Imidacloprid effects on bees
Imidacloprid is a nicotine-derived systemic insecticide, belonging to a group of pesticides called neonicotinoids. Although it is off patent, the primary producer of imidacloprid is the German chemical firm Bayer CropScience. The trade names for imidacloprid include Gaucho, Admire, Merit, Advantage, Confidor, Provado, and Winner. Imidacloprid is a neurotoxin that is selectively toxic to insects relative to vertebrates and most non-insect invertebrates. It acts as an agonist on the postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of motor neurones in insects. This interaction results in convulsions, paralysis, and eventually death of the poisoned insect. It is effective on contact and via stomach action. Because imidacloprid binds much more strongly to insect neuron receptors than to mammal neuron receptors, this insecticide is selectively more toxic to insects than mammals. As a systemic pesticide, imidacloprid translocates or moves readily in the xylem of plants from the soil into the leaves, fruit, flowers, pollen, nectar, and guttation fluid of plants. Bees may be exposed to imidacloprid when they feed on the nectar, pollen, and guttation fluid of imidacloprid-treated plants.
Experts believe that imidacloprid is one of many possible causes of bee decline and the recent bee malady termed colony collapse disorder (CCD). In 2011, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, no single factor alone is responsible for the malady, however honey bees are thought to possibly be affected by neonicotinoid chemicals existing as residues in the nectar and pollen which bees forage on. The scientists studying CCD have tested samples of pollen and have indicated findings of a broad range of substances, including insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides. They note that while the doses taken up by bees are not lethal, they are concerned about possible chronic problems caused by long-term exposure.
In January 2013, the European Food Safety Authority stated that neonicotinoids pose an unacceptably high risk to bees, and that the industry-sponsored science upon which regulatory agencies' claims of safety have relied may be flawed, concluding that, "A high acute risk to honey bees was identified from exposure via dust drift for the seed treatment uses in maize, oilseed rape and cereals. A high acute risk was also identified from exposure via residues in nectar and/or pollen." An author of a Science study prompting the EESA review suggested that industry science pertaining to neonicotinoids may have been deliberately deceptive, and the UK Parliament has asked manufacturer Bayer Cropscience to explain discrepancies in evidence they have submitted to an investigation.
April 2013 the EU decided to restrict thiamethoxam and clothianidin along with imidacloprid.
Imidacloprid was first registered in the United Kingdom in 1993 and in the United States and France in 1994. In the mid to late 1990s, French beekeepers reported a significant loss of bees, which they attributed to the use of imidacloprid. In 1999, the French Minister of Agriculture suspended the use of imidacloprid on sunflower seeds and appointed a team of expert scientists to examine the impact of imidacloprid on bees. In 2003, this panel, referred to as the Comité Scientifique et Technique (CST, or Scientific and Technical Committee) issued a 108-page report, which concluded that imidacloprid poses a significant risk to bees. In 2004, the French Minister of Agriculture suspended the use of imidacloprid as a seed treatment for maize (corn). Despite these bans, colony collapse disorder still is occurring.
Like most insecticides, imidacloprid is highly toxic to bees, with a contact acute LD50 = 0.078μg a.i./bee and an acute oral LD50 = 0.0039μg a.i./bee. Imidacloprid was first widely used in the United States in 1996 as it replaced 3 broad classes of insecticides. In 2006, U.S. commercial migratory beekeepers reported sharp declines in their honey bee colonies. This has happened in the past, however unlike previous losses, adult bees were abandoning their hives. Scientists named this phenomenon colony collapse disorder (CCD). Reports show that beekeepers in most states have been affected by CCD. Although no single factor has been identified as causing CCD, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in their progress report on CCD stated that CCD may be "a syndrome caused by many different factors, working in combination or synergistically."
