Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 26 << May | June | Jul >> June 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 27[edit]

02:02:13, 27 June 2022 review of draft by Judgehistorian[edit]


The title of my draft was changed by a reviewer shortly after its submission. The title as submitted was of a notable event and it was changed to the name of the person in the event. This person is significant only for their role in the single event. The name of the person in the event obviously has to be mentioned but was not the original title. I feel that the revised title caused the article to be reviewed for submission as an article about a notable person. I believe it was denied for submission because I do not have references for the person as would be found in a biography of a notable person. However, I do have significant coverage, from reliable sources of the event. What can I change so this will be reviewed as a notable event and not about the person in the event? Judgehistorian (talk) 02:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgehistorian: Since the event is him being named a judge at age 17 (and the related legal wrangling) it's impossible to have an article on just the event itself without it simultaneously being an article on him as that is his claim to notability. You don't help your case by having your lede be about the person and not the related event, and by the article as writ being about him as much as it's about the legal wrangling. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:17:07, 27 June 2022 review of draft by OMGSiddharth[edit]


I just want to make sure all the required details are given or have to add any more details. As it is gonna take months i would like to utilize the waiting time to fulfill the needs to publish the draft.

OMGSiddharth (talk) 08:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Gowtham G.A is presumably what you mean? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • OMGSiddharth Please do not copy your draft here, we have a link to it, if Gowtham G.A is the right one. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:41:06, 27 June 2022 review of submission by Avrviktors[edit]


Avrviktors (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avrviktors You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely document the existence of a company, please see Your First Article. If this is your company, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on formal disclosures you must make. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:56:45, 27 June 2022 review of draft by Krkkc[edit]


Krkkc (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm new here and I'm 13 so please help me with my first draw please I did what I could and now I need help to make it OKKrkkc (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Krkkc: to "make it OK", you need to address the reasons why this draft was declined, namely referencing. One primary source, cited only once, is not enough to establish the notability of this person, or to support the article contents. You need to show multiple secondary sources, which are independent and reliable, and which provide significant coverage of the subject. And then you need to support each material statement made by citing one of these sources, so that the reader knows where the information is coming from. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK,thx I'll do my best to correct it Krkkc (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Krkkc Also, that image is probably copyrighted by his agency. I know you are just learning, but for future reference, you can't release that image under a Creative Commons license (and if it is copyrighted, it won't stay at Wikimedia Commons). I tried to open the page it was copied from, to look for a copyright statement, but the page never opened. Hope this helps, and if you keep learning, you'll make a good Wikipedia editor! 71.228.112.175 (talk) 06:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
image is taken from here https://zaagencja.com/people/aktorzy/178/piotr-witkowski so how I can do it correctly?
Thx for your time Krkkc (talk) 06:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Krkkc: you can't do it correctly, unless you own the copyright in that image (very unlikely), or the copyright owner has expressly released it under terms which allow anyone to use it (possible, but still unlikely, and some evidence of this is needed). In other words, the image needs to be removed from the draft and from the upload repository. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I removed image from the draft ,not sure where I find upload repository Krkkc (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Krkkc Upliad repository=Wikimedia Commons, where you (I think it was you) uploaded the picture from its original place at the agency's website. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 04:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK,I did it, hope it will be enough good, thx Krkkc (talk) 08:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:12:32, 27 June 2022 review of draft by Ramprasad1975[edit]


My Draf is rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krishnamruta_Maharnava&action=edit&redlink=1


There is no online reference for Krishnamruta maharnava so I can not provide references

This is present in a hard copy of a book

https://madhwakart.com/product/sankeerna-granthagalu-2/

Is someone can give an english translation of this book online , that will be the reference

How does someone provide reference on something fully offline ?


Ramprasad1975 (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramprasad1975: sources don't need to be online, and they don't need to be in English. However, we do need to see multiple reliable and independent sources in order to establish notability, and therefore this book you refer to isn't alone enough.
Offline sources also need to be cited clearly and with sufficient detail to enable others to locate the relevant content and verify that it supports the information in the article. The way you have cited the book is incorrect in every respect. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:36:57, 27 June 2022 review of submission by Maddie.exton[edit]


Maddie.exton (talk) 12:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:36:57, 27 June 2022 review of submission by Maddie.exton



Hi! I first attempted writing an article about OUTPOST gallery on 22/June and it was declined due to copyright (I understand this now). I didn't delete the post as I thought this was done by editors. I have been working on a new article on the same subject and being very careful about referencing and copyright. I wrote everything in this article myself and published via sandbox for review but it has been declined due to copyright. Is there somewhere I can take this for feedback rather than it being declined?

You can check the copyright violations here [1]. Theroadislong (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:22:49, 27 June 2022 review of draft by Katiedvonch[edit]


Katiedvonch (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was notified that this is a duplicate submission. How do I see the duplicate submission? I have been in contact with the subject of this biography and he does not believe there is another article about him awaiting review.

Hi Katiedvonch, the submission is a duplicate of Draft:Dave Liu, which you blanked a few minutes before posting this message. Please also go through WP:COI, you may have a conflict of interest that needs to be disclosed due to our policies. Justiyaya 13:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do I delete that draft? That is not the submission that I want reviewed. Katiedvonch (talk) 13:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Katiedvonch, I think you've figured it out or someone else deleted the article for you, good luck and feel free to post additional questions here. Justiyaya 18:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've left you a message on your talk page explaining the guidelines relating to conflicts of interests. Justiyaya 18:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:37:01, 27 June 2022 review of submission by TovarishLukas[edit]


I'm having trouble with writing this wikipedia page as the information I am getting about the person is from speaking to said person right next to me. How can I cite a one-on-one interview?

TovarishLukas (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can't ALL content requires a reliable published source. Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And it sounds like you probably have a conflict of interest. I've posted a message on your talk page; please respond to it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:53:41, 27 June 2022 review of submission by HelloEstefania[edit]


Hi, following your input I'd like to know what's the criteria for "No relevant improvement since previous deletion. She is not a notable actress or business person." Thank you.

HelloEstefania (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HelloEstefania The reviewer believes that the subject has not progressed in terms of notability following the 2021 AFD, resulting in your submission being rejected. Justiyaya 18:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for your prompt reply. The draft submitted in 2022 was dramatically improved in comparison to the one some other user submitted in 2021. Is there anything you recommend for requesting a second review of the latest article? 2604:B000:A230:1057:6997:DF1F:7DA9:22E2 (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
here the new draft Draft:Estefanía Soto - Wikipedia HelloEstefania (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:58:32, 27 June 2022 review of submission by HelloEstefania[edit]


I would like to know what's the criteria for the rejection reason left on the draft: "No relevant improvement since previous deletion. She is not a notable actress or business person." There are other figures related to Estefanía's sector with less references and their articles were approved. Thanks!

HelloEstefania (talk) 16:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See other stuff exists for that argument. Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
HelloEstefania That an article exists does not mean that it was "approved" by anyone. There are numerous reasons inappropriate content could be on Wikipedia. As this is a volunteer project with people doing what they can when they can, inappropriate things can get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you would like to help out, you can identify these other inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:52:54, 27 June 2022 review of submission by Eafykk[edit]

Can someone please delete this article Eafykk (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Eafykk just place {{Db-u1}} at the top of page and an admin will delete it. S0091 (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_June_27&oldid=1096204318"