System of Rice Intensification
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is a method of increasing the yield of rice produced in farming. It was developed in 1983 by the French Jesuit Father Henri de Laulanie in Madagascar. However full testing of the system did not occur until some years later. The productivity of SRI is under debate between supporters and critics of the system.
Contents |
[edit] History and main ideas of SRI
Assembly of the practices that culminated in SRI began in the 1960s based on Fr. de Laulanie's observation of 'positive-deviant' farmer practices, starting with planting single seedlings instead of multiple seedlings in a clump, and not keeping irrigated paddy fields flooded during the rice plants' vegetative growth stage. Planting with wider spacing in a square pattern, rather than randomly or in rows, followed, as did controlling weed growth by use of a soil-aerating push-weeder (rotating hoe).[citation needed]
In 1983, the beneficial effect of transplanting very young seedlings, less than 15 days old, was discovered serendipitously. Subsequently, when fertilizer prices increased, compost made from any decomposed biomass turned out to give even better results than chemical fertilizer.[citation needed] SRI concepts and practices continue to evolve as they are being adapted to rain-fed (unirrigated) conditions and with transplanting being superseded by direct-seeding sometimes.
The synthesis of SRI has proceeded empirically, but the central principles for getting best results are:
- rice field soils should be kept moist rather than continuously saturated, minimizing anaerobic conditions, as this improves root growth and supports the growth and diversity of aerobic soil organisms;
- rice plants should be planted singly and spaced optimally widely to permit more growth of roots and canopy and to keep all leaves photosynthetically active; and
- rice seedlings should be transplanted when young, less than 15 days old with just two leaves, quickly, shallow and carefully, to avoid trauma to roots and to minimize transplant shock.
These changes from conventional practice when managing plants, soil, water and nutrients induce more productive phenotypes from any rice genotype, although some varieties respond better than others to SRI methods. Increased yield is achieved with 80-90% reductions in seed requirements (lower plant population) and 25-50% less irrigation water. Chemical fertilizer and agrochemical crop protection can be used, but best results can be attained without use of purchased inputs.[citation needed]
[edit] Rotary weeder
Weed growth will be higher in these fields due to the absence of standing water. But since the rice plants are planted with wider spaces between rows, a rotary weeder can be drawn in between the rows of plants to remove the weeds and also aerate the soil. On the 10 day after planting weeds may not be prominent, but its better to weed so that the weeds do not get a chance to assimilate the nutrients. Modified weeders such as the conoweeder are available.[citation needed] In Kerala, India the technique has been adopted by some people owing to the pressure from the Department of Agriculture and Mithraniketan ( an NGO Krishi Vignan Kendra located at Trivandrum). Failure are attributed to poor water management, non use of rotary weeder and use of older seedlings.[citation needed]
[edit] Spread of SRI
The spread of SRI from Madagascar to around the globe has been credited to Norman Uphoff, director of the International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York from 1990 to 2005. In 1993, Uphoff met officials from Association Tefy Saina, the non-governmental organisation set up in Madagascar in 1990 by de Laulanie to promote SRI. After seeing the success of SRI for three years when Malagasy farmers previously averaging 2 tons/hectare averaged 8 tons/hectare with SRI, Uphoff became persuaded of the merits of the system, and in 1997 started to promote SRI in Asia. As of 2007, the beneficial effects of SRI methods had been documented in 28 countries, most recently in Bhutan, Iraq, Iran and Zambia. Governments in the largest rice-producing countries (China, India and Indonesia) are now supporting SRI extension. In India, SRI concepts and practices have been extrapolated successfully to other crops such as sugar cane, finger millet and wheat.[citation needed]. To help farmers in efficient and easy weeding, KGVK is now marketing a Single Row Weeder, This innovative Weeder, developed by the Engineers of Usha Martin’s Machinery Division, in close collaboration with KGVK Agriculture professionals and Grassroots Farmers. The new Weeder is robust and well engineered with features, which make the work of Farmers relatively much easier, requiring less effort.
[edit] Cases of Success
Several cases of success are reported in Kerala, India. The program has proven successful in Nellanad Gramapanchayat in Thiruvananthapuram. Agricultural Officers including Sreekala, Sreekumari, and Geethakumari have several cases of success.[citation needed] SRI in the Mountainous region of India in the state of Uttarakhand and HimachalPradesh is being spred by Peoples' Science Institute. Now SRI have been adopted by the Government of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh,More than 20,000 farmers are practicing SRI in these states. In the Drought affected area of India mainly at Bundelkhand region PSI is up-scaling the SRI, Mainly in Four district Damoh, Panna, Chitrakoot and Banda. Great success Have been achieved in Damoh and Panna district of Bundelkhand region. In Kharif season of 2011,In the Tendukhera block of Damoh District, 1300 farmers practiced SRI and the average increase in the income per farmer comes to Rs 18,000. Maximum yield that have been achieved by SRI in the Damoh District is 17 tonne per hectare. average 77% increase in paddy yield have been observed in Panna and chitrakoot district area as compare to traditional method. In Banda District only 47 % increase have been achieved.[1]
[edit] Criticism
There are criticisms of SRI. While supporters of SRI report many benefits in addition to yield increase—resistance to pests and diseases, resistance to abiotic stresses like drought and storm damage, more output of polished rice (in kg) when SRI paddy (unmilled rice) is processed (bushels), less chemical pollution of soil and water resources—critics have focused on yield suggesting that claims of increase are due to "poor record keeping and unscientific thinking". Some critics have suggested that SRI success is unique to soil conditions in Madagascar, a point that is disputed by supporters.[2]
Critics have objected that there is a lack of details on the methodology used in trials and a lack of publications in the peer-reviewed literature. This latter deficiency is now being remedied by such publications, but systematic trials that will satisfy scientific critics remain to be done. A global field trial is planned for 2009–2011, to be conducted by researchers from Cornell University, Wageningen University, and the International Rice Research Institute [3]
Additionally, the reliance on weeding/tilling machinery may limit the system's applicability.
A special issue on SRI of one scientific journal (Paddy and Water Environment, Norman Uphoff and Amir Kassam (eds.) Vol. 9 No. 1, March 2011, Springer) collected recent scientific findings on SRI, and settles many of the criticisms that have earlier been raised against the method. Articles in the journal covered a wide range of precipitation, labor/capital availability and other conditions and clarified the agronomic and scientific basis for the "SRI effect" -- the high-tiller, high-grain count that is typical of successful SRI trials.
Below is a picture gallery of SRI farming in Chattisgarh, India:
[edit] References
- ^ Pavitra Singh, research Scientist,Peoples' Science Institute, Dehradoon, +91-9410706109
- ^ Christopher Surridge. Rice cultivation: Feast or famine? Nature 428, 360–361 (25 March 2004). doi:10.1038/428360a
- ^ Norman T. Uphoff, "Food Revolution That Starts With Rice", The New York Times, 17/6/2008, [1]