In a British parliamentary inquiry in 2012, the Environmental Audit Committee accused European regulators of ignoring evidence of imidacloprid risk to bees. The committee said that imidacloprid data available in the regulators' own assessment report shows "unequivocally that imidacloprid breaks down very slowly in soil, so that concentrations increase significantly year after year with repeated use, accumulating to concentrations very likely to cause mass mortality in most soil-dwelling animal life." The committee submitted a lengthy list of failings in current regulations including concerns that current regulations were set up for pesticide sprays, not systemic chemicals like imidacloprid that is used to treat seeds. They also expressed concern that only effects on honeybees have been considered despite the fact that 90% of pollination is carried out by different species, such as bumblebees, butterflies, moths and other insects. The environment minister responded saying that he is presently "...satisfied that the that [European regulatory system] is working properly."
Toxicity of imidacloprid to bees
Imidacloprid is one of the most toxic insecticides to the western honeybee, Apis mellifera. The toxicity of imidacloprid to Apis mellifera differs from most insecticides in that it is more toxic orally than by contact. The contact acute LD50 is 0.024 µg a.i./bee (micrograms of active ingredient per bee). The acute oral LD50 ranges from 0.005 µg a.i./bee to 0.07 µg a.i./bee, which makes imidacloprid more toxic to the bees than the organophosphate dimethoate (oral LD50 0.152 µg/bee) or the pyrethroid cypermethrin (oral LD50 0.160 µg/bee). Other insecticides that are equally or more toxic than imidacloprid include spinosad, emamectin benzoate, fipronil, and the neonicotinoids clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran.
The majority of studies that measure toxicity of pesticides to Apis mellifera honeybees focus on estimating the lethal dose (LD50) in acute toxicity tests to adult honeybees. This is only a partial measure of the harmful effects that pesticides can have on bees. For a complete analysis of the impact of pesticides to bees, sublethal effects should be considered.
Dozens of research articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals, which show sublethal effects to adult bees exposed to low levels of imidacloprid. In these studies, sub-lethal doses of 1-24μg/kg and 0.1 - 20 ng/bee have been shown to impair navigation, foraging behavior, feeding behavior, and olfactory learning performance in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Other studies examining higher levels of imidacloprid (50 - 500 ppb) also found that imidacloprid decreases foraging activity and affects bee mobility and communication capacity.
A 2012 in situ study sought to recreate hypothesized conditions of the initial outbreak of CCD in 2006/2007 by feeding honey bees high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) that the researchers laced with varying sub-lethal amounts of imidacloprid assumed to have been present in HFCS feed at the time. All but one of the colonies exposed to imidacloprid perished between 13 and 23 weeks post imidacloprid dosing, providing evidence that long-term sub-lethal exposure to the neonicotinoid causes honey bees to exhibit symptoms consistent with CCD months after exposure.
In 10-day chronic feeding studies with honeybees (Apis mellifera), 50% mortality was reached at levels between 0.1 and 10 ug/kg imidacloprid. Other chronic toxicity studies conducted by Moncharmont et al. (2003) and Decourtye et al. (1999) have demonstrated chronic NOAEC values of <4 ppb and 4 ppb, respectively in honeybees. In bumble bees, Mommaerts et al. (2009) demonstrated a LOAEC of 10 ppb for imidacloprid.
Many tunnel and field studies have been conducted to show the potential effects of imidacloprid in the natural environment however most of these field studies have design and implementation deficiencies, which make them difficult to interpret and use.
In 2012, researchers announced findings that sublethal exposure to imidacloprid rendered honey bees significantly more susceptible to infection by the fungus Nosema, thereby suggesting a potential link to CCD. Two research teams led by Jeff Pettis at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Cedric Alaux at INRA/France have demonstrated that interactions between the pathogen Nosema and imidacloprid significantly weaken the immune systems of honeybees (Apis mellifera). In their research, Alaux et al. (2010) found that bees infected with Nosema and exposed to 0.7 ug/kg imidacloprid had an increased rate of mortality compared to the controls. The combination of Nosema and imidacloprid also significantly decreased the activity of glucose oxidase, an important enzyme that allows the bees to sterilize their colony and brood food. Without this enzyme, bees can become more susceptible to infections by pathogens. Both the USDA study and the INRA study demonstrate that a combination of stressors (pesticides and pathogens) may be responsible for the recent high level of bee losses.
