User talk:Jonathan Versen

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jonathan Versen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --- Responses to Chazz's talk page. Signed by Chazz @ 11:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Kasparov_vs_Deep_Blue-97.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kasparov_vs_Deep_Blue-97.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:S&M/Crane merge[edit]

Good idea, I think there should only be a Crane-Simplex article mostly because it was the last of the S&M/Crane legacy. S&M should still be listed in the US Defunct autos section, and can redirect to Crane-Simplex. Unfortunately information for Smith & Mabley, the Simplex, Crane and Crane-Simplex is hard to find, so I feel it is more convenient if they are all in one article.

Haleh Esfandiari[edit]

Read your edit again. Still doesn't look right. Too many things happened in that event to fit into one sentence easily, I guess. Badagnani 04:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I tried a 2nd fix. Ordinarily I try to avoid semi-colons, but I thought it looked ok. versen 05:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eloge de l'amour[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Eloge de l'amour, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: In Praise of Love. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving[edit]

Hey, to move a page to a new title, please use the "move" button at the top of the page, next to the history and edit links. That keeps the history intact, which is required by copyright law. I am getting the copy and paste moved article deleted, then I will properly move and disambig afterwards. You can see the instructions on moving here. Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irving Ravetch[edit]

A tag has been placed on Irving Ravetch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jamiebijania (talk) 07:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tri-College Consortium[edit]

The article Tri-College Consortium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]