Talk:2023 Union Square riot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

article is trash[edit]

This article doesn’t really use “Wikipedia-style” language and sounds copy and pasted from news websites. Lmao 69.126.185.5 (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BEBOLD and edit it. Earwig disagrees with you that this article was "copy and pasted from news websites". elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My toxic boss once said:
"I don't need problems or suggestions. Eithet you have a solution or fuck off."
And that is what WP:BEBOLD is for. 2A02:A020:1:CB9C:D89D:BB71:BE52:1F32 (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
lmao and your name is literally your IP why don't you do something productive with your life instead of give out baseless info like this. use WP-BEBOLD Wikieism (talk) 17:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ahem. Unproductive comments notwithstanding, IP editors are human too. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:917D:D4E0:9CA4:9277 (talk) 00:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then you change it 52Timer (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't like something in the article, then be bold by editing it yourself and fixing it. This article isn't protected yet, so you can edit it just fine, without any restrictions. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 13:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then why did you decide to come here and talk shit about it? Be bold by clicking/tapping the "Edit" button on the top right, and edit it yourself! (P.S. sorry I'm late for this, but eh, better late than never right?) — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 12:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many local tv stations[edit]

In many places on the globe transmited info about it 2A02:3038:409:C52C:C407:7D39:1A00:693F (talk) 06:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baseless claims[edit]

"The giveaway caused a riot in Union Square Park, in which thousands of people engaged in a state of civil unrest during the time of the giveaway."

There were only 2000-5000 people present. How the fuck do you get 40-100%+ of a crowd to engage in civil unrest? Claiming that anyone present at a gathering where civil unrest occurs is automatically engaged in the unrest seems absurd, especially given this was a legal gathering with no known calls for violence by the organizers. Even if we assume that the !!!one thousand!!! police are included in that civil unrest, that's still only 3000-6000 people. Claiming that 33-100% were in a state of civil unrest seems very dubious unless the organizers or crowd were some kind of revolutionaries or whatnot.

This article seems like it was written by the NYPD or by a government that bans free assembly, essentially assuming anyone who goes to an event organized by a popular Twitch streamer: A popular *black* Twitch streamer at that, is *automatically* a rioter rather than an innocent civilian caught in a rowdy crowd, though it seems like this is not more rowdy than the aftermath of an average soccer game in many countries. It should be entirely obvious why claiming over half the people there were rioting needs better sourcing. 50.38.32.222 (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed a few sections to sound less like a everyone present was guilty by association. 50.38.32.222 (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Riot" should be changed to a more suitable word/phrase in the article[edit]

Calling it a "Riot" is contentious at the moment. While there was certainly unrest, I think the word riot should be changed to something like "Mob" or "UnnSquare Unrest" io for the time being as there are only charges and no prosecutions at the moment.

Edit: Will edit myself if there is no disagreement. 

Rayanblaq14 (talk) 13:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go with what the sources say. All the sources are calling it a riot. Nobody seems to be calling it "unrest". Databased (talk) 12:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Status[edit]

