Jump to content

Taser safety issues: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 34: Line 34:
* November 2007, Canada. [[Howard Hyde]] incident.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia/story/2007/11/22/taser-death.html N.S. orders Taser review after inmate's death]</ref>
* November 2007, Canada. [[Howard Hyde]] incident.<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia/story/2007/11/22/taser-death.html N.S. orders Taser review after inmate's death]</ref>
* December 2007, Canada. [[Quilem Registre Taser incident]]
* December 2007, Canada. [[Quilem Registre Taser incident]]
* March 30, 2008, USA. [[Walter E. Haake Jr]] died after being drive-stunned three times in quick succession. Haake's coworkers at the Kansas [[Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company]] plant had suspected that he had a medical condition and called emergency services when he attempted to leave.<ref>[http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/apr/02/shawnee_county_deputies_use_taser_lawrence_man_thr/ Shawnee County deputies use Taser on Lawrence man three times before his death], Scott Rothschild, ''Lawrence Journal-World'', April 2, 2008.</ref>
* April 24, 2008, USA. Kevin Piskura died after being stunned by a X-26 taser for 10 seconds while interfering with a friend's arrest by Police in Oxford, Ohio. He was hospitalized after the confrontation and died five days later. Video and audio of the event was recorded by the X-26. <ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-police_taser_death_webapr25,0,7015156.story</ref>
* April 24, 2008, USA. Kevin Piskura died after being stunned by a X-26 taser for 10 seconds while interfering with a friend's arrest by Police in Oxford, Ohio. He was hospitalized after the confrontation and died five days later. Video and audio of the event was recorded by the X-26. <ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-police_taser_death_webapr25,0,7015156.story</ref>



Revision as of 01:06, 10 May 2008

Tasers used as electroshock weapons became part of routine police work in the United States in the early 1990s. Prior to the 1990s such electrical technology in the hands of law enforcement, now ubiquitous, was extremely rare. Press reports did not focus on this aspect of police intervention, as was the case with Rodney King, where tasers were used. Since then, mass manufactured Tasers became symbols of police brutality, fueling growing controversy over the multiple dangers of their use as a control mechanism against uncooperative or resistant citizens rather than as an alternative in deadly-force situations.[1]

UCLA press conference on taser incidents, 2006

Recognised risks

TASER International has admitted in a training bulletin that repeated blasts of a taser can "impair breathing and respiration". Also, on Taser's website[2] it is stated that, for a subject in a state known as "excited delirium" (a controversial term in itself), repeated or prolonged stuns with the Taser can contribute to "significant and potentially fatal health risks".[3] In such a state, physical restraint by the police coupled with the exertion by the subject are considered likely to result in death or more injuries. Critics say that Electroshock devices are known to burn skin with its electric arc and can damage delicate electrical equipment such as pacemakers.[4] However, a study conducted by the Cleveland Clinic in 2007 on a single animal determined that, a standard five-second TASER X26 application "does not affect the short-term functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators... The long-term effects were not assessed."[5] Template:Electroshock It is assumed that tasers as well as all other high voltage stun devices can cause cardiac arrhythmia in susceptible subjects, possibly leading to heart attack or death in minutes by ventricular fibrillation (which leads to cardiac arrest and if not treated immediately to sudden death).[citation needed] People susceptible to this outcome are sometimes healthy and unaware of their susceptibility.[citation needed]

Critics argue that although the medical conditions or illegal drug-taking among some of the casualties may have been the proximate cause of death, the electric blast of the taser can significantly heighten such risk for subjects in an at-risk category.[6] This suggests that tasers and other electroshock weapons would be dangerous to use on people with certain medical conditions and yet, since police officers will typically not know about a person's medical history or possible drug use, this entails a risk of death with virtually any suspect.

Advantages and disadvantages

Supporters say that electroshock guns are a safer alternative to devices such as firearms. TASER International uses the term "non-lethal" as defined by the United States Department of Defense - which does not mean the weapon cannot cause death, but that it is not intended to be fatal.[7] Non-lethal weapons are defined as "weapons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed so as to incapacitate personnel or material, while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and undesired damage to property and the environment."

Supporters say that electroshock weapons and tasers are more effective than other means including pepper-spray (an eye/breathing irritant), batons or other conventional ways of inflicting pain, even hand guns, at bringing a subject down to the ground with a minimum physical exertion.[8]

Critics, however, charge that police officers who are risk-averse resort to tasers in situations where previously they would have used more conventional, less "extreme" techniques, such as trying to reason with a cornered suspect.[9]

Deaths and injuries

Between June 2001 and June 2007, there were at least 245 cases of deaths of subjects soon after having been shocked using Tasers.[10] Of these cases:

  • In 7 cases, medical examiners said Tasers were a cause or a contributing factor or could not be ruled out as a cause of death.
  • In 16 cases coroners and other officials stated that a taser was a secondary or contributory factor of death.
  • In dozens of cases, coroners cited excited delirium as cause of death. Excited delirium has been questioned as a medical diagnosis.[11]
  • Several deaths occurred as a result of injuries sustained in struggles. In a few of these cases head injury due to falling after being shocked contributed to later death. Some police departments, like that of Clearwater, Florida, have tried to eradicate such incidents by prohibiting taser use when the suspect is in danger of falling.[12]

In 2005, a medical examiner ruled for the first time that a Taser was the primary factor in a death.[13]

Several incidents have received large publicity:

According to TASER International, tasers are intended “to incapacitate dangerous, combative, or high-risk subjects who pose a risk to law enforcement officers, innocent citizens, or themselves”.[18]

Tasers are illegal or subject to legal restrictions on their availability and use in many jurisdictions.

