Cryptic species complex
- "Cryptic species" redirects here, not to be confused with Cryptid, a supposed or imagined creature whose existence is not scientifically recognised.
||It has been suggested that this article be merged into species complex. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2014.|
In scientific classification, a cryptic species complex is a group of organisms that are typically very closely related yet their precise classification and relationships cannot be easily determined.
The component species of a cryptic species complex may be parapatric, are frequently sympatric, and are sometimes allopatric. Cryptic species complexes are not the same as populations undergoing speciation: they typically represent a situation where speciation has already broken the gene flow between populations, but where evolution has not progressed to a point where easily recognizable adaptations have taken place.
Cryptic species may be somewhat more distantly related and simply represent lineages that have been so successful as to require little evolutionary change, possibly coupled with parallel evolution. A famous example are the Eurasian Treecreeper and Short-toed Treecreeper. These birds were perhaps the first cryptic species to be recognized as such (by Christian Ludwig Brehm in 1820). Other ornithologists refused to accept that more than one species was involved until Brehm presented his bioacoustic studies, which left no room for doubt. The European Treecreeper has since been found to be a very close relative of the Himalayan Hodgson's Treecreeper, while the Short-toed Treecreeper is probably the sister species of the North American Brown Creeper. Cryptic species are also common in certain families of insects such as Chironomidae.
The members of a cryptic species might or might not constitute a superspecies; in other words, they might appear very similar but not be very closely related.
Recognition of cryptic species
Usually, when a cryptic species complex has been discovered, the individual species within the complex are separated by analysing data from multiple sources, such as by comparing polytene chromosomes, DNA sequence analyses, bioacoustics and thorough life history studies.
|Examples of cryptic species|
Evolutionary and ecological interpretation
Where cryptic species coexist in sympatry, it is often a particular challenge to understand how these similar species persist without outcompeting each other. Niche partitioning is one mechanism invoked to explain this. Studies in some species complexes indeed suggest that species divergence went in par with ecological differentiation, with species now preferring different microhabitats.
It has been suggested that cryptic species complexes are very common in the marine environment. Although this suggestion came before the detailed analysis of many systems using DNA sequence data, it has been proven correct. The increased use of DNA sequence in the investigation of organismal diversity (also called Phylogeography and DNA barcoding) has led to the discovery of a great many cryptic species complexes in all habitats. In the marine bryozoan Celleporella hyalina, detailed morphological analyses and mating compatibility tests between the isolates identified by DNA sequence analysis were used to confirm that these groups consisted of more than 10 ecologically distinct species that had been diverging for many million years.
Evidence from the identification of cryptic species has led some[who?] to conclude that current estimates of global species richness are too low. For example, mitochondrial DNA research published in January 2008 suggests that there are at least 11 genetically distinct populations of giraffes. Similar methods also found that the Amazonian frog Eleutherodactylus ockendeni is actually at least 3 different species that diverged over 5 million years ago.
When a species is found to comprise in fact several phylogenetically distinct species, each of these typically have smaller distribution ranges and population sizes than reckoned before.
Disease and pathogen control
Pests, species causing diseases, and their vectors, have direct importance for humans. When they are found to be cryptic species complexes, the ecology and virulence of each of these species needs to be reevaluated to devise appopriate control strategies. An example are cryptic species in the malaria vector Anopheles, or the fungi causing cryptococcosis.
- Int Panis L, Kiknadze I, Bervoets L, Aimanova A (1994). "Karyological identification of some species of the genus Chironomus Meigen, 1803 from Belgium". Bulletin et Annales de la Societé Royale Belge d'Entomologie (Belgium) 130: 135–142.
- Кикнадзе ИИ, Михайлова П, Истомина АГ, Голыгина ВВ, Инт Панис Л, Крастанов Б (2006). "Хромосомный полиморфизм и дивергенция популяций у Chironomus nuditarsis Str. (Diptera, Chironomidae) [The chromosomal polymorphism and divergence of populations in Chironomus nuditarsis Str. (Diptera, Chironomidae]". Tsitologia (in Russian) 48: 595–609.
- Roca AL, Georgiadis N, Pecon-Slattery J, O'Brien SJ. (2001). "Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa". Science 293 (5534): 1473–1477. doi:10.1126/science.1059936. PMID 11520983.
- Steinfartz S, Veith M, Tautz D. (2000). "Mitochondrial sequence analysis of Salamandra taxa suggests old splits of major lineages and postglacial recolonizations of Central Europe from distinct source populations of Salamandra salamandra". Molecular Ecology 9 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00870.x.
- Geml J, Tulloss RE, Laursen GA, Sasanova NA, Taylor DL. (2008). "Evidence for strong inter- and intracontinental phylogeographic structure in Amanita muscaria, a wind-dispersed ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48 (2): 694–701. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.029. PMID 18547823.
- Salvini D, Fineschi S, Pastorelli R, Sebastiani F, Vendramin GG. (2006). "Absence of geographic structure in European populations of Rubus fruticosus L. complex using chloroplast DNA microsatellites". Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131 (5): 616–621.
- Knowlton N (1993). "Sibling species in the sea". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24 (1): 189–216. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001201. ISSN 0066-4162.
- Knowlton N. (February 2000). "Molecular genetic analyses of species boundaries in the sea". Hydrobiologia 420 (1): 73–90. doi:10.1023/A:1003933603879. ISSN 0018-8158.
- Gómez A, Wright PJ, Lunt DH, Cancino JM, Carvalho GR, Hughes RN. (2007). "Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (1607): 199–207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3718. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 1685843. PMID 17035167.
- "Giraffes and frogs provide more evidence of new species hidden in plain sight". Science Daily. January 2008.
- Brown D, Brenneman R, Koepfli K-P, Pollinger J, Mila B, Georgiadis N, Louis E, Grether G, Jacobs D, Wayne R. (2007). "Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe". BMC Biology 5: 57. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-57. ISSN 1741-7007. PMC 2254591. PMID 18154651.
- Elmer K, Davila J, Lougheed S. (2007). "Cryptic diversity and deep divergence in an upper Amazonian leaflitter frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni". BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 247. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-247. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 2254618. PMID 18154647.
- Shellee Morehead, Jon Seger, Don Feener and Brian Brown, A cryptic species complex in the ant parasitoid Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae) - Invalid Link