Now that the dust has settled on the AfD, anyone interested in bringing this article up to Good Article status? It probably will take a while based on the ensuing aftermath and coverage of his trial, but I think it's a good idea to look ahead and plan for it in advance. PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have considered it, but don't count on it. I don't actively seek GAs until I am positive an article is the best it could be. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. There's no deadline but I think this could make for a decent DYK nom in the future if anyone wants to bring it to GA. In the meantime, it would definitely be more beneficial to focus on just maintaining the article, especially within the next few days. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should we nominate it right now? 199.216.45.1 (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 August 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus to move. If anyone objects to my close I will revert it, as I could appear to be involved based on my previous nomination of this article for deletion, but I think consensus is sufficiently clear here (unanimous and well attended) that I can close it without issue. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 13:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Cenat Union Square giveaway → 2023 Union Square riot – The current name is what remained after the dust settled on a slightly convoluted AfD involving two articles. The problem is, this is an overly long, difficult to search for, slightly defamatory, and not-quite-backed-up-by-the-search-results kind of title. Titles should be WP:CONCISE, with the least amount of words employed to identify the event. This event is more known for the disturbance aspect than for the "giveaway" which served as the catalyst for it, and that is what people will search for. If Cenat ever does another giveaway without incident, no article will be written about it. Attaching Cenat's name to the incident seems unfair when we can simply associate it with the location in which it took place, especially if the extent of Cenat's intent to actually spark a riot is unclear. Finally, Kai Cenat Union Square giveaway gets slightly over 1M Google hits, vs a whopping 264M for Union Square riot. See for example, YouTube Streamer Faces Riot Charge After Union Square Park Erupts in Chaos, Melee in Union Square Shows the Real Power Of Popular Influencers, Union Square riot charges: NYPD: Streamer incited crowd that became violent, NYPD chief on Union Square Riot over PlayStation Giveaway, Twitch Streamer Kai Cenat charged over Union Square Riot. StonyBrook babble 12:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME. This is definitely the strongest evidence for a proposal I've seen in a long time. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, well-reasoned proposal. Both WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME apply and support the proposed new title. I don't see any real defamation concern, but the proposal remains sound when disregarding that. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 10:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, along with avoiding potential WP:BLP issues from adding his name to this event. PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sound opinion aside from the defamatory aspect of it. Erubea (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. U-dble (talk) 04:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I also had the same idea in the merge discussion. Rexxx7777 (talk) 00:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree based on the linked news articles. — Longchess (talk) 03:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support based on WP:COMMONNAME given that many sources and people refer to it as a riot. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 05:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Mellk (talk) 04:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review[edit]

CLOSED
The article has passed GA review.  Spintendo  04:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2023 Union Square riot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Spintendo (talk · contribs) 23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you're doing well. I'm Spintendo, and I'll be conducting this review. The Discussion section below is where we'll have most of our interactions. (I'm using the {{Fake heading}} template to preserve the integrity of the review and to minimize disruption to the transcluded table of contents which appears on the article's talk page.) I've divided the discussion section into subsections based on the headers from the article. Please feel free to place "done" or "fixed" -type comments, objections, or counter-proposals in each section for the issues I'll be bringing up there. Without further ado, let's begin!  Spintendo  23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Discussion
Lead section
  • The lead section contains references. While these are not banned, the ideal follows MOS:CITELEAD in that claims made in the lead section ought to be cited elsewhere in the article, as the lead section summarizes information found later in the main body.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • His collective of creators This should be described as "his business partners" because (a) it is a collective that he is a part of, and not his own collective (i.e., describing it as "his collective") and (b) the term "collective of creators" does not specify that these were content creators (i.e., what did he create?) and (c) the phrase sounds promotional by using industry jargon rather than long established phrases (e.g., just calling them "business partners").  Spintendo  23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Background section
  • This section would benefit from a {{Hatnote}} to both Kai Cenat and Union Square.

 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The background section should then contain a modicum of information on the location where the riot occurred. Union Square takes its name from the intersection of Broadway, originally a colonial and Indian path drifting across New York from the lower right to upper left, and the city's 19th-century street grid. Specifically, how Union Square is at the intersection of subway lines 4, 5, 6, L, N, Q, R, and W, an intersection which greatly facilitated the transportation of large amounts of people to the square.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This should be followed by more information on Cenat's background--not just the basics--but specifically those elements from his background which set the stage for the riot. The New York Times has good information on this:

