Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 February 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 17 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 18[edit]

08:20, 18 February 2024 review of submission by Etienneadaher[edit]

Why is my page rejected? I, Etienne Daher, am the CTO and founder of Ete-services

What do i need to do to have my page published? If more date is required, I will fill them, just kindly give me clear guidelines on what's requested. Etienneadaher (talk) 08:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your obvious conflict-of-interest, I highly advise you NOT to make that article again and instead focus your contributions elsewhere. Wikipedia is not a place for promoting or publicizing. If your company is notable enough to warrant its own article, then please go to Wikipedia's requested article page. ''Flux55'' (talk) 08:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing your previous activity in the help desk, this is a guideline for notability. ''Flux55'' (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Etienneadaher: this is not social media, where you can write up your 'profile' or tell the world about yourself and your business. This is an encyclopaedia, and we publish articles on subjects which are considered notable and encyclopaedically worthy. You should probably look into the likes of LinkedIn, etc. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:12, 18 February 2024 review of submission by 116.90.110.117[edit]

business purpose 116.90.110.117 (talk) 09:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quit spamming! Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:11, 18 February 2024 review of submission by Masudrana10[edit]

nothing Masudrana10 (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Masudrana10: you don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected and is awaiting deletion. Please read and understand WP:AUTOBIO and WP:PROMO. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:58, 18 February 2024 review of submission by Nicky Falcon[edit]

Hello, can you give me an advice where I should add the sources to? As was noticed UNIT EL is a wrong place, so what is the necessary place. Also I think new links meet the requirements of wikipedia Nicky Falcon (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nicky Falcon. Please read WP:EXTERNAL. There should be no external links in the body of the text, and only one or two in the External Links section at the end. Qcne (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, I did what you said, could you please check my work and if possible give me some advice on how to improve it. And do you think it can be sent for reviewing? Nicky Falcon (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Nicky Falcon, that is a lot better now. I would submit for review. Qcne (talk) 13:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:40, 18 February 2024 review of submission by JerseyCurator23[edit]

Seeking volunteers for assistance with this draft. I am unable to convince the powers that be that the Mandela Effect is a topic worthy of its own page. There is a difference between singular false memory and shared/collective false memory, and I find the need to shove the two together to be a disservice to readers. Nevertheless, I'd like to request that someone either incorporate this draft into the existing subsection or continue work on it independently so that someone up above might finally find it worthy. My work on this page is over, so its future is in your hands. JerseyCurator23 (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This forum is not for soliciting replacement editors. If you want to offer this as a proposed addition to the existing article you mention, you should use its article talk page. 331dot (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:41, 18 February 2024 review of submission by JuniperChill[edit]

With regards to 'WP:TOO SOON', does it mean articles should not be created before release, hence I cannot really find any reviews from Solarpunk? Or the fact the game is not notable, at least for now. Plus, I did cite sources so that it is real.

Also, are images not allowed for draftS since it won't let me upload a cover for this

Additionally,, does decline(d), deny/ied and reject(ed) mean the same in the sense of AFC since thats normally the case. Since I moved this to draft (accidentally made this an article at 1st), why did the Solarpunk (video game) need to be removed since redirects need be kept after moves/renames. JuniperChill (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JuniperChill. Your sources do not show notability yet, because they are all WP:PRIMARY. Once the game has been released, and some mainstream websites review it or it appears in magazines, then you will likely have enough secondary sources for the game to become notable. So it is too soon in the sense that there are not yet enough secondary sources to prove notability.
The article was moved to draftspace- if it is accepted then it will go back to mainspace. The redirect was deleted under WP:CNR.
Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I will take a stop from working on Solarpunk (and Draft:Sun Haven, both articles I made) for now, at least for 60 days since Solarpunk is due to release in the summer. Plus, how did it get reviewd within 30 minutes when others take a week? You also forgot to answer questions about images on drafts and the meaning of declined/rejected drafts. JuniperChill (talk) 12:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JuniperChill: non-free content (which I presume the images you refer to are) can only be used in the main article space. In any case, images are not needed before publication, as they do not contribute to notability or otherwise affect the draft's acceptability in any way.
Some reviewers patrol the newly submitted end of the draft pool, and therefore many drafts are reviewed in a matter of minutes. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]