Bayer CropScience studies show that the maximum dose of imidacloprid for which no adverse effects were observed in bees is 20 ppb. Since Bayer claims that residue levels are usually below 5 ppb in pollen and nectar, they contend that imidacloprid poses a negligible risk to bees.
Gerard Eyries, marketing manager for Bayer's agricultural division in France, states that studies confirm that imidacloprid leaves a small residue in nectar and pollen, but there is no evidence of a link with the drop in France's bee population, adding, "It is impossible to have zero residue. What is important is to know whether the very tiny quantities which have been found have a negative effect on bees." He also added that the product was sold in 70 countries with no reported side effects.
- 10 to 20 ppb in upper leaves
- 100 to 200 ppb in other leaves
- 1.5 ppb in nectar
- 2 to 70 ppb in pollen
It is important to note that the majority of studies conducted on pollinators have been performed in adult honeybees (Apis mellifera). Very few studies have been conducted on wild bees, most of which are solitary and raise their young in burrows and small colonies. There are also few studies that have been conducted on brood, larvae, or the queen, making it difficult to determine the impact of pesticides on different members of the colony and life stages of the bee. Although a number of field and semi-field studies have been conducted on imidacloprid and bees, these studies have design and implementation deficiencies, which make them unusable. Thus, the chronic effects of imidacloprid in the field are still unknown.
Events in the decline of bees
In 2003, French Agricultural Minister Jean Glavany again extended the suspension of the use of imidacloprid on sunflower seeds. In spite of a four-year ban on sunflower seed treatment, a significant drop in bee losses was not observed. Beekeepers were cited as saying the measure was insufficient since residue studies found that imidacloprid accumulates in soil and leaves a residue. Even after five years, plants sowed on the same spot as the crop could contain traces of the product.
Some also pointed out that bee colony losses could also be due to the use of imidacloprid on other crops such as corn, or from the replacement of imidacloprid by another systemic insecticide called fipronil. Fipronil is as toxic to honeybees on an acute oral basis as imidacloprid. Indeed in May 2003, the DGAL (Direction Générale de l'Alimentation du ministère de l'Agriculture ) indicated death of bees observed in the south of the country had been caused by acute toxicity by fipronil (trade name Regent). Not until beekeepers stopped using imidacloprid and fipronil did the bee population rebound in France.
In June 2008, the German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety suspended the registration of eight neonicotinoid pesticide seed treatment products used in oilseed rape (canola) and sweetcorn, a few weeks after honeybee keepers in the southern state of Baden Württemberg reported a wave of honeybee deaths linked to one of the pesticides, clothianidin.
In August 2008, the Coalition against Bayer Dangers (CBG) brought a legal case against Werner Wenning, Bayer's chairman, for marketing dangerous pesticides (neonicotinoids), which are causing the death of bees worldwide.
In November 2010, an EPA document was released, detailing the risks to honeybees from exposure to clothianidin, a neonicotinoid similar to imidacloprid. The EPA document states: "This compound is toxic to honey bees. The persistence of residues and potential residual toxicity of clothianidin in nectar and pollen suggests the possibility of chronic toxic risk to honey bee larvae and the eventual instability of the hive."
In 2012, researchers in Italy published findings that the pneumatic drilling machines that plant corn seeds coated with clothianidin and imidacloprid release large amounts of the pesticide into the air, causing significant mortality in foraging honey bees. The authors state, "Experimental results show that the environmental release of particles containing neonicotinoids can produce high exposure levels for bees, with lethal effects compatible with colony losses phenomena observed by beekeepers."
Dave Goulson from the University of Stirling was able to show that trivial effects due to imidacloprid in lab and greenhouse experiments can translate into large effects in the field. The research found that bees consuming the pesticide suffered an 85% loss in the number of queens their nests produced, and a doubling of the number of bees who failed to return from food foraging trips.
