User talk:Jferro67

Jeanpaul Ferro

I have deleted your article at Jeanpaul Ferro because he seems to fail our guideline for notability at WP:BIO. If you can prove that he meets the criteria there, then please recreate the article. However, note that at WP:AUTO, we don't really like people to write articles about themselves. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See, now you've gone and made me have to protect the page from recreation. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe,

I saw there was an entry for me in Wikipedia via the Apple Valley Review, which had a link to my bio, which I followed. Seeing it, I decided to add some links to some of my work available online. I've won and been nominated for several litarary awards, I am a published author with 10 published books under my belt, and I have 500+ publication credits in 9 countries over 20 years. How do I fall into the "not notible" category as it is described for writers? Just wondering. An entry in Wikipedia (Opinion.com, if you ask me) isn't that important. But seeing that someone took the liberty of entering a bio about me I would take it upon myself to at least have it be correct with viable information on it. If you have to be F. Scoot Fitzgerald to be listed by all means keep the listing deleted. But I thought I was following your directions by relisting an entry after the original one was deleted.

Image copyright problem with Image:Waterfire009.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Waterfire009.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of The schemers

A tag has been placed on The schemers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 22:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Providence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Providence.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Newport_Bridge.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Newport_Bridge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jferro67! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 688 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mark Cutler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Schemers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Schemers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Schemers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cmprince (talk) 22:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]