Jump to content

User talk:Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs) at 18:12, 22 September 2016 (→‎September 2016: Disable the right one this time). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Tradicampo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tradicampo Eco Country Houses, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Tradicampo Eco Country Houses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z17 {unblock|The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead, because I didn't notice the "Review Draft" button while creating a draft of the article before publishing it, so next time I will use it before publishing an article and not get blocked again}

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:
The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead, because I didn't notice the "Review Draft" button while creating a draft of the article before publishing it, so next time I will use it before publishing an article and not get blocked again and I will change my username according to the rules.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira | 3=The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead, because I didn't notice the "Review Draft" button while creating a draft of the article before publishing it, so next time I will use it before publishing an article and not get blocked again and I will change my username according to the rules. | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira | reason=The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead, because I didn't notice the "Review Draft" button while creating a draft of the article before publishing it, so next time I will use it before publishing an article and not get blocked again and I will change my username according to the rules. | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Ricardo Peixoto Oliveira | reason=The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead, because I didn't notice the "Review Draft" button while creating a draft of the article before publishing it, so next time I will use it before publishing an article and not get blocked again and I will change my username according to the rules. | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
Do you also understand that you may not promote any business with which you are associated? Please review the best practices for editors with a conflicty of interest. Acroterion (talk) 11:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]