Researchers from Harvard School of Public Health write that new research provides "convincing evidence" of the link between imidacloprid and the phenomenon known as Colony Collapse Disorder. Lead author of the study, Chensheng (Alex) Lu, stated that experiments showed a dose of 20 parts per billion of imidacloprid (less than the concentrations bees would encounter while foraging in sprayed crops), was enough to lead to Colony Collapse Disorder in 94% of colonies within 23 weeks. The hives were nearly empty and the researchers did not find signs of the Nosema virus or Varroa mites. The researchers proposed two possible sources of bees' exposure to imidacloprid. The first is through the nectar of plants sprayed with the pesticide itself, which is predicted by researchers at the University of Stirling, U.K., to have widespread impacts as imidacloprid is registered for use on over 140 crops in at least 120 countries. The second is through the high-fructose corn-syrup that most bee-keepers in the United States use to feed their bees. Since application of imidacloprid to corn in the United States began in 2005 cases of Colony Collapse Disorder have grown significantly: from losses of 17% to 20% throughout the 1990s to somewhere between 30% and 90% of colonies in the United States since 2006.
In May 2012, researchers at the University of San Diego released a study that showed that honey bees treated with a small dose of imidacloprid, comparable to what they would receive in nectar and formerly considered a safe amount, became "picky eaters," refusing nectars of lower sweetness and preferring to feed only on sweeter nectar. It was also found that bees exposed to imidacloprid performed the "waggle dance," the movements that bees use to inform hive mates of the location of foraging plants, at a lesser rate.
Also in 2012, USDA researcher Jeff Pettis published the results of his study, which showed that bees treated with sub-lethal or low levels of imidacloprid had higher rates of infection with the pathogen Nosema than untreated bees. His research confirmed that done by Alaux (2010) and Vidau (2011), who found that interactions between Nosema and neonicotinoids weakened bees and led to increased mortality.
Prompted by several peer reviewed independent studies showing that neonicotinoids, including imidacloprid, had previously undetected routes of exposure affecting bees including through dust, pollen, and nectar; that sub-nanogram toxicity resulted in failure to return to the hive without immediate lethality, the primary symptom of colony collapse disorder; and showing environmental persistence in agricultural irrigation channels and soil, the European Food Safety Authority performed a formal peer review study which stated in January 2013 that neonicotinoids pose an unacceptably high risk to bees, and that the industry-sponsored science upon which regulatory agencies' claims of safety have relied on may be flawed and contain several data gaps not previously considered. Their review concluded, "A high acute risk to honey bees was identified from exposure via dust drift for the seed treatment uses in maize, oilseed rape and cereals. A high acute risk was also identified from exposure via residues in nectar and/or pollen." David Goulson, an author of one of the Science studies which prompted the EESA peer review, has suggested that industry science pertaining to neonicotinoids may have been deliberately deceptive, and the UK Parliament has asked manufacturer Bayer Cropscience to explain discrepancies in evidence they have submitted to an investigation.
In October 2009, a documentary film, Vanishing of the Bees, was released in theatres in the UK. The film interviewed a number of experts in connection with CCD and suggested a link does exist between neonicotinoid pesticides and CCD. However, the experts interviewed conceded no firm scientific data yet exist. Industry-sponsored studies appear to be inconsistent with those produced by independent scientists. Until 2009 regulatory agencies still did not have conclusive data to determine the effects of imidacloprid on bee colonies.
In February 2010, the documentary film Nicotine Bees was released. This film analyzes the possible factors contributing to the large bee die-offs worldwide and concludes that the large use of neonicotinoids is the most probable cause of the recent bee die-offs.
- Yamamoto, I.; Casida, J.E. (1999). Nicotinoid Insecticides and the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. Springer. ISBN 443170213X.
- Ishaaya, I. (2001). Biochemical Sites of Insecticide Action and Resistance. Springer. ISBN 3540676252.
- "Pesticide Information Profiles: Imidacloprid". Extension Toxicology Network. Retrieved April 7, 2012.
