Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 4 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 5

[edit]

Question by Champ Imi model

[edit]

Hello sir How many wikipedia pages have I created? I have also made tea with news articles But they all get deleted within 24 hours Please can tell me what is the issue, why is the page of wikipedia getting deleted?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Champ Imi model (talk • contribs)

@Champ Imi model: Hello and Welcome to the AfC help desk. I am not an administrator and therefore cannot see the deleted revisions, however, according to the deletion reason, they were deleted becuase promotion is forbidden here. You might also be interested in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch, particularely its "Puffery" subsection. If you have further questions, perhaps ask them at the Teahouse rather than here because you have a bigger audience there. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02:59:09, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Akapro990

[edit]

the personality mentioned is a very notable one in North India and is one of the best yoga teachers on the planet. He is loved by almost everyone and only a few people on earth without any wantings and controversies as he is a Jain Monk under the digambara tradition. Pls tell me if I need to do something on my part otherwise please approve this article. Akapro990 (talk) 02:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. No sources, no article, no debate. Your argument above also doesn't help your case. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 03:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:58:33, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Sudjack8

[edit]


My article has declined many times by informing that this is more likely to be an advertisement but its wrong. Please help me to create my first Wikipedia article as approved. Please help me where I am wrong.

My article as- The FloralMart is a Indian florist and gift destinations, they offer home delivery of fresh flowers bouquets, cakes and personalized gift items with same-day delivery, next-day delivery. It is a venture of Sankhs Groups India and founded by Aditya Nath Mishra in 03 June 2019. It is a registered brand at the Office of Intellectual Property India.

History

The company was registered in Kanpur City of Uttar Pradesh state on 03 June 2019, by its parent company Sankhs Groups. In June 5 2019, the company was registered on Amazon India. In August 2019, the company was registered on Paytm India.

Retail categories

Though originally a flowers and gift retailer, the company has also expended into the E-commerce sector. . It has expended their business into the cakes and other gift items >.

Products and services

Fresh Flowers Bouquet, Cakes, Greeting Cards, and other gift items.

References     Brand in India- The FloralMart®. "THE FLORALMART - IP India Trademark Details". trademarks.iphawk.com. Retrieved 2021-07-03. Amazon.in Seller History - The FloralMart®. "The FloralMart". Amazon.in. Retrieved 2021-07-03. "Valentine's Day Week List 2021: Gifts for every day of the week - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2021-07-04. "Amazon sale offers: Celebrate Valentine's Day with Amazon's One-Stop Valentine's Shop for bouquets, greeting cards & more - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2021-07-04.

Category:E-commerce

Sudjack8 (talk) 03:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:The FloralMart
Amazon.in is worthless as a source (online storefront), trademark details are worthless (too sparse/connexion to subject) and the two Times of India pages appear to be non-sequiturs. None of your sources are acceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 04:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:42:42, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Ramil Salihar

[edit]


Ramil Salihar (talk) 04:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC) Can you please check for verification of this article. I have developed sources and changed some of them. Will be glad to receive a feedback.[reply]

05:55:20, 5 July 2021 review of submission by OliverForest

[edit]


I feel like the article I wrote that got denied for Erik Brandt and the Urban Hillbilly Quartet fulfills the noteriety criteria.

It has multiple articles from multiple regional print sources: The Kalamazoo Gazette (ref 1), The Ripsaw in Duluth (ref 8, 33), The Twin Cities Daily Planet (ref 13), The Isthmus in Madison (ref 14), The Pulse in the Twin Cities (ref 20), Seven Days in Vermont (ref 50), Onions AV Club in Madison (ref 70), and Skope in Boston (ref 73)

It also has an article in national music magazine Paste (ref 21).

I feel like this covers the "has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" criteria.

If it doesn't, why?

Thanks!

OliverForest (talk) 05:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OliverForest: Not about notability, I am just curious: In Draft:Erik Brandt and the Urban Hillbilly Quartet you use a bunch of sources that read like "Stonehocker 1999", something my head can't convert to the data needed to identify (and possibly access) the souce in question. Could you please elaborate what this refers to? Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:20:45, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Menu maharaj

[edit]
why reviewer rejected the article? There are more than ten sources talking about the topic. I can't able to understand how the topic is not notable. PLZZ review again don't support the deletion of article.

