Jump to content

User talk:K6ka: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:K6ka/Archive 17) (bot
Rename over 50k: new section
Line 173: Line 173:


Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience and happy editing --[[Special:Contributions/85.242.133.151|85.242.133.151]] ([[User talk:85.242.133.151|talk]]) 19:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience and happy editing --[[Special:Contributions/85.242.133.151|85.242.133.151]] ([[User talk:85.242.133.151|talk]]) 19:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

== Rename over 50k ==

I'm about to email you about a rename over 50k that needs to be processed. If you have time please coordinate with a developer (does this require a phab ticket now?). You can use "<tt><nowiki>[[Special:Diff/nnn|user request]]</tt>" as the reason for renaming, referring back to this diff. Thanks, –[[User:xeno|<b style="font-family:verdana;color:#000">xeno</b>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:#000">talk</sup>]] 17:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:21, 21 May 2017



If You're Bored

User:Epicgenius/Recent Change

Vandalism information

This is K6ka's Wikipedia user talk page where you can leave messages for K6ka.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:K6ka.

Click here to start a new discussion at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your post using four tildes (~~~~).


This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2017)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Yolanda Saldívar

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Lars von Trier • Chthonic


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Revert

Why did you revert this edit? It is clearly a blatant attack on White People, and is therefore racist.

If anyone made a series called "dear Black People" there would be mass outrage. I disagree with your revert as I think it is perfectly reasonable and not in any way "politically motivated". Something that aims to demonize white people is racist. There is nothing political about it, it is the definition of racist.

Please consider reversing your revert.

178.38.33.8 (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Maybe you should watch the film first before judging it. clpo13(talk) 17:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Wikipedia reports on information, but it does not take sides. Instead, Wikipedia articles should seek to explain the different sides. This is called having a neutral point of view, and it's one of Wikipedia's core policies. To explicitly label something as racist would be to take a side. Note, for example, that the Ku Klux Klan article does not say "The Ku Klux Klan is a racist movement"; it explains what the group does, but does not decide for the reader whether or not such actions are racist. To say that "Some people find the film to be racist", along with reliable sources backing the statement up, is appropriate; to go "Some people find this film to be racist, so it must be racist" is not having a neutral point of view, and is not appropriate here. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there from Portugal,

regarding your message sent to this talk page (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speyer_Cathedral&diff=780863257&oldid=780863086), all i can offer in my defense is that this edit was not performed by me. I edit almost exclusively in association football, if you check the list of contributions closely (here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/193.137.135.2).

Also, this IP which i wrongly thought as static (first contribution other than those by me) is the one from which i edit in my place of work, and i also have this one (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/85.242.133.151) from my home. At 16:56, the IP started with 193 performed that vandalic action, and at that time i was not even at home, of course i cannot offer any evidence to the contrary, you'll just have to believe me :)

This account at the S. Cathedral article, User:MrTS, may very well (i bet it is!) the same "contributor" of the anon edit, as the language is quite vulgar at least in this stuff (check it out here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speyer_Cathedral&diff=next&oldid=780863642"Cona da tua mãe" meaning "Your mother's c*nt" in Portuguese).

Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience and happy editing --85.242.133.151 (talk) 19:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename over 50k

I'm about to email you about a rename over 50k that needs to be processed. If you have time please coordinate with a developer (does this require a phab ticket now?). You can use "<nowiki>user request" as the reason for renaming, referring back to this diff. Thanks, –xenotalk 17:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]