Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 6 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 7[edit]

05:26:57, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Engjaipur[edit]


Engjaipur (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:41:52, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Llouest[edit]


Hi,

I received this morning the following message, allegedly from a Wikipedia address.

Is this message legitimate, or is it a fraud?

If it is legitimate, what does it mean?

Thanks,

Best regards,

Llouest

________________________________________________________________________________ De : ويكيبيديا <wiki@wikimedia.org> Envoyé : lundi 7 mars 2022 02:03 À : Llouest <ljlouest@msn.com> Objet : بعث ‪HitomiAkane‬ لك رسالة في ويكيبيديا 


	 	بعث ‪HitomiAkane‬ رسالةً إليك في صفحة نقاشك.

اعرض الرسالة ‪HitomiAkane‬ اعرض التعديلات



للتحكم في ما هي رسائل البريد الإلكتروني التي نرسلها إليك، تحقق من تفضيلاتك. Wikimedia Foundation, 1 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA

_________________________________________________________________________________


Llouest (talk) 08:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Llouest: I translated the message, and it seems like someone left you a message on your talk page on the Arabic Wikipedia (so nothing to worry about). In the future, please ask questions like this at the Teahouse. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:40:21, 7 March 2022 review of submission by EdwinKibs[edit]


EdwinKibs (talk) 10:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:49:37, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Dravis williams[edit]


my draft Draft:PERICENT has been decline due to promotional , may i know in which section it look like promotional Dravis williams (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dravis williams The entire thing. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company and what it does. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company- and not based on any materials put out by the company like press releases or the mere reporting of its activities- showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Please read Your First Article.
If you are associated with this company, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:58:16, 7 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Dravis williams[edit]



Dravis williams (talk) 11:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Hello I have trying to publish my page on Wikipedia from last 1 month but every time I got deny. All my references is from independent media . Can you please help me to publish my page forward.[reply]

It will be really helpful for me and my organization.

@Dravis williams: if you are writing for your company, you must disclose that you are a paid editor per WP:PAID. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:03:26, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Linusfrom[edit]


Linusfrom (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to check again. Becouse The person Im Writeing about is a professional at Fortnite. I kindly ask you to let me publish this.

@Linusfrom: I highly doubt that they meet out notability guidelines, given that the only channel that comes up when I search that on Youtube has 6 subscribers. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:44:29, 7 March 2022 review of draft by George.kvakovszky[edit]


From content creator George.kvakovszky Monday March 7, 2022

As content creator, I object to the decision to delete the wikipedia entry ‘Bernard Parham’. I am afraid Crisco 1492, et al. have missed the point regarding Bernard Parham’s notability. Nobody claimed that the sequence of moves 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 had never been played before. Given enough time, a monkey typing at a keyboard, would reproduce the complete works of Shakespeare. The point is that Bernard Parham took an obscure, discredited opening and played it during his entire chess career against Master level opposition, with success.

Parham’s maximum USCF rating was over 2300, which is International Master level, and he did this by playing the Parham Attack exclusively as White. Parham was also awarded the National Master title in 2002 by USCF. By the way, nobody in the world calls this opening the Danvers Opening. It is referred to, in over two hundred counties, as the Parham Attack. Deleting the entry ‘Bernard Parham’ would be a travesty, sham and a mockery. As content creator, it is my considered judgment that this entry is well referenced, and marking it as draft is also a mistake. This article should be restored as a wikipedia entry in its original format. Moreover, the Wikipedia entry ‘Danvers Opening’ should be renamed/redirected to the new entry ‘Parham Attack’.


George.kvakovszky (talk) 12:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@George.kvakovszky: the page that you created has not been deleted, it has just been moved to a draft. The editor who moved it expressed concerns that you are an undisclosed paid editor and/or have a conflict of interest. The draft will have to go through the AfC process before it is accepted. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an undisclosed paid editor and I do not have a conflict of interest. I am a volunteer contributor and I am retired. I am not related to Bernard parham (who is Black), while I am very much Caucasian, in fact my father was born in the Caucasus mountains of the Ukraine. I am an FIDE rated chess player andd found it curious, bizarre and quirky that wikipedia refers to the 'Parham Attack' as the 'Danvers Opening'
. This obscure opening was popularized by Bernard parham of Indianapolis. its i9s known as the parham Attack in at least two hundred countries in the World. Infinity years of competitive chess I have never hear anyone refer to this opening as the Danvers Opening. NationalChessMaster Bernard parham is one of very few living players who has a chess opening named after him. The majority are Russian. I am not aware of any other living US chess player who has this distinction George.kvakovszky March 7, 2022 George.kvakovszky (talk) 00:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:00:45, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Obyno2020[edit]


The editor claims that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notablity standard, this is not true as the subject is widely known in Nigeria as has been verified by Facebook and Instagram.

Obyno2020 (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Obyno2020: "Widely known in a region" - i.e. fame/infamy - does not equal notability as Wikipedia defines it. Especially so on social media, which is very much gameable. Refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
None of your sources are any good; the reject looks perfectly justifiable to me. Since it's been brought up in the reviewer notes, what is your connexion to her? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback. I have no connexions to her. I am interested in documenting notable figures from South East Nigeria. I will look for more independent sources and revert. Obyno2020 (talk) 21:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:29:03, 7 March 2022 review of submission by EdwinKibs[edit]


The editor claims that the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notablity standard, and it does not need to be reviewed again. i am kindly requesting for a review of my submission.

EdwinKibs (talk) 20:29:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EdwinKibs: Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
In sum, none of your sources are any good, and none of your edits have added any sort of source we can use. The rejection seems perfectly fine to me. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


22:33:56, 7 March 2022 review of submission by Sungwoo-Yang[edit]


I'm trying to create a Wiki page for Chattanooga Solar Decathlon team, but it was declined. There is a wiki page for Illinois Solar Decathlon team, and I'm not sure what are key differences from theirs and our team. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Draft:Chattanooga Solar Decathlon

Illinois Solar Decathlon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungwoo-Yang (talk • contribs) 22:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sungwoo-Yang I have fixed your links to proper internal links, the whole URL is unnecessary. Wikipedia does not have "wiki pages", it has articles. Beware in using other articles as a model unless they are classified as good articles. It could be that the other articles are also inappropriate- as I think is the case here. The article you cite has similar problems to your draft. An article about your organization must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 22:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_March_7&oldid=1076996203"