Menu maharaj (talk) 06:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Menu maharaj The reason for the rejection is given at the top of the draft; please review the comments left by reviewers. It would be preferred if you had fewer high quality source rather than a large number of poor quality sources. A large number of poor quality sources is usually a strong indication that the person does not meet notability guidelines. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:31:28, 5 July 2021 review of submission by 2001:D08:D8:7204:116B:E867:55D7:E74A

[edit]

Would like to learn how to publish genuinely without being recognized as intended to promote something.

2001:D08:D8:7204:116B:E867:55D7:E74A (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something or someone. Wikipedia is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. I would suggest that before attempting to create a new article(the hardest task to perform on Wikipedia) that you first spend much time editing existing articles in areas that interest you, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. Please also read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:50:24, 5 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by M K Mandawar

[edit]


Hello dear I have created an article for a person but it has been declined. I have paid for this and the person is notable in public it is also show on first search in Google. The name of person Poonam Ankur Chha. Also you can try to search. I have added all of the related references including their links. May I know the exact reason for declined. I'll be thankful to you.

M K Mandawar (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@M K Mandawar: There are two things that need to be cleared up. First of all: you say I have paid for this – what does that refer to? Where (or to whom) did you pay? Secondly, you used to have a declaration on your user page (here) that you are being paid for your contributions concerning Poonam Ankur Chhabra, but you removed it half an hour ago, just before you removed the conflict of interest tag from the draft. Why did you remove the disclosure from your user page, and why did you remove the tag from the draft? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I just realised that I have paid for this might have been a typo. Perhaps you meant to say "I have been paid for this"? --bonadea contributions talk 12:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah sorry it's a typo. M K Mandawar (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:17, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Ramil Salihar

[edit]


Ramil Salihar (talk) 14:15, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there In my article I received a feedback of reliable sources. However, I have tried many times and failed and I got a stop sign, so I cant resubmit it. I have improved references so how can I resubmit again? Or there are limited number of tries?


Ramil Salihar (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ramil Salihar The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further at this time. Please review the comments left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 14:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:52:21, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Shekhar Aman

[edit]


Hi, as suggested in the morning, I've removed all the amazon and facebook links. Also, I've added 4 reliable sources as a media coverage. I cross checked the wiki page of "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divya_Prakash_Dubey". In this wiki page also, reliable sources is of media. If its still wrong, then please help me proceed further. Shekhar Aman (talk) 14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See the section below. Curbon7 (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:55:12, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Gardenkur

[edit]


Gardenkur (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gardenkur, the subject of the draft seems to be a non-ntoable government official, and the draft fails both our notability criteria for politicians and our general notability criteria. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:47:56, 5 July 2021 review of submission by 2600:1700:D4B0:301F:4C65:266F:AE29:8D42

[edit]


I keep making adjustments - you will see this actor on Getty images, and many tv shows/shows for young people/children Do not understand why keeps getting rejected

2600:1700:D4B0:301F:4C65:266F:AE29:8D42 (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon, Getty Images, Applemusic, IMDb, TVguide, blogs and interviews are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sources on the draft were discussed and dismissed above, with Getty being the only new source and still useless (we can't use it - too sparse). You're clearly not listening to the criticism. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:13:19, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Shekhar Aman

[edit]


Shekhar Aman (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shekhar Aman, the draft was seen as too much of an advertisement due to the use of inline external links and a lack of reliable sources. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:58:05, 5 July 2021 review of submission by RedX8

[edit]


RedX8 (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RedX8, You didn't ask a question, but the reviewers determined that this draft seemed more like a resume than an encyclopedic entry. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:18:00, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Mohamedhussein001

[edit]


Mohamedhussein001 (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been deleted as it meets the speedy deletion criterion for advertising. The tone of the draft is wholly inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. --Kinu t/c 19:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:30:14, 5 July 2021 review of submission by Benkershman

[edit]

I'm wondering what other information I need to provide in order for the submission to be noteworthy enough. Would it help if I was able to include a birth date, legal name and more info on their family background? Benkershman (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benkershman You must demonstrate with independent reliable sources with significant coverage that this person meets at least one aspect of the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. The other stuff can wait. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_July_5&oldid=1033029024"