Police officers in at least five US states have filed lawsuits against TASER International claiming they suffered serious injuries after being shocked with the device during training classes. [3]

The UN Committee Against Torture (CAT), an agency charged with overseeing the application of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, arrived at the conclusion on Friday, November 23, 2007, that the use of the electric pulse Taser gun constitutes a "form of torture" and "can even provoke death."

Fire risk

Tasers come with express instructions not to use them where flammable liquids or fumes may be present, such as filling stations or by police raiding methamphetamine labs, as tasers, like other electric devices, have been found to ignite flammable materials.

An evaluative study carried out by the British Home Office investigated the potential for tasers to ignite CS gas. Seven trials were conducted, in which CS gas canisters containing methyl isobutyl ketone (a solvent used in all CS sprays utilized by the United Kingdom police) were sprayed over mannequins wearing street clothing. The tasers were then fired at the mannequins. In two of the seven trials, "the flames produced were severe and engulfed the top half of the mannequin, including the head". This poses a particular problem for law enforcement, as some police departments approve the use of CS before the use of a taser. [19]

Use in schools and on children

Police officers that patrol schools, including grade schools, in several U.S. states (including Kansas, Minnesota, Kentucky, and Florida), currently carry tasers. In 2004, the parents of a 6-year old boy in Miami sued the police department for tasering their child. The police said the boy was threatening to injure his own leg with a shard of glass, and claimed that using the taser was the only option to stop the boy from injuring himself. TASER International asserts that the taser is safe for use on anyone weighing 60 pounds (27 kg) or more. Nevertheless, the boy's mother told CNN that the three officers involved might have found it easier to reason with her child. Two weeks later, a 12-year-old girl skipping school was tasered in Miami-Dade.[20]

Supporters of taser use in schools argue that merely switching on the device, and threatening to use it, can be effective in frightening violent or uncooperative students into desisting from inappropriate behaviour, if verbal reprimands have not succeeded. Critics counter that tasers may interact with preexisting medical complications such as medications, and may even contribute to someone's death as a result. Thus, critics say, they should either be prohibited altogether in schools, or classified as possibly lethal weapons and as a consequence, should be regulated very tightly. Critics also argue that using a taser on a minor, and especially a young child, is effectively cruel and abusive punishment, and therefore it should be banned on the same grounds that other, older forms of physical punishment such as canings have been banned from use in many schools. [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

Notable taser deaths

In October and November 2007, four individuals died after being tasered in Canada, leading to calls for review of its use. The highest-profile of these cases was that of Robert Dziekański, a non-English speaking man from Poland who died in less than two minutes after being tasered by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) at the Vancouver International Airport, October 14, 2007.[26][27] The tasering was captured on home video and was broadcast nationally.[28] This was followed by three further death-after-Tasering incidents in Montreal, Halifax, Nova Scotia, and Chilliwack, British Columbia, leading Amnesty International to demand Taser use end in Canada, as it had records of 16 other such deaths in the country.[29] On November 18, 2007, a 20-year-old man in Frederick, Maryland fell unconscious and died also right after being tasered.[30]

On December 12, 2007, in response to the death of Robert Dziekański, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day requested that the federal Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (CPC) prepare recommendations for immediate implementation. The CPC report recommended to "immediately restrict the use of the conducted energy weapon (CEW)" by reclassifying it as an "impact weapon."[31]

A 2004 CBS News report described 70 deaths believed to be caused by the Taser, including 10 in August 2004 alone.[32] At that time Amnesty International has reported this number at 150 since June 2001,[33] including the case of Robert Guerrero, 21, of Texas, who died after being tasered by police while hiding after illegally hooking up electrical equipment.[34]

Tools of political suppression

Tasers and other electroshock weapons have been used at political protests such as those by the anti-globalization movement in France, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, and several other countries. Members of the movement, as well as world press are concerned that the technology, and other "less-lethal" weapons, are likely to become tools for suppressing legitimate protest associated with imposition of "neo-liberal economic policies".[35] Thomas Gebauer, of the German non-governmental organisation Medico International, describes "non-lethal weapons" as a symbol of "the growing repressive character of European and North American governments" willing to suppress protests against the spreading social injustice. According to Gebauer, "the aim of these weapons is to guarantee social borders, to install perennial control of movements, to restrict democracy."[35]

