See old discussions regarding this page (from around 2005):
- Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive C#privacy_policy
- No, we don't. It's been suggested in the past (by, for example, user:BigFatBuddha), but nobody managed to get round to it. Martin 09:56 17 Jul 2003 (UTC)
the whole point of wikis is that there is no privacy. You are accountable for your edits. -- Tarquin 17:16 17 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Wikipedia holds no personal information beyond what people choose to put on their user pages. You don't need to give your email address, and I'm sure Jimbo can say words to the effect that he won't sell them. As for Black Panthers... well, everyone can read the site. And everyone can see your IP (if you edited anonymously) or your username (if you have one). You currently need dev access to get the IP from the username edit, so your privacy is pretty secure I would say. -- Tarquin 19:58 17 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I also agree with the original poster. I am new to Wikipedia and I am very excited about it. I want to create a username and furnish my email so I can be contacted by other site users (securely), get my password emailed to me if I forget it, etc. However, I have a blanket policy that I do not give out my email address to anyone who is not willing to make me a promise up front that they will not sell it. Why, when I get a lot of spam anyway? Because I don't want to encourage or enable the spam "machine". I am disappointed that Wikipedia does not make a promise of this kind.
It does seem ironic to me that the best way to ensure privacy is to post anonymously... -Sean Curtin 21:21, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This came up on Wikipedia: Village pump (policy):
- How long are access logs retained?
- If a user is logged in (personal ID stored in a cookie), is that cookie included in the access logs, so the logs show what articles the person has been reading?
- Who has access to the logs?
- Can Wikipedia's maintainers state that they've never gotten any PATRIOT Act orders to reveal anyone's browsing history? (If they /have/ gotten such orders, they may not be allowed to say so, but if they haven't gotten such orders, they can say they haven't). So an answer like "no comment" can be interpreted as "yes, Wikipedia has turned stuff over to Homeland security."
This page says it's supposed to be linked from the footer of all pages on the site; I don't see that link anywhere. -- Beland 13:12, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
Community consultation: Remit of the Ombudsman Commission
The Ombudsman Commission would like to consult the community on their opinions about the remit of the Commission. Please see this notice. Feel free to cross-post this notice to any appropriate noticeboard. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 15:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
RFC regarding the scope of the Ombudsman Commission
For more information please visit the RFC, which can be found at m:Requests for comment/Scope of Ombudsman Commission. Please direct all questions and comments there.
For the Ombudsman Commission,