Sensus fidei (sense of the faith), also called sensus fidelium (sense of the faithful) when exercised by the body of the faithful as a whole, is "the supernatural appreciation of faith on the part of the whole people, when, from the bishops to the last of the faithful, they manifest a universal consent in matters of faith and morals". Quoting the document Lumen gentium of the Second Vatican Council, the Catechism of the Catholic Church adds: "By this appreciation of the faith, aroused and sustained by the Spirit of truth, the People of God, guided by the sacred teaching authority (Magisterium),... receives... the faith, once for all delivered to the saints... the People unfailingly adheres to this faith, penetrates it more deeply with right judgment, and applies it more fully in daily life."
The terms sensus fidei fidelium (sense of the faith on the part of the faithful) and sensus fidei fidelis (sense of the faith on the part of an individual member of the faithful) are also used.
Officially excluded understandings
Views of laity alone
The Second Vatican Council made it clear that sensus fidelium (sense of the faithful) does not mean sensus laicorum (sense of the lay people), as if it were a charism granted to the laity in isolation from the Catholic Church hierarchy, and as if the clergy were not included among "the faithful". It stated:
The entire body of the faithful, anointed as they are by the Holy One, cannot err in matters of belief. They manifest this special property by means of the whole people's supernatural discernment in matters of faith when "from the Bishops down to the last of the lay faithful" they show universal agreement in matters of faith and morals. That discernment in matters of faith is aroused and sustained by the Spirit of truth. It is exercised under the guidance of the sacred teaching authority, in faithful and respectful obedience to which the people of God accepts that which is not just the word of men but truly the word of God.
It declared that Christ fulfils his prophetic office "not only through the hierarchy who teach in His name and with His authority, but also through the laity whom He made His witnesses and to whom He gave understanding of the faith [sensus fidei] and an attractiveness in speech so that the power of the Gospel might shine forth in their daily social and family life.
Independent of Church magisterium
In a speech to the International Theological Commission on 7 December 2012, Pope Benedict XVI distinguished between the authentic meaning of sensus fidei and a counterfeit understanding: "It is certainly not a kind of public ecclesial opinion, and invoking it in order to contest the teachings of the Magisterium would be unthinkable, since the sensus fidei cannot be authentically developed in believers, except to the extent in which they fully participate in the life of the Church, and this demands responsible adherence to the Magisterium, to the deposit of faith.
This distinction was expressed also by the Second Vatican Council in the passage quoted above, in which it states that the discernment of the faithful in matters of faith and morals "is exercised under the guidance of the sacred teaching authority, in faithful and respectful obedience to which the people of God accepts that which is not just the word of men but truly the word of God".
What may be a contrary view was expressed in an article by the editorial staff of the "progressive" National Catholic Reporter: "Blessed John Henry Newman said that there are three magisteria in the church: the bishops, the theologians and the people. On the issue of women's ordination, two of the three voices have been silenced, which is why the third voice must now make itself heard... Our message is that we believe the sensus fidelium is that the exclusion of women from the priesthood has no strong basis in Scripture or any other compelling rationale; therefore, women should be ordained. We have heard the faithful assent to this in countless conversations in parish halls, lecture halls and family gatherings. It has been studied and prayed over individually and in groups." A branch of the Cardinal Newman Society countered this view by quoting what the Pope coincidentally said only four days later, and by commenting: "One need not look very far in Catholic circles nowadays to find some mention of sensus fidelium which literally means 'sense of faith'. ... Recently, the term has been misused to argue for same-sex 'marriage', contraception and even women's ordination. It's a form of Magisterium by Gallup in which a person argues that most Catholics agree with them on an issue, so even though the Magisterium says otherwise, they hold the trump card because of sensus fidei." Cardinal Newman's actual view is that only the Ecclesia docens ("teaching Church", magisterium) discerns, discriminates, defines, promulgates, and enforces any portion of the tradition of the Apostles committed to the whole Church.