- Tomizawa, Motohiro (2004). "Neonicotinoids and Derivatives: Effects in Mammalian Cells and Mice". Journal of Pesticide Science 29 (3): 177–183. doi:10.1584/jpestics.29.177. ISSN 1348-589X.
- Fossen, Matthew (2006). "Environmental Fate of Imidacloprid" (PDF). California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- Johnson, Renée (7 January 2010). "Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder". Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- Decourtye, Axel; Devillers, James (2010). "Ecotoxicity of Neonicotinoid Insecticides to Bees". In Thany, Steeve Hervé. Insect Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology) 683. pp. 85–95. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6445-8_8. ISBN 978-1-4419-6444-1.
- European Food Safety Authority (16 January 2013) "Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance clothianidin" EFSA Journal 11(1):3066.
- Damian Carrington (16 January 2013) "Insecticide 'unacceptable' danger to bees, report finds" The Guardian
- EU to Restrict 'Bee-Harming' Pesticides April 29, 2013 Wall Street Journal
- Pesticide Action Network. Imidacloprid
- Comité Scientifique et Technique (18 September 2003). "Imidaclopride utilisé en enrobage de semences (Gaucho) et troubles des abeilles: Rapport final" [Imidacloprid used in coating seeds (Gaucho) and disorders of bees: Final report] (PDF) (in French). Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- "USDA Colony Collapse Disorder Progress Report" (PDF). USDA Agriculture Research Service. June 2010. Retrieved April 7, 2012.
- Carrington, Damian (12 December 2012). "Insecticide regulators ignoring risk to bees, say MPs". The Guardian (London).
- Suchail, Séverine; Guez, David; Belzunces, Luc P. (November 2011). "Discrepancy between acute and chronic toxicity induced by imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20 (11): 2482–2486. doi:10.1002/etc.5620201113. PMID 11699773. Check date values in:
|year= / |date= mismatch(help)
- Suchail, Séverine; Guez, David; Belzunces, Luc P. (July 2000). "Characteristics of imidacloprid toxicity in two Apis mellifera subspecies". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19: 1901–1905. doi:10.1002/etc.5620190726.
- Biondi, Antonio; Mommaerts Veerle; Smagghe Guy; Vinuela Elisa; Zappalà Lucia; Desneux Nicolas (2012). "The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods". Pest Management Science 68: 1523–1536. doi:10.1002/ps.3396.
- Federoff, N.E.; Vaughan, Allen; Barrett, M.R. (13 November 2008). "Environmental Fate and Effects Division Problem Formulation for the Registration Review of Imidacloprid". US EPA. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- Desneux, Nicolas; Decourtye Axel; Delpuech Jean-Marie (2007). "The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods". Annual Review of Entomology 52: 81–106. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440.
- Armengaud, C.; Lambin, M.; Gauthier, M. (2002), "Effects of imidacloprid on the neural processes of memory", in Devillers, J; Pham-Delegue, M.H., Honey bees: estimating the environmental impact of chemicals, New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 85–100, ISBN 9780415275187
- Decourtye, A; Lacassie, E; Pham-Delegue, M-H (2003). "Learning performances of honeybees (Apis mellifera L) are differentially affected by imidacloprid according to the season". Pest Manage Sci 59: 269–278. doi:10.1002/ps.631.
- Decourtye, A.; Armengaud, C.; Devillers, R.M.; Cluzeau, S. (2004). "Imidacloprid impairs memory and brain metabolism in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L)". Pesticide Biochem Phys. 78: 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2003.10.001.
- Guez, D.; Suchail, S.; Gauthier, M.; Maleszka, R.; Belzunces, L. (2001). "Contrasting effects of imidacloprid on habituation in 7- and 8-day old honeybees (Apis mellifera)". Neurobiol Learning Memory 76: 183–191. doi:10.1006/nlme.2000.3995.
