Wikipedia talk:Our social policies are not a suicide pact

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Good essay[edit]

Short but well written and with enough context for a newbie to comprehend. (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. Does it mean we can kick obvious trolls butts? Or that we should quit rather than commit suicide? Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 13:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another useless essay that derails productive dialogues[edit]

Of course they are not a suicide pact (which should be "are not suicide pacts"). They are also not battleships, kung-fu lessons or black and white movies. If this is an analogy, it is not explained at all.

Also people who display evidence of bad faith have been known to link to this essay when reminded of wikipedia policy, treating it as some kind of get out of jail free card. Without more context and explanation this essay doesn't stand up. MaxBrowne (talk) 06:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe this actually gets linked to by editors and admins to justify actions[edit]

I mean, they clearly haven't read it. Or, if they have, they should get a WP:CIR block. Primergrey (talk) 02:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]