A rejection means that the draft may not be resubmitted at this time. If you were hired to get the draft approved and already given money, I'd suggest returning it or otherwise informing them you will be unable to fulfill that directive. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
14:07:14, 30 July 2021 review of submission by 117.222.163.68[edit]
pls help,provided the references 117.222.163.68 (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It appears that the organization does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
15:28:00, 30 July 2021 review of submission by Kmkumbher[edit]
Sher Kumbher ia a famous musical artist from our village, he is notable in hour country pakistan even somewhere in the world also. He has to be on wikipedia, Its my request to create page about Sher Kumbher muscial artist Kmkumbher (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Kmkumbher Unfortunately, he does not seem to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
15:33:17, 30 July 2021 review of submission by Schwartz Jeremy[edit]
Schwartz Jeremy (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Addressed below. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
15:34:57, 30 July 2021 review of submission by Lordmetal666[edit]
- Lordmetal666 (talk · contribs)
It seems that this week, reviewers are not paying attention to the content on the article at all. Please, read it carefully instead of rejecting it simply for cleaning the articles queue.
This article is about a person that is a notable musician with lots of achievements. Thanks.
Lordmetal666 (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lordmetal666 This has nothing to do with clearing out the queue. It appears that this person does not meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable creative professional. The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. If you feel the reviewer erred, you will need to discuss it with them directly. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
How do you guys say this doesn't meet the criteria for a Wikipedia Article? This artist is the responsible for appearing FOUR times in Japanese Music Charts, also being part of a supergroup. This situation is ALL WRONG. Those reviewers are very disruptive on declining articles for nothing. I can see a LOT of people saying the same thing I am. Lordmetal666 (talk) 22:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lordmetal666 Please put follow up comments in this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. As I said, if you feel the reviewer erred, please calmly and civilly discuss it with them. I personally don't disagree with the comments left by reviewers. If he was part of a band, he would not necessarily merit a standalone article. 331dot (talk) 22:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Lordmetal666 All the sources in your draft are about the bands he was in, or just press releases. If you can find coverage of him, then the article might be accepted. Otherwise, all you're doing is barely showing the notability of his bands, so the info can go there. Maybe after the band releases its second album there might be more. If you don't improve the article and keep submitting it, it will be salted and deleted. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
15:46:32, 30 July 2021 review of submission by Schwartz Jeremy[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeremy_Schwartz I am confused simply for no reason rejected. There are sources and they are of high quality. Schwartz Jeremy (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Schwartz Jeremy The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Please review the comments left by reviewers. Note that autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged per the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
15:58:41, 30 July 2021 review of draft by Poems for Parliament[edit]
One of my references is coming up with a date error, I can't work out how to fix it. I would also like to know whether my style is sufficiently impartial as I am explaining a subject that is considered contentious by some, which may be the reason there is no entry for it although the concept has existed for a long time.
Poems for Parliament (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Poems for Parliament: This looks fixed now. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Poems for Parliament: I cleaned up the grammar and tone, and changed second person references to third person. You'll want more sources to demonstrate that this subject deserves its own article (see WP:RS and WP:GNG) or else you'll have to find another article to merge this content into. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
18:04:37, 30 July 2021 review of submission by Mojarra69[edit]
I am not sure why I got routed here. I am trying to get a wiki page set up for my book(s) and I have provided a review that meets your requirement of "This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists,[4] and REVIEWS" The review I included was not of social media, Wiki, or Goodreads. It was provided by a legit review web site called Literary Titan. I believe the page should be created so I can add to it and get started building the wiki links from it Mojarra69 (talk) 18:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Facebook. Goodreads and Amazon are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Mojarra69 The reviewers gave you good info. Besides the sources written by the author himself, there are two blogs, which while questionably reliable, do not demonstrate notability. Pro tip: If you see a link to buy a book on a page, chances are it's not going to help show notability. Without more sourcing, the article will not be accepted. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
23:46:03, 30 July 2021 review of draft by Eric Myer[edit]
I am asking about a submission that was declined. It is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jon_Myer. It appears that I had accidentally added a space in a reference, which a reviewer noticed. I believe that I have remedied this issue, and I have resubmitted the submisssion. Have I handled this properly?