- Pham-Delegue, M.H.; Cluzeau, S. (1999), "Effets des produits phytosanitaires sur l’abeille; incidence du traitement des semences de tournesol par Gaucho sur les disparitions de butineuses", Rapport final de synthese au Ministere de l’Agriculture et de la Peche
- Lambin, M.; Armengaud, C.; Ramond, S.; Gauthier, M. (2001). "Imidacloprid-induced facilitation of the proboscis extension reflex habituation in the honeybee". Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 48: 129–134. doi:10.1002/arch.1065.
- Williamson, S.M.; Wright, G.A (2013). "Exposure to multiple cholinergic pesticides impairs olfactory learning and memory in honeybees" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology 216 (10): 1799–1807. doi:10.1242/jeb.083931. ISSN 0022-0949. PMC 3641805. PMID 23393272.
- Medrzycki, P.; Montanari, R.; Bortolotti, L.; Sabatini, A. G.; Maini, S.; Porrini, C. (2003). "Effects of imidacloprid administered in sub-lethal doses on honey bee behaviour. Laboratory tests" (PDF). Bulletin of Insectology 56 (1): 59–62. ISSN 1721-8861.
- Yang, E.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.L.; Chang, L.H (2008). "Abnormal foraging behavior induced by sublethal dosage of imidacloprid in the honeybee (Hymenoptera: Apidae)". J. Econ Entomology 101 (6): 1743–1748. doi:10.1603/0022-0493-101.6.1743.
- Bortolotti, L.; Montanari R.; Marcelino J.; Medrzycki P.; Maini S.; Porrini C. (2003). "Effects of sub-lethal imidacloprid doses on the homing rate and foraging activity of honey bees" (PDF). Bulletin of Insectology 56 (1): 63–67. ISSN 1721-8861.
- Lu, Chensheng; Warchol, K. M.; Callahan, R. A. (2012). "In situ replication of honey bee colony collapse disorder (13 March 2012 corrected proof)" (PDF). Bulletin of Insectology 65 (1). ISSN 1721-8861. Retrieved 7 April 2012.
- Moncharmont, F.D.; Decourtye, A.; Hantier, C.H.; Pons, O.; Pham-Delegue, M. (2003). "Statistical analysis of honeybee survival after chronic exposure to insecticides". Environ Toxicol Chem 22 (12): 3088–94. doi:10.1897/02-578.
- Decourtye, A.; Metayer, M., Pottiau, H., Tisseur, M., Odoux, J.F., Pham-Delegue, M.H. (1999), "Impairment of olfactory learning performances in the honeybee after long-term ingestion of imidacloprid", Hazards of Pesticides to Bees, Paris: INRA
- Mommaerts, V.; Reynders, S.; Boulet, J.; Besard, L.; Sterk, G.; Smagghe, G. (2009). "Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior". Ecotoxicology 19: 207–215. doi:10.1007/s10646-009-0406-2.
- Pettis, Jeffery S.; vanEngelsdorp, Dennis; Johnson, Josephine; Dively, Galen (2012). "Pesticide exposure in honey bees results in increased levels of the gut pathogen Nosema". Naturwissenschaften 99 (2): 153–158. doi:10.1007/s00114-011-0881-1. ISSN 0028-1042. PMC 3264871. PMID 22246149.
- Alaux, Cédric; Brunet, Jean-Luc; Dussaubat, Claudia; Mondet, Fanny; Tchamitchan, Sylvie; Cousin, Marianne; Brillard, Julien; Baldy, Aurelie; Belzunces, Luc P.; Le Conte, Yves (2010). "Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera)". Environmental Microbiology 12 (3): 774–782. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x. ISSN 1462-2912. PMC 2847190. PMID 20050872.
- Maus, C.; Curé, G.; Schmuck, R. (2003). "Safety of imidacloprid seed dressings to honey bees: a comprehensive overview and compilation of the current state of knowledge" (PDF). Bulletin of Insectology 56 (1): 51–57. ISSN 1721-8861.
- French honey makers in a buzz over pesticides
- Bonmatin, J.M.; Marchand, P.A.; Charvet, R.; Moineau, I.; Bengsch, E.R.; Colin, M.A. (2005). "Quantification of imidacloprid uptake in maize crops". J. Agric. Food Chem 53 (13): 5336–5341. doi:10.1021/jf0479362. PMID 15969515.