Cardinal Charles Journet wrote that the sensus fidei is "neither a teaching nor a magisterium, but only the felt conviction of a truth". Believers can mix with their faith data or feelings foreign to it and they therefore need, he said, "to be helped, directed, judged by the divinely assisted magisterium". The magisterium for its part "has the task of discerning and confirming what is pre-felt, indicated and anticipated by the sensus fidei".
Identified with prevailing opinion
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith ruled out the "sociological argumentation which holds that the opinion of a large number of Christians would be a direct and adequate expression of the "supernatural sense of the faith" (sensus fidei). It commented: "The believer can still have erroneous opinions since all his thoughts do not spring from faith. Not all the ideas which circulate among the People of God are compatible with the faith. This is all the more so given that people can be swayed by a public opinion influenced by modern communications media. Not without reason did the Second Vatican Council emphasize the indissoluble bond between the sensus fidei and the guidance of God's People by the magisterium of the Pastors. These two realities cannot be separated."
With regard to passing a judgement on the attitude reflected in the activities of the Inquisition, Pope John Paul II stated: "The theologians will be guided by a distinction in their critical reflection: the distinction between the authentic sensus fidei and the predominant mentality in a specific epoch that might have influenced their opinion. The sensus fidei must be asked to exercise the criteria of a level judgment of the life of the Church in the past."
Theologian Cardinal Georges Cottier wrote: "Obviously, the sensus fidei is not to be identified with the consensus of the majority, it is not defined on the basis of the statistics of polls. In the history of the Church it has happened that in certain contexts the sensus fidei has been manifested by isolated individuals, single saints, while general opinion hung on to doctrines not conforming to the apostolic faith."
Donal Dorr instead has commented critically on what he sees as the Church's failure to effectively listen to what he views as the sensus fidei, which he perhaps looks for in Third World countries, since he also speaks of actual Catholic social teaching as showing a western and ethnocentric leaning, There are opposing theologians, such as George Weigel, who believe that Catholic social doctrine is emerging as more liberal and attentive to this tendency in the community of the faithful.[relevant to this paragraph? ]
Concerned with Church governance
Confusing the sensus fidelium or sensus fidei with questions of governance departs from the teaching of the Council, which applies it instead to the teaching office of the Church.
The Second Vatican Council, quoted above, spoke of the sensus fidei as concerning the showing of "universal agreement in matter of faith and morals", a "discernment in matters of faith ... exercised under the guidance of the sacred teaching authority, in faithful and respectful obedience to which the people of God accepts that which is not just the word of men but truly the word of God."
Use by the magisterium
Consensus among the faithful is a powerful witness to the truth of a doctrine, but that consensus is not what makes the doctrine true. The consensus is a result, not a cause of the truth of the doctrine.
The sensus fidei, the universal consent, from the bishops to the last of the faithful, in a matter of faith, preceded the definition of the Marian dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary: Pope Benedict XVI said: "Faith both in the Immaculate Conception and in the bodily Assumption of the Virgin was already present in the People of God, while theology had not yet found the key to interpreting it in the totality of the doctrine of the faith. The People of God therefore precede theologians and this is all thanks to that supernatural sensus fidei, namely, that capacity infused by the Holy Spirit that qualifies us to embrace the reality of the faith with humility of heart and mind. In this sense, the People of God is the 'teacher that goes first' and must then be more deeply examined and intellectually accepted by theology." In each case, the dogma was defined "not so much because of proofs in scripture or ancient tradition, but due to a profound sensus fidelium and the Magisterium".[dead link] Each of the two popes concerned consulted the bishops of the world about the faith of the Catholic community before proceeding to define the dogma.
- CCC, 92.
- CCC, 93.
- Rush, Ormond (2009). The Eyes of Faith. The Sense of the Faithful and the Church's Reception of Revelation. Washington, D.C.: CUA Press. p. 66. ISBN 0-813-21571-4; ISBN 978-0-81321571-6.
- Rush, Ormond (2004). Still Interpreting Vatican II. Some Hermeneutical Principles. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press. p. 108. ISBN 0-809-14285-6; ISBN 978-0-80914285-9.
- Lumen gentium, 12 quoted also in CCC, 92-93.
- Lumen gentium, 35.
