Jump to content

Zinovy Rozhestvensky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Waacstats (talk | contribs) at 21:46, 20 May 2013 (→References: add persondata short description using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Zinovy Petrovich Rozhestvensky
Nickname(s)Mad Dog (never to his face)[1]
BornNovember 11, 1848
DiedJanuary 14, 1909(1909-01-14) (aged 60)
Saint Petersburg
AllegianceRussian Empire
Service / branch Russian Navy
Years of service1868 - 1906
RankVice Admiral
CommandsBaltic Fleet
Battles / warsRusso-Turkish War (1877–1878)
Russo-Japanese War
AwardsOrder of St. George
Order of St. Vladimir

Zinovy Petrovich Rozhestvensky[2] (Template:Lang-ru) (November 11 [O.S. October 30] 1848 – January 14, 1909) was an admiral of the Imperial Russian Navy. He was in command of the Second Pacific Squadron in the Battle of Tsushima, during the Russo-Japanese War.

Admiral Rozhesvensky selected the Knyaz Suvorov, one of four brand new battleships of the French-designed Borodino class, as his flagship for the voyage to the Pacific. Under Admiral Rozhestvensky's command, the Russian navy holds the record of sailing an all-steel, coal-powered battleship fleet over 18,000 miles (29,000 km) one way, to engage an enemy in decisive battle.

Early Naval Career

Rozhestvensky graduated from the Sea Cadet Corps in 1868 and the Mikhailovsky Artillery Academy in 1873. he initially served with the Baltic Fleet as a gunnery officer. In 1876 he transferred to the Black Sea Fleet. During the Russo Turkish War he served on board the gunboat Vesta. On June 10, 1877 six torpedo boats, five of which were armed with spar torpedoes, attempted to attack four ironclads of the Turkish Navy. The then Lieutenant Rozhestvensky volunteered to lead the first attack against the Turkish warships, but his torpedo boat became caught up in the rope boom defenses that protected the enemy ships. The attack was beaten back by Turkish gunfire which destroyed one torpedo boat and the remaining boats withdrew, leaving the enemy ironclads intact.[3] In July 1877 while still assigned to the Vesta, he engaged and damaged a Turkish warship, the Fethi-Bulend, and Rozhestvensky was awarded the Order of Saint Vladimir and Order of St George for this action.

In 1883 to 1885 Rozhestensky was seconded to the newly formed Bulgarian Navy. He returned to Russian service and was senior officer on the battery ship Kreml and the cruiser Gerzog Edinburgski. He then commanded the clipper Naezdnik and gunboat Grozyachiy. In 1891-93 he was naval attache in London. In 1894 he commanded the Vladimir Monomakh which was part of the Russian Meditarranean squadron under the command of Admiral Stepan Makarov. In 1896-98 he commanded the coast defence ship Pervenets. In 1898 he became commander of the gunnery school of the Baltic Fleet. In 1900 he commanded the salvage operation for the Admiral Graf Apraksin. In 1902 he was appointed Chief of the Naval Staff and proposed a plan for strengthening the Russian Navy in the Far East.

Russo-Japanese War

Route of Baltic Fleet to the Battle of Tsushima.

Prior to the war against Japan, Rozhestvensky was commander of the Baltic Fleet. Tsar Nicholas II ordered Rozhestvensky to take the Baltic Fleet to East Asia to protect the Russian naval base of Port Arthur. The Tsar had selected the right man for the job, for it would take an iron-fisted commander[4] to sail an untested fleet of brand new battleships (for some of the new Borodinos, this voyage was their shakedown cruise) and new untrained sailors on the longest coal-powered battleship fleet voyage in recorded history. Admiral Rozhestvensky, a veteran of the Turkish war,[5] had a fiery temper when dealing with a subordinate, and both officers and men knew to stand clear of "Mad Dog"[6] when a subordinate either disobeyed orders, was incompetent, or both.[7] Rozhestvensky was fully aware that he had a new untrained navy under his command and that re-coaling stations would not be available during the journey, due to Britain's alliance with Japan; and that both the shakedown testing of the new battleships and the gunnery practice/training would have to occur during the voyage. In addition, re-coaling would have to be done at sea, instead of in port as with most other navies. As a consequence of these circumstances, the mission-minded commander would sometimes fire service ammunition (live gunfire) across the bows of an errant warship, and in a fiery moment fling his binoculars from the bridge into the sea.[8] When his battleship fleet set sail in 1904, Rozhestvensky's staff ensured that his flagship, Knyaz Suvorov, had a good supply of binoculars on board.[9]

