Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-pop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Post-pop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research which would require a ground-level rewrite. Sources provided are not WP:RS. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; searches for the term reveal a handful of references in a musical context, none of which seem to include the genre suggested in this article. It seems that this is WP:OR based on unreliable sources.--SabreBD (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; most sources use last.fm wiki pages, unsourced claims and also lacks reliability. Jonjonjohny (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.