Talk:2012 tour of She Has a Name

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article 2012 tour of She Has a Name is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic star 2012 tour of She Has a Name is part of the She Has a Name series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 25, 2013.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Canada (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Crime (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Human rights (Rated FA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pedophilia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 
WikiProject Sexuality / Sex work  (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sex work task force.
 
WikiProject Theatre (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copyedited by Lfstevens, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 30, 2013. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 tour of She Has a Name/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 20:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of April 21, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Good use of structural formatting and paragraph organization. I'd only recommend a few things:
  1. Request a copyedit through a post to the folks over at WP:GOCE, and also please post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects with a polite request for some previously uninvolved editors to read over the article and perform some copyediting.
  2. Awards - I'd suggest to redo this section and make it a tabular format instead of paragraph format. There's a pretty good suggested formatting at the WP:GA quality page, Korn#Awards_and_nominations.
  3. Lede/intro - please add a couple sentences to the lede/intro summarizing the plot of the play itself.
  4. Talkback panels and fundraising - I'd recommend splitting the first paragraph in this sect into two smaller paragraphs.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, meticulously referenced.
3. Broad in coverage?: As noted above, good structure, nice paragraph organization, the article is indeed thorough for its intended scope.
4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral presentation, NPOV wording usage.
5. Article stability? No stability issues upon inspection of article edit history and talk page history.
6. Images?: Four images are used:
  1. File:She Has a Name.jpg = appropriate fair use rationale, image checks out okay.
  2. File:She Has a Name 2011 - Grooming.jpg image at Wikimedia Commons, but missing info in date field.
  3. File:RCMP officers Beth, Janice & Harp 2.jpg image at Wikimedia Commons, image checks out okay.
  4. File:She Has a Name 2012 - Voices.jpg image at Wikimedia Commons, but missing info in date field.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for taking on this nomination. I have switched the "Awards" section to a tabular format, added two sentences about the play's plot to the lead, split the first paragraph of the "Talkback panels and fundraising" section in two, added dates for the two images previously missing dates, and posted notices of this GAN on all the relevant WikiProjects with a note requesting independent copyedits. I have not requested a copyedit at WP:GOCE as this article has already received a copyedit from that group. Is a single article eligible for multiple GOCE copyedits? If so, I can submit this article for another. Neelix (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for such responsiveness to my recommendations, I'll perform another evaluation soon, taking this into account. — Cirt (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Passed as GA quality[edit]

Great job, thanks for the responsiveness to the above GA review recommendations, — Cirt (talk) 02:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Kudos[edit]

This is a very specific topic, kudos on pulling off the article so well. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Nicholas! Neelix (talk) 03:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

I believe that three categories should be readded to this article: Category:Abolitionism in North America, Category:Entertainment events in Canada, and Category:Human trafficking. The first category demonstrates that the purpose of this tour was to raise awareness about contemporary slavery in North America. The second demonstrates that the tour was in Canada and was also for the purpose of entertainment. The third demonstrates that it was not only the play itself but also the panel discussions that were about human trafficking. Neelix (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)