Nevertheless the inexperience of the Russian Baltic Fleet almost triggered a war between Russia and Great Britain as it sailed through the North Sea. After several Russian ships mistook British fishing trawlers at Dogger Bank for torpedo boats from the Imperial Japanese Navy, they opened fire on the unarmed civilian vessels.[10] The Dogger Bank incident on the night of the 21–22 October 1904 resulted in the deaths of three British fishermen and many wounded. One sailor and a priest aboard a Russian cruiser were also killed in the crossfire.[11] The Russian government agreed to investigate the incident following a great deal of international diplomatic pressure. Admiral Rozhestvenski was ordered to dock in Vigo, Spain while battleships of the Royal Navy from the British Home Fleet were prepared for war. Several British cruiser squadrons shadowed Rozhestvenski's fleet as it made its way through the Bay of Biscay. On arrival in Spain, Rozhestvenski left behind those officers he considered responsible for the incident (as well as at least one officer who had been critical of him).[12] On November 25, 1904, the British and the Russian governments signed a joint agreement in which they agreed to submit the issue to an International Commission of Inquiry at The Hague.[13] On February 26, 1905, the commission published its report. It criticized Rozhestvenski for allowing his ships to fire upon the British ships. But noted that "as each [British] vessel swept the horizon in every direction with her own searchlights to avoid being taken by surprise, it was difficult to prevent confusion". The report also concluded that once the mistake was known "Admiral Rozhestvenski personally did everything he could, from beginning to end of the incident, to prevent [the trawlers] from being fired upon by the squadron".[14] Russia eventually paid £66,000 (£5.8m today) in compensation.[15]

Almost as soon as the Baltic Fleet arrived in the Far East in May 1905, it was engaged by the Japanese Navy at the decisive Battle of Tsushima (27–28 May 1905).

Battle of Tsushima

Japanese Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō drew upon his experiences from the battles of Port Arthur and the Yellow Sea, and this time would not split his fires nor engage Rozhestvensky at excessive ranges, as he had done with Admiral Vitgeft at the Yellow Sea the year previously.[16] He would instead, with the proper use of reconnaissance vessels and wireless communications[17] position his battle fleet in such a way as to "preserve his interior lines of movement", which would allow him to have shorter distances to cover while causing Rozhestvensky to have longer distances to travel, regardless of battleship speeds.[18]

Naval intelligence had already informed Togo of Rozhestvensky's mission, that of reaching Vladivostok, and avoiding contact with the Japanese navy if at all possible, and fighting as little as possible, if forced into it. Rozhestvensky's objective was to reinforce the Vladivostok Squadron, and then, when the Russian navy felt sufficiently prepared, they would engage the Japanese navy in a decisive action.[19]

With this knowledge in possession, Togo planned on preempting the Russian plan, by positioning his battle fleet to "bring the Russian fleet to battle, regardless of the speed of either battlefleet." Admiral "Togo was able to appear directly across Rozhestvensky's line of advance; he was headed" (Rozhestvensky's T had been crossed).[17] With only most of his bow guns to use, Rozhestvensky's main batteries were "thrown successively out of bearing" as he continued to advance.[20] Other than surrender or retreat, Rozhestvensky had but two choices; fight a pitched battle or charge Togo's battleline. He chose the former, and by the evening of 27 May 1905, Rozhestvensky's flagship and the majority of his fleet were on the bottom of the Tsushima Straits.[20] The Russian had lost 5,000.[21]

During the battle, Admiral Rozhestvensky was wounded in the head by a shell fragment. The unconscious admiral was transferred to a destroyer. He was later taken prisoner when the ship was later captured by the Imperial Japanese Navy.

Aftermath

In 1906, Rozhestvensky faced court martial for the disaster, along with each of his surviving battleship commanders. Some faced prison and some the firing squad for either losing the battle or surrendering on the high seas. The Tsar's court was fully aware that Admiral Nikolai Nebogatov had surrendered the Russian fleet, as Rozhestvensky had been wounded and unconscious for most of the battle, and was very reluctant to accept his statements of responsibility. Nonetheless, Admiral Rozhestvensky was adamant in his defense of his subordinate commanders and maintained total responsibility, pleading guilty to losing the battle. As was expected (and hoped) by the courts, the Tsar commuted the death-sentenced captains to short prison terms and pardons for the remaining officers.

Later life

Rozhestvensky lived out the last years of his life in St Petersburg as a recluse. He died of lung disease and was buried in the Alexander Nevsky monastery.

