Template talk:Taiwan topics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Suggested move: fix format of request |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
== Suggested move == |
== Suggested move == |
||
{{requested move/dated| |
{{requested move/dated|Template talk:Taiwan topics}} |
||
[[Template:Republic of China (Taiwan) topics]] → [[ |
[[Template talk:Republic of China (Taiwan) topics]] → [[Template talk:Taiwan topics]] – to match the template. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 21:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
*This one is just technical, so I think it can be G6'd, assuming no one objects. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner|talk]]) 00:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
*This one is just technical, so I think it can be G6'd, assuming no one objects. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner|talk]]) 00:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:41, 8 April 2012
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Taiwan Template‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2007 April 21. The result of the discussion was "Keep". |
Size of the fonts
I am hoping to get the fontsize smaller. Can someone help me with that? Mababa 06:03, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Sub-categories
I am hoping to put all the sub categories into this template in the future for easy reference, too. Mababa 06:04, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
categories
Hmmm, the template belongs to no categories, but the discussion page does. Hmmm. (I was looking for a way to find similar templates.) Jidanni 00:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Adding (Taiwan) to the ROC
Please refer to Template_talk:Politics_of_the_Republic_of_China--pyl (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Most of contents in this Template describe as Taiwan in chief~ not only politic! This is just a web-encyclopedia,The main purpose should made readers to be clear about the matter for this subject. we should stand an angle of vision for readers who might disunderstand, not only to edit by your own position,but also have misgiving about other readers.--ILVTW (talk) 06:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
template has too much
The template should focus on the ROC, not on Taiwan. The ROC is the government. The "Administration" section should stay. The ROC as a government had a history in China before moving to Taiwan, so a "History" section should be present. Most of what is in the Society, Culture, Economy and Geography sections should be in Template:Taiwan topics rather than here. Readin (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think the economy stuff and some of the culture stuff (particularly cinema, media, music, sports, things like that—entertainment-related stuff) could still stay, as it's more related to the country that is the ROC, rather than the hunk of rock that is Taiwan. Same for society, a few things (such as LGBT rights) could probably stay, while others could go. I imagine all of the geography stuff could go. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- The cinema grew up in Taiwan and started during Japanese sovereignty. It is Taiwanese much more than Republican or Chinese. Media, music, sports and things like that also have their roots in Taiwan, not in Republican China. They are more Taiwanese than Republican Chinese. Readin (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Content duplication with Template:Taiwan topics
These two templates have a fairly significant amount of duplication. With the country article now located at Taiwan, I believe Template:Taiwan topics should be the main country template and the majority of this template's content should be there (and much of it already is). However, once the country-related links are stripped, there's basically only the administration section left in this template. Do people think there's enough content related to the Republic of China (the government, as distinct from the country of Taiwan) to justify it keeping a separate template, or should the government items be merged into Template:Taiwan topics and have that serve as the main template for both purposes? Personally I'm in favour of the latter. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 22:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, it makes sense to get rid of the ROC template and merging relevant content with the Taiwan one. John Smith's (talk) 08:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Same here, although I personally have not recently seen the "Taiwan" template, assuming it is similar to the ROC one, along with the fact that, well, the moves were made, there should be no reason not to. JPECH95 20:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree. There are many topics that aren't related to Taiwan at all, or span across a longer timeframe that predates the lost of the Chinese mainland. Jeffrey (202.189.98.142) (talk) 22:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Null? Jeffrey (talk) 11:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes? – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 19:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes? – NULL ‹talk›
- Hello Null? Jeffrey (talk) 11:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Please put the merge on hold. As I have said, some topics don't belong to the Taiwan template. Jeffrey (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Suggested move
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Template:Taiwan topics be renamed and moved to Template talk:Taiwan topics. This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Template to Template talk namespace. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Template talk:Republic of China (Taiwan) topics → Template talk:Taiwan topics – to match the template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- This one is just technical, so I think it can be G6'd, assuming no one objects. Kauffner (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. What's the point to move the template to a talk page? Jeffrey (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)