Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 1 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 3 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 2[edit]

05:41:56, 2 January 2022 review of submission by IPN23[edit]

Hi, When I checked Category:Indian news websites there are many small websites with less rankings not at all notable like B4blaze is there. So I tried creating article for B4blaze which have very good Indian ranking and as I'm a software engineer I know, For that ranking they need minimum 1 million page views per day. And I researched about B4blaze they have news in 3 different languages also they have a Over-the-top media service too and got many awards etc. Also they have many news and notable achievements published in many national medias. If we check social media accounts there also we can see the badge for public figure.eg: https://www.facebook.com/B4Blaze/ , https://www.facebook.com/B4blazeMalayalam/ If the notability is not getting in article maybe because, Im not a very active Wiki user who know all the technicality of placing the notability facts on top. Actually I create articles from my local area only, so I will never ever contribute without researching on topic. If anything is missing please help me to complete my article.

IPN23 (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:00:58, 2 January 2022 review of submission by Softidia[edit]


Softidia (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Softidia, you're probably asking about User:Softidia/sandbox/Softidia, which is about a company named Softidia (though it says almost nothing about this). You've been told: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Do you need an explanation of any part of this? (Note that a number of the terms are linked to explanatory web pages.) -- Hoary (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:36:00, 2 January 2022 review of draft by ThinkerCastillo[edit]


ThinkerCastillo (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ThinkerCastillo You don't ask a question. You have resubmitted your draft and it is pending. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:44:09, 2 January 2022 review of submission by Bertverse[edit]

I edited an article entitled "Pixelfed" to be posted but it was rejected just now. I was curious with the mistakes that occur in the article. thank you.

Bertverse (talk) 11:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bertverse, Draft:Pixelfed has not been rejected. It has been declined. This means that you're free to improve it. You've been asked for significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Please, here, specify three of these. -- Hoary (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bertverse I found a German news site (of a major national newspaper) that mentions "Pixelverse" several times.
Welchering, Peter. "Alternativen zu Youtube & Co.: Die unendlichen Weiten des Fediversums". FAZ.NET (in German).
Unfortunately I cannot read German so I have no idea if it is a usable source or not. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it is Pixelfed not Pixelverse. 😁😁😁 Someone in Mastodon also posted news about Pixelfed in German. But since it is in German and I am not fluently speaking German, I haven't taken it as reference. But thank you for the news, I really appreciate your effort. Maybe I should use the article with the help of Deepl Translator (?)

Bertverse (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:11:58, 2 January 2022 review of submission by Nushat786[edit]


Nushat786 (talk) 13:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:51:50, 2 January 2022 review of draft by Singodwalagroup[edit]


I published a encyclopedia entry on Apna Godam, which is a leading agritech company in India. But the submission is declined 2 times. Please help. Singodwalagroup (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Singodwalagroup The sources you have offered do not establish that this company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Basic profiles, interviews, the company website, and annoucements of routine business activities like the raising of capital or commencement of operations are all unacceptable for establishing notability. "Startups" rarely merit articles; companies must already be established and have a reputation sufficient for independent reliable sources to take note of them on their own, not based on any materials put out by the company.
If you are associated with this company, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_January_2&oldid=1064377916"