User talk:Mario-Central2
Proposed deletion of Mario Central Portal[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mario Central Portal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tgies (talk) 01:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mario Central Portal[edit]
I have nominated Mario Central Portal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Central Portal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. tgies (talk) 04:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Mario Central Portal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Mario Central Portal and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Reyk YO! 14:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mario Central Portal[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mario Central Portal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Q T C 02:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Mario Central Portal Vista.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Mario Central Portal Vista.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Q T C 02:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mario Central Portal[edit]
I have nominated Mario Central Portal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Central Portal (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Q T C 22:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Q T C 22:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Crash Bash 2[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Crash Bash 2, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Crash Bash 2[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Crash Bash 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Video game that may or may not be released more than 4 years in the future. Link to dead page as only source.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wperdue (talk) 04:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Crash Bash 2[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Crash Bash 2, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash Bash 2. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Crash Bash 2[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Crash Bash 2. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash Bash 2. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Tag removal[edit]
Please do not remove the AFD notification from the Crash Bash 2 page. A hangon tag is not necessary as it is not nominated for speedy deletion. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)wperdue
Speedy deletion nomination of Affiliate link[edit]
A tag has been placed on Affiliate link, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Crash Bash 2. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Crash Bash 2, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do NOT remove AFD tags. A hangon tag is not appropriate for this. Wperdue (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Crash Bash 2, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wperdue (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Repost of Crash Bash 2[edit]
A tag has been placed on Crash Bash 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Joe Chill (talk) 02:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- You can't source a conversation. If a source was never actually published, then it's not verifiable. That is, you can never prove that it happened, and regardless, the game would still fail the standard of notability and be deleted. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)