Historical Viewpoint-Opposing Commanders

The Russian navy had accrued several combat experienced admirals during the war; admirals Oskar Victorovich Stark, Stepan Makarov, and Wilgelm Vitgeft being amongst them. Makarov had been the most promising with his energy, tactics, and his ability to inspire confidence in his subordinates. [22] But by a series of set-backs all of them had been lost to Russia, from one cause or another.

Although Makarov may have been Russia's greatest asset in the war, had he survived, he may not have been the right choice to lead the Baltic Squadron (later redesignated the 2nd Pacific Squadron) to the Far East. Even without fighting experience in the Orient, Admiral Rozhestvensky was the one man with the personality, skill, and determination to sail an untested battleship fleet on an unprecedented voyage to the other side of the world. An observation that Tsar Nicholas had immediately noticed before selecting the admiral.

Rozhestvensky's opponent however, Admiral Togo, had been the adversary of Russia's combat experienced admirals during the current war, but he, unlike his Russian naval counterparts, would be present on the battlefield, to exploit those lessons learned from previous engagements against Rozhestvensky; in the end, leaving him no choice but to fight or retreat.[20]

Honours and awards

Template:Russian

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Pleshakov, photo caption, page not numbered
  2. ^ Рожественский. Several other transliterations are also known in English texts. See Rozhestvensky (disambiguation) for more information.
  3. ^ Watts p. 16
  4. ^ Pleshakov p. 37
  5. ^ Pleshakov p. 59
  6. ^ Pleshakov p. 153, 322
  7. ^ Pleshakov p. 38
  8. ^ Pleshakov p. 53
  9. ^ Pleshakov p. 123
  10. ^ The Russian Outrage (Chapter XXII) - Wood Walter, North Sea Fishers And Fighters, K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co, London, 1911
  11. ^ Connaughton, Richard Michael (1988). The War of the Rising Sun and Tumbling Bear (Digitized by Google Books online). New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 247, 250, 259. ISBN 0-415-07143-7, 9780415071437. Retrieved 2008-12-01. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)
  12. ^ Dogger Bank - Voyage of the Damned ('Hullwebs - History of Hull' website. Retrieved 2007-09-08.)
  13. ^ Joint British-Russian declaration
  14. ^ Dogger Bank Incident Final Report
  15. ^ International Dispute Settlement - Merills, J. G., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University, 1999
  16. ^ Forczyk p. 41-54
  17. ^ a b Mahan p. 456
  18. ^ Mahan p. 450
  19. ^ Mahan, p. 458
  20. ^ a b c Mahan p. 458
  21. ^ [1]
  22. ^ Grant p. 93, 131, 145

References

  • Corbett, Sir Julian. Maritime Operations In The Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905. (1994) Originally classified (unavailable to the public), and in two volumes. ISBN 1-55750-129-7.
  • Forczyk, Robert. Russian Battleship vs Japanese Battleship, Yellow Sea 1904-05. (2009), Osprey; ISBN 978-1-84603-330-8.
  • Grant, R., Captain, D.S.O. BEFORE PORT ARTHUR IN A DESTROYER; The Personal Diary of a Japanese Naval Officer. (1907). London, John Murray, Albemarle St. W.
  • Hough, Richard, A. The Fleet That Had To Die. New York, Ballantine Books. (1960).
  • Mahan, Alfred Thayer. Reflections, Historic and Other, Suggested by the Battle of the Japan Sea. By Captain A. T. Mahan, U.S. Navy. US Naval Proceedings magazine, June 1906; Volume XXXVI, No. 2. US Naval Institute.
  • Novikoff-Priboy, A. Tsushima. (1936) London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd
  • Pleshakov, Constantine. THE TSAR's LAST ARMADA: Epic Voyage to the Battle of Tsushima. (2002). ISBN 0-465-05792-6.
  • Seager, Robert. Alfred Thayer Mahan: The Man And His Letters. (1977) ISBN 0-87021-359-8.
  • Semenoff, Vladimir, Capt. RASPLATA (The Reckoning). (1910). London: John Murray.
  • Semenoff, Vladimir, Capt. THE BATTLE OF TSUSHIMA. (1912). NY E.P. Dutton & Co.
  • Tomitch, V. M. "Warships of the Imperial Russian Navy." Volume 1, Battleships. (1968).
  • Warner, Denis and Peggy. "THE TIDE AT SUNRISE, A History of the Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905." (1975). ISBN 0-7146-5256-3
  • Watts, Anthony J. The Imperial Russian Navy. Arms and Armour, Villiers House, 41-47 Strand, London; 1990. ISBN 0-85368-912-1.

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zinovy_Rozhestvensky&oldid=556010664"