User talk:Gjh1588

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Response to Peterkingiron[edit]

I wanted to respond to the below comment from the user Peterkingiron about the proposed RF Binder page:

Oppose -- This does not need a separate article: merge it into Ruder Finn. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

While RF Binder is a subsidiary of the Ruder Finn Group, it operates as a separate entity. I feel it needs its own article or page. Is the issue in my wording in the article?

Please let me know so we can move forward. Thanks

Gjh1588 (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The fact that RF Binder is a separate company is no reason for it to have a separate article. The citerion for having a WP article is notability. As there is already an article on Ruder Finn, the question becomes whether Binder is separately notable. I would suggest that aqll material on the Ruder Finn article should be incorporated in one article. WP is not an advertising medium. I am suspicious that the new article offends against WP:ADVERT. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. The page is not meant to be an advertisement or promotional. It's meant to document a notable public relations agency in a neutral tone. As an independent agency that has won awards in a large market, I believe the company merits having its own page. This doesn't seem unusual, as there are other independent public relations agencies with Wikipedia pages.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Gjh1588, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 01:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Gjh1588. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 17:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pol430 talk to me 17:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Re: File:Loews Corp.svg[edit]

Hi, if you're going to upload a new version of Loews' logo to File:Loews Corp.svg, could you please use an edit summary and update the file description page to reflect your source? Because as it is, the file description page is incorrect, which is a big problem with non-free content like these logos. If not, I'm going to have to revert the upload again. Thanks. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al fresco all natural, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gjh1588. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Al fresco all natural".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al fresco all natural}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baskin-Robbins new logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baskin-Robbins new logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan(talk) 02:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RF Binder, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gjh1588. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "RF Binder".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RF Binder}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]