    When Cenat, who was born in December 2001, became a teenager, the social internet was dominated by fleeting video clips on the platform Vine, which sprouted a generation of mini-celebrities who could express themselves in the six seconds available. When Cenat was attending high school at Frederick Douglass Academy in Harlem, a YouTuber named Jake Paul began to attract attention, staging media-baiting pranks that made him the bane of his West Hollywood neighborhood. And by the time Cenat was in college at the State University of New York at Morrisville, a charismatic gamer who went by the name Ninja had become a superstar on Twitch, with tens of thousands tuning in to watch him play the video game Fortnite. By then, Cenat had begun to travel to Atlanta to work with a collective of fellow entertainers that called itself A.M.P., for Any Means Possible.[1]

 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It should then cover how this event was not his first indulgence in giveaways. In July of that year, he surprised a Massachusetts woman he used to visit in the summers with $20,000, saying she had been a second mother to him, and she deserved it. (He has iffy luck with giveaways; the woman, Cathy Parker, was reluctant to accept the money.)  Spintendo  23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Spintendo, is this summary ok?

      Union Square, the location of the riot, was named after the intersection of Broadway and the city's 19th-century street grid. It is located at the intersections of the 4, 5, 6, L, N, Q, R, and W subway lines, which provided the ease of the transportion of large amounts of people to the square. Cenat attended Frederick Douglass Academy and the State University of New York at Morrisville. Around the time of him attending university, he traveled to Atlanta, Georgia to work with a group of Internet personalities called Any Means Possible (AMP). This is not Cenat's first giveaway, as he surprised a Massachusetts woman he used to visit with $20,000, saying she was a second mother to him, and that she deserved it. The woman, Cathy Parker, was unwilling to accept the money.

      — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 02:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is good information but let's hold off on adding it. The information about the subway and the square needs some slight paraphrasing (I can take care of that) and a source (I got that too) then we can add it.  Spintendo  08:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Spintendo, I can't find any reliable sources about the ease of the transportation of a large amount of people to the square. — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a live stream on August 2, he claimed that he would give away gift cards, headphones, gaming chairs, computers, webcams, keyboards, and microphones to attendees who could correctly answer questions about YouTube and live streaming.


