Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 16 << May | June | Jul >> June 18 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 17

[edit]

01:02, 17 June 2023 review of submission by 27.32.118.9

[edit]

The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. This bieng his art being in major blockbuster films. Studios zealously guard the length of the tail credits of a film and for this he was not credited in most of them as an artist. Most artist arnt credited but none the less he made unique contributions to critical acclamied movies.

The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. This being his screen play awards. He has won siginificatn awards in writing screrenplays that being the reviewsrs choice award.

Multiple independent sources are used may be combined to demonstarte notability. Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event. His audio intervew regarding his work in blockbuster films should be enough for that. Howver there are other sources cited for aditional proof.

Creative professional. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work. Agian look at the movies hes helped create and his interveiws regarding them. 

27.32.118.9 (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interviews are not independent sources. He is free to make whatever claims he wishes on his own website or social media, but here we need a reliable source. If he is not in the credits of films for his work, we need something else. The awards you mention are not significant awards and you have no independent sources that discuss them. 331dot (talk) 01:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not a single one of your references is to a reliable, independent source that devotes significant coverage to Land. Vast swathes of your draft are unreferenced and therefore fail the core content policy of Verifiability. Cullen328 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06:29, 17 June 2023 review of submission by 117.233.249.24

[edit]

The art form (Sattriya) performed by Dr.Kandali is a form of Indian classical dance. Therefore there are mostly video recordings available for the art form and the news reports related to the performance are not available online too. So, kindly advise what kind of further source can be added to the article? 117.233.249.24 (talk) 06:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

offline sources are completely fine for wikipedia. lettherebedarklight晚安 12:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12:04, 17 June 2023 review of submission by VenkataN1977

[edit]

Hi, I have provided all available citations, as this person is an reputed journalist in Telugu states, all his work is in youtube. you may not get more content on independent pages. please review and approve VenkataN1977 (talk) 12:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is hard to write about journalists here, as reliable sources don't often write about journalists. Their work on YouTube would not be an acceptable source. If there are no other sources, this person would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:48, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Blackmamba07

[edit]

Hi,

I am looking to write this publication on this British artist that is on the rise in the united kingdom - but received somme feedback that that person is not notable. I am not sure is there specific metrics for notability?

It would be great to get someones opinion on this,

Best

Kudi Blackmamba07 (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blackmamba07 Describing someone as "on the rise" is a strong indicator that they do not meet our definition of notability- such as a notable artist. Someone must already be of note to be included in Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:03, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Arti Llanaj

[edit]

I tried to add an article about this widely known person in Albania, Kosovo and Macedonia. Now that I understand why they canceled it the first time, I have now repaid it again for reconsideration! Arti Llanaj (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted the draft and it is pending. It's likely to be declined, especially with language like "Passionate about technology since adolescence" and very few independent reliable sources. Facebook rarely if ever should be used as a source. His own description of himself is useless for establishing notability. Please read Your First Article. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about someone and their accomplishments; it's for telling what others say is the person's accomplishments and what is significant/important/influential about them. We call this notability(please read) 331dot (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:25, 17 June 2023 review of submission by ByeBlocks4224

[edit]

I put the Num-stub template ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ByeBlocks4224: please do not resubmit drafts that have been rejected already. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
but why Ranveersp (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NUMBER ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Indeffed for socking) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:56, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Ranveersp22

[edit]

how to improve and publis my article Ranveersp (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 15:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:09, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Amigocyber

[edit]

hie how to solve the issue. Amigocyber (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Amigocyber: there is no issue to resolve, as this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. And please don't move it (especially to an incorrect title), which is pointless and only creates confusion at this stage. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thank you @DoubleGrazing Amigocyber (talk) 10:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19:55, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Noufal Essack

[edit]

Jinan CD is an Indian motocross Legend. i humbly request you to approve the page. he is a Motocross hero in India. You can check it in google. If you need any docs , will send it you. Thanks. Noufal Essack (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noufal Essack The draft has been deleted as blatant promotion. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to attempt on Wikipedia, and it is good to first gain experience and knowledge by first edtiing exiting articles, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. I also recommend that you use the new user tutorial to learn more about what we are looking for in terms of article content. 331dot (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:15, 17 June 2023 review of submission by Duplicity5510

[edit]

Since this article was rejected, I've added two high quality secondary sources directly mentioning the subject. Can the article be reviewed again? 

Duplicity5510 (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One isn't a secondary source (.gov), and the other is still connected to the one event. You should look at WP:BLP1E, which explains notability for people who are notable mainly for one event. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 22:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_June_17&oldid=1161490130"