User talk:Contrafool
Welcome!
Hello, Contrafool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Joelito 03:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I like ducks. Contrafool 08:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Chaucer[edit]
My thesis concerns Chaucers and his potential presence in Spain during the undocumented period ending in 1366 (The first document is a safe-passage through Navarre). The field is incredibly muddled with assumtions and unstated references and the majority of the sholarship is written in Córdoba, Spain. If you happen to have a working knowledge of Old French, or some citable source concerning the normal speed of travel during the fourteenth century, I would love to hear from you. I would also be pleased to assist you in any way I am able. -Diabolic 06:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Reminder[edit]
|
This is a reminder to go vote for the Catholic Collaboration Effort. Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration. Current nominations: |
Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment[edit]
Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mira 07:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 04:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Diocesan Infobox[edit]
To the WikiProject Catholicism members
I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!
Hi, I wonder if you might be interested in The Catholic Wiki Project? It's a fairly new Catholic POV wiki. Speculative catholic 02:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Roman Catholic Bishops[edit]
As a member of WikiProject Catholicism I wanted to inform you that some members of Wikipedia believe that most Roman Catholic Bishops do not merit an article on Wikipedia. Since I am unaware of a position on Wikipedia on this matter I decided to bring this to your attention. The three articles on bishops are up for AfD, they are: : John Joseph Nevins , René Henry Gracida , and Felipe de Jesus Estevez Callelinea 20:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Collaboration[edit]
|
|
This is a reminder to go vote for the Catholic Collaboration Effort. Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration. Current nominations: |
Hello Contrafool!
| You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity
The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
|
You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Bishop Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige[edit]
Hello, you are a member of the Wikiproject Catholicism.We would appreciate your help. Please take a look at this article about the catholic bishop Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige . Users deleted sources and tried to force their anti-catholic POV on it. They banned many people that tried to add sources. They didnt block me or Eastmain, but they deleted our sources we gave too. It appears that they don't like this catholic bishop.
Best version until now with 13 sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige&diff=343039227&oldid=343037941
And after deleting the sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige&action=historysubmit&diff=343481960&oldid=343039227
(At first they had planned on deleting the whole article but it didnt work)
Check out at the information on these other wikipedia articles about Seiwert Fleige and compare them to the info that is on there now. You will notice that its quite the oposite:
Thank you --Michelle cannon (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012[edit]
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
Some simple help needed on the new papabili list[edit]
If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 08:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC))
Christologists[edit]
Hello, Erik. I recently created a category to cover the theologians who specialize in the study of the person of Our Lord. A proposal was immediately made to delete it, which was seconded, due to its supposed irrelevance. Would you be willing to add a voice in support of keeping it? Daniel the Monk (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)