Internet Relay Chat flood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Flooding or scrolling on an IRC network is a method of disconnecting users from an IRC server (a form of Denial of Service), exhausting bandwidth which causes network latency ('lag'), or just annoying users. Floods can either be done by scripts (written for a given client) or by external programs.

It is possible to flood a client off the network simply by sending them data faster than they can receive it and thus cause a quit with the "max sendq exceeded" message, but this is generally only feasible if the user's connection is already slow/lagging and/or the attacker has a very large number of connections to the IRC network. Therefore, more common flooding techniques are based on the fact that the maximum number of messages that can be sent in a specified interval is controlled on the IRC server. Once this value is exceeded messages are stored in a buffer and delayed. If the buffer is filled the client is disconnected with an "Excess Flood" quit message. By sending messages that request an automated reply some IRC clients can be forced to flood themselves off.

Types of floods[edit]

A post flood on #wikipedia-en, using the common Internet term "OMG".
Crapflood
This is the simplest type of IRC flooding. It involves posting large amounts of posts or one very long post with repetitive text. It can also involve text with no meaning or no pertinence to the current discussion.[1] This type of flood can be achieved, for example, by copying and pasting one short word repeatedly.
CTCP flood 
Since CTCP is implemented in almost every client,[citation needed] most users respond to CTCP requests. By sending too many requests, after a couple of answers they get disconnected from the IRC server. The most widely used type is CTCP PING, although most clients also implement other CTCP replies.
DCC flood 
Initiating many DCC requests simultaneously. Theoretically it can also be used to disconnect users, because the target client sends information back about what port is intended to be used during the DCC session.
ICMP flood 
Typically referred to as a ping flood. This attack overloads the victim's internet connection with an amount of ICMP data exceeding the connection's capacity, potentially causing a disconnection from the IRC network. For the duration of the attack, the user's internet connection remains hindered. Technically speaking, this is not an IRC flood, as the attack itself doesn't traverse the IRC network at all, but operates entirely independent of anything but the raw internet connection and its IP protocol (of which ICMP is a subset). Even so, the actual IP address to flood (the address of the victim's connection) is frequently obtained by looking at the victim's user information (e.g. through the /whois or /dns command) on the IRC network.
Example of a message flood using over 50 clones.
Message flood 
Sending massive amounts of private messages to the victim, mainly from different connections called clones (see below). Since some clients separate the private conversations into another window, each new message could open a new window for every new user a message is received from. This is exploitable by sending messages from multiple names, causing the target client to open many new windows and potentially swamping the user with boxes. Sometimes the easiest way to close all the windows is to restart the IRC client, although scripts (client extensions) exist to 'validate' unknown nicknames before receiving messages from them.
Notice flood 
Similar to the message, but uses the "notice" command.
Invite flood 
Sending disruptive amounts of invites to a certain channel.
Nick flood 
Changing the nick as fast as possible, thus disrupting conversation in the channel.
Connect flood 
Connecting and disconnecting from a channel as fast as possible, therefore spamming the channel with dis/connect messages also called q/j flooding.

Clones[edit]

Abusers do not typically flood from their own nicknames, because of the following reasons:

  • They can easily be K-lined by administrators ('IRCops,' 'ServerOPs' or 'SOPs'),
  • Channel bans by operators ('ChanOPs' or 'OPs'),
  • From one user the flood is often not effective (the limits apply to the attacker as well).

Instead clones are used, which are script or program controlled clients, primary designed to abuse others. When this method is used, it becomes easier to attack a user using many clones at the same time. Generally, the more clones an attacker has, the greater the chance of an attack succeeding. However the maximum connections from any one ip address are generally limited by the IRC network (either at the IRCD level or the services level).

One common way to increase the number of clones is by using open proxies. Usually, these proxies are SOCKS or Squid-based, which support IRC connections by default. If one has a list of open proxies, he can use them to connect his clones through them to various IRC servers. Alternatively, compromised systems can be used to make the connections.

To prevent this, nowadays some IRC servers[2] are configured to check common proxy ports of the client at the very beginning of the connection. If a successful proxy request can be done, it immediately drops the user (or clone). Many other IRC networks[3][4][5][6][7][8] use a separate proxy scanner like BOPM[9] that scans users as they join the network and kills or glines any users it detects an open proxy on. However, this offers no protection against compromised systems or proxies on nonstandard ports (a full 65535 port scan isn't prototypically feasible both for performance reasons and because it risks setting off Intrusion Detection Systems), so most networks that do port scans also check if the connecting client is listed in specific DNSBLs like the TOR DNSBL.[10]

Protection[edit]

Almost every IRC client offers some kind of flood protection. These protections are based on the built-in "ignore" feature, which means that a given incoming message, CTCP, invitation, etc. will be blocked if the sender's hostmask matches any of the masks are defined in the ignore list. This is useful as few IRC networks implement the 'silence' command to reject messages by the server. In other words, every message will be posted to the correspondent user, whether it is a normal message or its content is intentionally malicious.

Many clients also limit the number of replies that can be sent in response to any incoming traffic from the network thus avoiding hitting the excess flood limit.

Flood protection in mIRC[edit]

There's also flood protection in the popular Windows-based client program, mIRC, in the Options menu. Users can set up some important values about how many incoming bytes are considered to be flooding, maximum incoming lines per user and ignorance time. Note that these settings are not enabled by default.

Despite these possibilities, there are much more sophisticated ways to eliminate flooding using mIRC scripts. These include additional features, such as CTCP cloaking, better message flood control, more adjustable flood triggers, and many others.

Firewalls and floods[edit]

Many users believe that installing a firewall will protect them against these attacks. But firewalls typically don't deal with this kind of application layer denial-of-service attack and no known application layer firewalls provide such protection for IRC at this time.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ An example of this would be someone posting the entire contents of a book or poem when the book or poem in question is unrelated to discussion.
  2. ^ http://www.undernet.org/proxyscan.php
  3. ^ http://proxyscan.freenode.net/
  4. ^ http://irc.netsplit.de/networks/EsperNet/
  5. ^ http://www.oftc.net/oftc/FAQ/IRC_Related_Questions#Why_am_I_port-scanned_on_connect.3F
  6. ^ http://wiki.blitzed.org/Bans%2C_kills_and_K:_lines#K:_lined_by_Blitzed_OPM_.28BOPM.29
  7. ^ http://abuse.rizon.net/
  8. ^ chat.stratics.com/irc-proxyscan.html
  9. ^ Do a "/whois BOPM" on OFTC or Blitzed, for example.
  10. ^ http://www.sectoor.de/tor.php

References[edit]

External links[edit]