Torture

The United Nations Committee against Torture reported that the use of Tasers can be a form of torture, due to the acute pain they cause, and warns against the possibility of death in certain cases. [36] [37] Amnesty International has reported several alleged cases of excessive electroshock gun use, that possibly amount to torture, including the death of an individual after being struck 12 times with a Taser in Orange County, Florida.[38] They have also raised extensive concerns about the use of other electro-shock devices by American police and in American prisons, as they can be (and according to Amnesty International, sometimes are) used to inflict cruel pain on individuals. For example, Eric Hammock of Texas died in April 2005 after receiving more than 20 taser shocks by Fort Worth police officers.[39] Maurice Cunningham of South Carolina was subjected to continuous shock for 2 minutes 49 seconds, which a medical examiner said caused cardiac arrhythmia and his subsequent death. He was 29 years old and had no alcohol or drugs in his system.[40]

Tasers may also not leave the telltale markings that a conventional beating might. The American Civil Liberties Union has also raised concerns about their use.[41]

References

  1. ^ Darius M. Rejali, associate professor of Political Science, Reed College, Technological Invention and Diffusion of Torture EquipmentPortland, OR, August, 1998.
  2. ^ TASER International, Inc., homepage.[1]
  3. ^ a b Steven DiJoseph (November 21, 2005). "Arizona Sheriff Announces Test of Alternative to Taser Stun Gun" (reprint).
  4. ^ Study Shows Tasers Pose Potential Risks for Pacemaker Patients: Weapons May Cause Arrhythmias in Patients With Cardiac Devices May 11, 2007
  5. ^ Lakkireddy D, Khasnis A, Antenacci J; et al. (2007). "Do electrical stun guns (TASER-X26) affect the functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators?". Europace. 9 (7): 551–6. doi:10.1093/europace/eum058. PMID 17491105. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ USA Amnesty International’s concerns about Taser use, Statement to the U.S. Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody Accessed on December 2, 2007
  7. ^ Police stun-gun may be lethal, firm admits October 3, 2005
  8. ^ TASER International, Inc., homepage.[2]
  9. ^ The Taser Effect: Two years after HPD armed itself with the stun guns, questions linger over how and how often the weapon is being used Jan 14, 2007
  10. ^ County police getting Tasers May 23, 2007
  11. ^ Death by Excited Delirium: Diagnosis or Coverup? February 26, 2007
  12. ^ Another Taser Death - In Clearwater April 07, 2006
  13. ^ Taser shocks ruled cause of death, by Robert Anglen, The Arizona Republic, July 30, 2005. Accessed November 25, 2007.
  14. ^ Terror police 'shot' man in coma, BBC News, 15 November 2007
  15. ^ Youth, 17, dies after police Taser incident Oct. 31, 2006
  16. ^ N.S. orders Taser review after inmate's death
  17. ^ http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-police_taser_death_webapr25,0,7015156.story
  18. ^ About TASER
  19. ^ Safety flaw in police's new gun December 9, 2001
  20. ^ CNN, Susan Candiotti, contributor. Police review policy after Tasers used on kids November 15, 2004
  21. ^ Police Use Taser On 12-Year-Old On School Bus: Police Say Boy Threatened, Assaulted Officer June 10, 2005
  22. ^ Kansas Students Speak Out Against Tasers In Schools Apr. 6, 2006
  23. ^ Teen dies after being shot by stun gun Nov. 1, 2006
  24. ^ Tasers Implicated in Excited Delirium Deaths - NPR February 27, 2007
  25. ^ More UK Police to be equipped with TASERs 16 May 2007
  26. ^ Witness blames RCMP, Vancouver airport for death of Tasered man
  27. ^ CTV.ca | New details emerge in Vancouver airport death
  28. ^ Taser video shows RCMP shocked immigrant within 25 seconds of their arrival
  29. ^ AFP: Fourth Taser gun death in Canada: police
  30. ^ Man dies after police jolt him with stun gun - CNN.com
  31. ^ "RCMP watchdog releases report on Taser use". CTV News. December 12, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-12.
  32. ^ TASER Danger?, 70 Deaths After Use Of Stun Gun Lead To Questions Over Its Safety - CBS News
  33. ^ Man dies after police jolt him with stun gun - CNN.com
  34. ^ Police back Tasers despite deaths
  35. ^ a b Julio Godoy, IPS, Paris, 'Non-lethal Weapons' Tackle Protests Several European governments are arming their police forces with a new range of "non-lethal weapons" to put down protests against globalisation and among immigrants. Accessed December 2, 2007
  36. ^ Committee against Torture Concludes Thirty-Ninth Session, press release, United Nations Office at Geneva, November 23, 2007. Accessed 26 November 2007
  37. ^ Tasers a form of torture, says UN, The Daily Telegraph, November 24, 2007.
  38. ^ USA - Amnesty International 2003
  39. ^ "Electro-shock weapons", Supplementary Briefing to the UN Committee Against Torture, Chapter 9.1., p.38, USA Amnesty International, AI Index: AMR 51/061/2006
  40. ^ Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about taser use 2006
  41. ^ ACLU Taser search

See also