- Laurent, F.M.; Rathahao, E. (2003). "Distribution of 14C-imidacloprid in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) following seed treatment". J Agric Food Chem 51 (27): 8005–10. doi:10.1021/jf034310n.
- http://www.millersriver.net/pollen/talks/Microsoft%20PowerPoint%20-%20Kim%20Stoner%20pdf%20for%20posting.pdf[dead link]
- [European Draft Assessment Report: Imidacloprid. Annex B, B.7. February 2006]
- Cvetkovic, Predrag. "Interview with Henry Clement the president of National Union of French Beekeeping (UNAF)". Retrieved 27 March 2014.
- "Emergency Pesticide Ban for Saving the Honeybee" Institute of Science in Society, 2008
- CBG Germany: Charge against Bayer´s Board of Management August 25, 2008
- Memorandum US EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention; November 2, 2010
- Avaaz.org petition
- Tapparo, A.; Marton, D.; Giorio, C.; Zanella, A.; Soldà, L.; Marzaro, M.; Vivan, L.; Girolami, V. (2012). "Assessment of the Environmental Exposure of Honeybees to Particulate Matter Containing Neonicotinoid Insecticides Coming from Corn Coated Seeds". Environmental Science & Technology 46 (5): 2592–2599. doi:10.1021/es2035152. PMID 22292570.
- Carrington, Damian (March 29, 2012). "Pesticides linked to honeybee decline". London: The Guardian. Retrieved April 7, 2012.
- Whitehorn, P. R.; O'Connor, S.; Wackers, F. L.; Goulson, D. (2012). "Neonicotinoid Pesticide Reduces Bumble Bee Colony Growth and Queen Production". Science 336 (6079): 351–2. doi:10.1126/science.1215025. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 22461500.
- Datz, Todd (5 April 2012). "Press Release: Use of Common Pesticide Linked to Bee Colony Collapse". Harvard School of Public Health. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- Harmon, Katherine. "Common Pesticide Implicated Bee Colony Collapse Disorder". Scientific American blog. Retrieved 15 April 2012.
- Commonly Used Pesticide Turns Honey Bees into ‘Picky Eaters’
- Didier, Elizabeth; Vidau, Cyril; Diogon, Marie; Aufauvre, Julie; Fontbonne, Régis; Viguès, Bernard; Brunet, Jean-Luc; Texier, Catherine; Biron, David G.; Blot, Nicolas; El Alaoui, Hicham; Belzunces, Luc P.; Delbac, Frédéric (2011). "Exposure to Sublethal Doses of Fipronil and Thiacloprid Highly Increases Mortality of Honeybees Previously Infected by Nosema ceranae". PLoS ONE 6 (6): e21550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021550. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3125288. PMID 21738706.
- European Food, Safety Authority (2012). "Assessment of the scientific information from the Italian project 'APENET' investigating effects on honeybees of coated maize seeds with some neonicotinoids and fipronil" (PDF). EFSA Journal 10 (6): 2792.
- Official website of the 2009 documentary Vanishing of the Bees
- Nicotine Bees website
- webpage from Bayer CropScience page on Imidacloprid and Bee safety noting independent trials show product as safe for bees
- link to example of Bayer product containing Imidiacloprid noting product is a high risk to bees
- juridical case lost by Bayer, requalified defaming toward Maurice Mary
- demonstration against Imidacloprid and links on beekeeping.com
- Honey bees in US facing extinction, The Telegraph, 14 March 2007
- Various links on scientific reports and news articles (French & English) on the website of the Union Nationale de l'Apiculture Française (UNAF) union
- British Bee Keepers Association position on Bayer's pesticides
- Official documentary website of the 2009 documentary film Vanishing of the Bees
- Bayer-kills-bees.com advocacy site updated about five times per month
- How to Reduce Bee Poisoning from Pesticides PNW 591, (Pacific Northwest Extension)