User talk:Favre1fan93

Archives

2012 - 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Favre1fan93}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Star Wars: Tales

Hello again. I hope that my comments on Talk:Tales of the Jedi (TV series) do not come across negative or rude. Apologies if that is the case. I can completely understand your perspective and I appreciate your responses. I do not want to come across as disruptive or repetitive or taking up too much space or anything like that in the discussion. I always appreciate discussions on Wikipedia, and I think it is a great platform for people to work together. I just wanted to clarify that and also say that I really enjoy your work on here in general. Aoba47 (talk) 19:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't feel that at all, and I hope I didn't present my response that I did. Appreciate you chiming in on the discussion because there weren't many voices so having more is always helpful. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I did not feel that from your comments either. I just wanted to make sure. I was probably just over-thinking things. I am glad that I could participate in the discussion and hopefully help with it. Aoba47 (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So-called "consensus"

Will you actually link this "consensus" that you are talking about? ภץאคгöร 20:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is WP:IMPLICIT. Look at any MCU film article. None have aggregator prose templates. Editors upon release of a new film always add it because they probably see it used elsewhere, but that doesn't mean it should be used. Templates shouldn't lock article text behind them that can't be edited. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is disputed and reverted though. That's why you don't come to your own conclusions or write unreasonable/inconsistent edit summaries. If there was a consensus that templates were "locking" the texts, they wouldn't be created in the first place. Tomatometer is not an "approval rating", and the template at least sets an example for correct usage and better understanding. What is written in any other article does not determine the content of any other article. (PS. You really should avoid contradicting yourself. Your thinking is that we shouldn't use templates because other MCU articles don't use them [probably because a couple of editors including you remove them for such "reasons"] but also write that "Editors upon release of a new film always add it because they probably see it used elsewhere, but that doesn't mean it should be used." This means we should also not follow other MCU articles because "that doesn't mean it shouldn't be used".) ภץאคгöร 21:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In their current states as of this edit, no MCU film article uses any aggregate prose template. So the use of it on DP&W goes against that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already wrote why this opinion is invalid. Have you read my comments or will you repeat it again? ภץאคгöร 21:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no requirement for articles to use this prose template, and it has been frowned upon for its use in these MCU articles. There is nothing gained by it and nothing lost without it. It is rather easier to just write up the text ourselves and to avoid needles verbiage from the prose template. This is a standard consensus for the MCU articles, so please don't revert back to it as the temp is unnecessary. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this "consensus" you keep talking about? There's nothing gained by copy-pasting the same thing literally over and over again too, just like what a template like this does. It is not different. "Needless verbiage"? "Approval rating" is needless verbiage. ภץאคгöร 07:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is WP:IMPLICIT as previously stated. Not every single thing needs to have a previous discussion; most consensus is just formed through continual editing and establishing it with no dispute. This is one of those instances where there the non-template use works just as well, so there is no issue. Adding it to DP&W goes against that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an automated bot response again. As I've mentioned above, the issue is disputed and reverted, and I already removed the incorrect "approval rating" text that you insistently copy and paste like this template. Choose one thing to be consistent. If you don't want to use the template, you shouldn't copy and paste the same sentence in every MCU article, because then it's no different than using the template. ภץאคгöร 18:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That text is featured on WP:AGG, I see no issue with it. If that wording needs to be updated to alter or remove parts of what's listed there, that a larger discussion for not my talk, nor its use on Deadpool & Wolverine. My main concern is the text and reference not being editable behind the template. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AGG may be showing an outdated, inaccurate and nonrequired example, but that doesn't mean you should copy and paste the same sentence for every article. Then it's kind of like using the template while trying to enforce specific wording (i.e. locking). ภץאคгöร 20:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the same, because the template wording cannot be changed on a page-by-page basis. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, your first clue. Doesn't change anything and still is similar to the template usage. Should let it go. ภץאคгöร 21:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros: Look, if you doubt that there is actually a consensus on the point under dispute, why not just initiate an RfC? BD2412 T 21:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawkeye titles.jpg

Hello again. Could you please rename this to "File:Hawkeye (TV series logo).jpg"? Thanks again in advance! Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The move discussion should conclude first. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With the move consensus in favor of Hawkeye (1994 TV series), could you move this file to that proper title when you get a chance? Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trailblazer101:

Done. Cheers! BD2412 T 17:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Beetle poster.jpg

Heyyo. Could you please rename this to "File:Blue Beetle (film) poster.jpg"? Thank ya kindly again! Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)

Done - adamstom97 (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh! Adam, I think he asked to rename it without leaving a redirect. Otherwise he would've moved it himself. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I checked the above file rename and a redirect was left for that one so I did the same. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually can't move files myself regardless, and I don't mind if a redirect is left or not. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ComicBook.com

Hey, thanks for putting together that article so quickly! After last week's developments, I too was wondering whether it was time to finally turn the redirect into an article. I had actually been thinking about doing so for some time, but just never got to it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah for sure! When there were a few sites talking about the acquisition, I knew at that point there were at least a few outside refs mentioning the site, so it seemed like a good time to get it together. Did just see yesterday that Brandon Davis wasn't able to come to terms on a new contract with them and left, so who knows what will happen with the site and Phase Zero which is a bummer. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that too. We knew something like this could happen, but it's still a shame. Hopefully they can work something out with the Phase Zero podcast. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Hey, I'm not certain about the wording you used for Winderbaum's recent comments. He said it does feel like it fits into The Multiverse Saga but then he said I want to go down this road with you, you know I do, but we're just gonna take a deep breath for a second. That to me is him saying 'yeah, it does seem like it could connect through the multiverse but I'm actually not going to get into that right now', possibly because Marvel hasn't settled on an official position like they have with the Netflix shows. So I think we could say he "felt like it fit within the Multiverse Saga but was unwilling to confirm any details about that at the time". I'm not sure where this bit comes from in the article: "He cautioned though that Marvel Studios was not planning to integrate the series to their Sacred Timeline at that time." - adamstom97 (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97: He cautioned though that Marvel Studios was not planning to integrate the series to their Sacred Timeline at that time. was me trying to interpret this bit: I want to go down this road with you, you know I do, but we're just gonna take a deep breath for a second. I knew we needed some additional statement after it does feel like it fits into The Multiverse Saga and that's what I felt worked, but I'm happy if you want to adjust it. We both agree that it's not confirming it like the Netflix series, so that just needs to be made clear. He had an awkward quote so I tried my best with reworking it into our own words. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good, I just wanted to be on the same page before attempting a c/e. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:X-Men The Animated Series logo.jpg

Hey, could you rename this to the more natural title "File:X-Men The Animated Series logo.jpg" when you get a chance? Thank you again in advance. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox media franchise

Hi @Favre1fan93,

How about adding an optional custom header like this {{{otherheader|Miscellaneous}}}. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox already supports |otherlabel[1-9]= and |otherdata[1-9]= under a Miscellaneous heading. If you want broader support for dedicated box office and budget parameters, you should start a talk page discussion at the infobox talk page here and get consensus. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well i asked your opinion about providing an option to change "Miscellaneous" to the required heading for such cases. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The heading wouldn't need to change. The info you are looking for could currently be placed under said "Micellaneous" heading, or a discussion should be had to create new parameters and heading. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SuperMan The Christopher Reeve Story poster.jpg

Heyyo, could you please rename this to "File:SuperMan The Christopher Reeve Story poster.jpg"? Thank you again in advance! Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]