Drug Policy Alliance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2009) |
 |
This article may not meet the general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged or deleted. (March 2009) |
The Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) is a New York City-based non-profit organization with the principal goal of ending the American "War on Drugs". Its goals include nationwide availability of medicinal marijuana, the creation of drug-related public health measures, ending abuses of asset forfeiture, repealing non-violent drug sentences, repealing laws that deny public benefits to people convicted of drug crimes, and the advancement of drug education programs by redirecting most government drug control resources from criminal justice and interdiction to public health and education. The Drug Policy Alliance's executive director is Ethan Nadelmann. The Drug Policy Alliance was formed when the Drug Policy Foundation and the Lindesmith Center merged in 2000.[1]
The DPA was the guiding force behind California's recent law Proposition 36. "Prop 36" and the formation of the Drug Courts gave non-violent drug offenders the opportunity to seek treatment in drug rehabilitation programs rather than serve lengthy jail sentences. The Drug Courts also removed unlicensed drug rehabs as options for fulfilling probation requirements, a bold move as unlicensed rehabs were plentiful in California (like Futures Foundation, Inc., in San Jose, California.)
The Drug Policy Foundation, founded in 1986, had office in Washington, D.C, advocated for drug policies which include harm reduction–policies, drug laws as in Holland, laws allowing doctors to maintain an addict with a low dose of the additive drug and legalization–making drugs similar to U.S. alcohol laws. [2]
Contents |
[edit] Criticism
A criticism of Prop 36 is that it is not retroactive, persons who had to use unlicensed rehabs prior to the formation of the Drug Courts are not able to have their convictions reheard in court.
[edit] References
- ^ "About the Drug Policy Alliance". Drug Policy Alliance. http://www.drugpolicy.org/about/. Retrieved on 2007-09-02.
- ^ A Guide to the Drug-Legalization Movement: Drug Policy Foundation
[edit] See also
- Americans For Safe Access
- Freedom of thought
- Decriminalization of marijuana in the United States
- Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
- Marijuana Policy Project
- NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws)
- Students for Sensible Drug Policy
