Talk:Angeles City

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angeles City article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

2005-2006
26 December 2006 - 4 January 2007
28 December 2007 - 25 April 2007
25 April 2007 - 22 May 2007

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mount Pinatubo#Evacuations|evacuated]] The anchor (#Evacuations) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angeles, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.protectionproject.org/philippines.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Angeles City, Philippines

The title should be change to: Angeles City, Philippines. angeles is an old name by today's standard, thus should be name as: Angeles City, Philippines. i used to live there many years ago, before migrating into the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.83.149.202 (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't call our cities X City unless we have to in order to differentiate from a namesake province or region like Quezon City and Quezon. Angeles will always be Angeles just as Apalit will always be Apalit not Apalit Municipality.--RioHondo (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Angeles, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Angeles, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Angeles, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004221432/http://www.neda.gov.ph/devpulse/pdf_files/Devpulse%20factsheet%20-%20Aug%2030%20issue.pdf to http://www.neda.gov.ph/devpulse/pdf_files/Devpulse%20factsheet%20-%20Aug%2030%20issue.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724005348/http://philippinestravelguide.net/visit/angeles/ to http://philippinestravelguide.net/visit/angeles/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707143500/http://my.angelescityportal.com/m/articles/view/Angeles-City-History-Pt-2-American-Period to http://my.angelescityportal.com/m/articles/view/Angeles-City-History-Pt-2-American-Period
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.visitclark.com/pdf/clark_monitor/2005/Clark-Monitor-Nov%26Dec05-Issue.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2006/10/04/news/official.told.to.push.for.subic.clark.junction.in.angeles.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asminternational.org/Template.cfm?Section=NewsReleases1&template=%2FPressRelease%2FPressReleaseDisplay.cfm&PressReleaseID=1112&News=1
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.yehey.com/sports/full_article.aspx?id=181294&categ=12
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060428112037/http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=thingstodo&province=12 to http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=thingstodo&province=12
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0%2C8599%2C106430%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk//eceRedirect?articleId=44952&pubId=55
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070430013723/http://qc.indymedia.org/news/2005/03/2736.php to http://qc.indymedia.org/news/2005/03/2736.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929102837/http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/San/public/%7B7B62844A-267E-4E9A-82F9-224DC2FDA3E8%7D/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/html/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1_39.htm to http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/San/public/%7B7B62844A-267E-4E9A-82F9-224DC2FDA3E8%7D/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/html/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1_39.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.s9.com/Biography/Salonga-Lea
Corrected formatting/usage for http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view_article.php?article_id=69181
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/default.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608193322/http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.15&lon=120.583333&zoom=13 to http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.15&lon=120.583333&zoom=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angeles, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

ClarkAngelesjf9644 32.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Marqueejf0544 05.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Angeles, Philippines be renamed and moved to Angeles.

result:
Withdrawn by nom. Kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 14:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Angeles, Philippines → Angeles – Similar to Lucena (Calabarzon), the primary topic for "Angeles" is the Philippine city. Google Trends agrees with this, see https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=%2Fm%2F03g7bg,Angeles%20band,Angeles%20name (the band isn't even that popular). The "Los" in Los Angeles, on the other hand, is enough to distinguish the cities from each other. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Angeles without Los also refers to several US geos. "Philippines" here is helping all readers and harming none. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I agree in principle to the MOS:PHIL guideline to drop the word "city" from article titles, but we can't be dogmatic about this. In common speech almost everyone says "Angeles City". Per WP:COMMONNAME, I feel that Angeles City is the most appropriate title. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@P199: I somehow agree with you. While I support the elimination of "City" suffix for most unique titles (e.g. Guihulngan, Malolos, and Tagum) and confining the use of "City" for the likes of Iloilo City and Zamboanga City, I am leaning towards reinstating "City" suffix to two highly-urbanized cities that have no similarly-named places around the world but aren't the real WP:PRIMARYTOPIC:
- Angeles, Philippines -> Angeles City (in the Philippines Angeles may either refer to the city itself or to a noteworthy surname, hence the true primary topic concept is divided).
- Lapu-Lapu, Philippines -> Lapu-Lapu City (the primary topic of Lapu-Lapu is the hero himself, and as such the title redirects to the title with proper spelling, Lapulapu, and the name also rhymes with the local (and controversial) Luzon name for the grouper fish).
Also: future city of Bulakan goes under Bulakan City (if ever), because both Bulacan and Bulakan are still used interchangeably here (our province), despite erroneusly. Lucena shall leave as it is.

But perhaps this proposal is not suitable for this RM as this involves a possible modification of WP:MOSPHIL. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Or, we may go under a new format "XXX (city)". Like: Angeles (city) and Lapu-Lapu (city). But again, this needs some consensus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Let's just keep it to this RM. There will always be exceptions to the rule, so we'll need to consider them separately (and then add the outcomes to MOS:PHIL afterwards). As for Angeles (city), that is definitely no good. It is an unneeded disambig and not natural either as per WP:COMMONNAME. Regards, -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my dumb proposal. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 03:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 10 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angeles, Philippines → Angeles City – Per new consensus at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47#Moving forward on barangays plus some MOSPHIL discussion and the updated WP:MOSPHIL, regarding the simplification of title convention of Philippine cities into three types (<plain name> like Malolos, <usual disambiguation> like San Carlos, Negros Occidental, and <City suffix format> like Davao City), and abandoning the "x, Philippines" format, which is not a common name in most reliable sources and unnatural with respect to common usage here.

For Angeles City, "Angeles" alone is not enough because there are numerous unrelated topics bearing this name. It is also a surname, and as per Tambayan discussion that is now archived, Angeles may be related to sports (e.g. Los Angeles Lakers). Thus it fails to become a suitable title for this Philippine city. "Angeles (city)" is not natural, so the best option is Angeles City. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom and per my comments at the previous RM discussion. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The "(city)" in "Angeles (city)" doesn't need to be an issue here since several provinces are using this disambiguation method (e.g. Antique (province), Laguna (province)). "Angeles, Pampanga"—similar to Naga, Camarines Sur and Santiago, Isabela—would be a "normal" alternative. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Kulyat" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kulyat. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 22#Kulyat until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 02:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]