- Pope Benedict XVI, Address to the International Theological Commission, 7 December 2012.
- NCR Editorial staff (3 December 2012). "Editorial: Ordination of women would correct an injustice". National Catholic Reporter (Kansas City, Missouri). Retrieved 13 July 2013.
- Archbold, Matthew (11 December 2012). "Pope Clarifies The Oft-Cited Sensus Fidei". Manassas, Virginia: The Cardinal Newman Society. Retrieved 13 July 2013.
- Newman, John Henry (1859). The Rambler, Volumes 1-2. London: Central Publishing Office. p. 205. "The tradition of the Apostles, committed to the whole Church in its various constituents and functions per modum unius, manifests itself variously at various times: sometimes by the mouth of the episcopacy, sometimes by the doctors, sometimes by the people, sometimes by liturgies, rites, ceremonies, and customs, by events, disputes, movements, and all those other phenomena which are comprised under the name of history. It follows that none of these channels of tradition may be treated with disrespect; granting at the same time fully, that the gift of discerning, discriminating, defining, promulgating, and enforcing any portion of that tradition resides solely in the Ecclesia docens." See also: Coulson, John, ed. (1962). On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 63. ISBN 0934134510; ISBN 9780934134514.
- Cottier, Georges (August-September 2010). "Reflections on the Life and Mystery of the Church". Rome: 30 Days. Retrieved 14 July 2013.
- Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Instruction "Donum veritatis" (24 May 1990), 35.
- Pope John Paul II, Letter on the occasion of the presentation of the volume "L'Inquisizione" (15 June 2004).
- Dorr, Donal (1992). Option for the Poor. A Hundred Years of Vatican Social Teaching (2nd ed.). Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books. ISBN 0883448270; ISBN 9780883448274. Excerpt: "here is a real danger that the promotion of Catholic social teaching (as presently articulated) may contribute to the imposition of Western values on the peoples of other cultures.""The Roman authorities must find more effective ways of listening to the sensus fidei."
- Grasso, Kenneth L.; Bradley, Gerard V.; Hunt, Robewrt P., eds. (1995). Catholicism, Liberalism, and Communitarianism. The Catholic Intellectual Tradition and the Moral Foundations of Democracy. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 257-8. ISBN 0847679950; ISBN 9780847679959.
- Rush, Ormond (2009). P. 60.
- Penrise, James (18 November 2010). "'American Catholic Council', Sensus Fidelium and the Voice of the Truly Faithful". Grand Rapids, Michigan: Catholic Online. Retrieved 14 July 2013. "Sensus fidelium does not mean that universal consent of the faithful is necessary for a doctrine to be true, or that doctrine becomes true by virtue of such consensus. It means that universal consent is possible because the doctrine is true in the first place. Truth emanates from God and comes to the faithful-not the other way around. When the entire body of the faithful recognizes the truth through "supernatural discernment" - not by human reason alone - sensus fidelium becomes the prophetic witness spoken of in Lumen Gentium. This is what is meant by 'The holy people of God shares also in Christ's prophetic office'. When the entire body of the faithful agrees with the truth, it is a powerful and prophetic witness to the rest of the world. When 'the faithful' is divided, it is a sad and pathetic witness of an institution showing only its human limitations and rejecting its divine identity."
- Pope Benedict XVI, General Audience, 7 July 2010.
- "150th Anniversary of the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception" in Fides Press Agency.
- Henn, William (2006) . "Interpreting Marian Doctrine (pp. 413-437)". Gregorianum, Volume 70, Issue 3 87 (4). Rome: Gregorian Publishing Group. p. 431. ISSN 0017-4114.
- Finucane, Daniel J. (1996). Sensus Fidelium. The Use of a Concept in the Post-Vatican II Era. San Francisco/London: International Scholars Publishing. ISBN 1573090816; ISBN 9781573090810.
- Rush, Ormond (June 2001). "Sensus Fidei: Faith 'Making Sense' of Revelation". Theological Studies (Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University) 62 (2): 231–261. ISSN 0040-5639. Retrieved 14 July 2013.