Would it be suitable to reword "YouTube and live streaming" to "Internet culture" as YouTube and livestreaming usually fall under that umbrella? — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 15:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The source for the ease of transport is here.[2] There is also Cenat himself: "Mr. Cenat, who is from the Bronx, told his Twitch followers on Wednesday that he would be in Union Square on Friday. He asked how many fans would show up. A flurry of answers came in: 1,000, 5,000, 10,000. A friend sitting next to him said so many would come that Mr. Cenat would need security and barricades. “All trains go here so there’s no excuse,” Mr. Cenat told those watching."[3]  Spintendo  20:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 This portion is completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following year, he gained popularity after a series of livestreams featuring artists such as Drake, 21 Savage, Toosii and Lil Baby. This should be reworded to "The following year he gained popularity after producing a series of livestreams with Drake, 21 Savage, Toosii and Lil Baby".
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In February 2023, during a subathon—an event in which a livestreamer continuously streams in an attempt to gain paid subscribers, Cenat joined United Talent Agency. It's unclear, did Cenat join the talent agency during the livestream? if so, it should be reworded to state that clearly, such as "in February 2023, Cenat filmed his joining of the United Talent Agency during a livestreamed subathon." We can also delete the definition of subathon, since we'll have the Wiktionary page Wikilinked as shown in my example.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also removed the strikeout font that was added above. We don't need to use that here. That's mostly used in WP:REDACT, when an editor wants to alter their own previously entered text after another editor has replied following their post.  Spintendo  08:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the days preceding the gathering, Cenat announced that he would give away PlayStation 5 consoles at 4 p.m. in Union Square along 14th Street,[4] joined by Fanum, Duke Dennis and Agent00, three Twitch streamers. should be "In the days preceding the gathering, Cenat announced that he would give away PlayStation 5 consoles at 4 p.m. in Union Square along 14th Street, where he would be joined by Fanum, Duke Dennis and Agent00, three Twitch streamers.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In a live stream on August 2, he claimed that he would give away gift cards... This should state "In a livestream on August 2, Cenat claimed...."
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cenat did not have a permit for the gathering. On the day of the giveaway, he posted on Twitter that he would be live streaming the event at 3:30 p.m. should be "Despite not having secured a permit for a gathering at Union Square, Cenat posted on Twitter that he would be live streaming the event at 3:30 p.m."
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 13:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Giveaway and subsequent riot section
  • By 1:30 p.m. the area was filled with fans. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) became aware of the gathering at the same time, as dozens of people began converging. By 3 p.m., a large crowd had gathered in Union Square The timeline is unclear here. It says that the area was filled with fans at 1:30, but then again at 3pm it states a large croud had gathered. But didn't the crowd get there at 1:30, when it was "filled with fans?" I would think an area "filled with fans" could be considered "a crowd", although I understand that at 1:30 it was only fans while by 3:30 it was more of a mixture of fans and not fans (see next entry)
  • partially drawn to the event by further word of the giveaway outside Cenat's fans. "many of whom were drawn to the event by word of mouth from sources outside of Cenat's fans" or something to that effect.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • By 3:30 p.m., the NYPD had mobilized dozens of officers to the area and established a perimeter; the group took down barriers and conflict broke out between police and members of the crowd. which group took down barriers?
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Members of the crowd climbed up a gazebo, street signs, vehicles including a bus, and a George Washington statue I don't think it's possible to "climb up" a bus or vehicle. Street signs and statues you can climb up, but vehicles including buses are climbed upon.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Social media posts of the riot surfaced around the same time. what time would that be?
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to the NYPD, individuals walked around with shovels and axes from a nearby construction site and lit off fireworks " According to the NYPD, individuals walked around with shovels and axes taken from a nearby construction site, while others lit fireworks."
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The NYPD called on an estimated one thousand officers to respond as part of a level four mobilization at what time did this occur?
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • At least two thousand people came to the event, though police estimate that three to five thousand people were present. who's estimate is the two thousand number?
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I guess I'll answer my own question here: It was the NYPD, and their initial estimate was 3-5K ppl  Completed  Spintendo  04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The NYPD does not use tear gas. But the source given for this claim confirms that they do use pepper spray. It's unlikely that Cenat, if he made this claim, really knows what the difference between tear gas and pepper spray is. He may have seen one used while assuming it was the other. In any event, the claim that NYPD does not use tear gas should be accompanied with the statement that they do use pepper spray.  Spintendo  20:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The archive link for the following reference did not take:
    • Sung, Morgan (4 August 2023). "Twitch streamer's PS5 giveaway sparks Union Square 'riot'". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  • Since there was no "giveaway", I'm wondering if using that term is the best for this section's title. What are your thoughts on this?  Spintendo  04:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Spintendo, seems reasonable. No one got anything valuable at the end, apart from some cuts, bruises, and arrests.
 Done— Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 13:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • As for the TechCrunch archives, I think they might be broken. Older archives do not work. — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cenat was either taken into police custody or let go on his accord and charged with inciting a riot and unlawful assembly. I'm not sure this timeline works, but if it's what media has reported, then were stuck with it. It should at least state he was released "on his own accord after being charged with..." if the charges came that day, if they were the next day it should say"Cenat was initially allowed to leave the area on his own accord but was charged ____" with it stating whenever the time and day he was charged.  Spintendo  06:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Aftermath section
  • The information in this section mostly concerns events referring to the same day, rather than afterwards, so I'm not sure this heading works. Thoughts?
  • At approximately 5:00 p.m., Cenat was taken into police custody and charged with inciting a riot and unlawful assembly This contradicts NYTimes reporting, which stated Kai left the scene of his own volition (or was at least given a friendly escort): "Rather than arrest Mr. Cenat immediately, for example, the police could have used him to address the crowd, he said. “The minute that the N.Y.P.D. moved Kai Cenat from the scene, they lost their chance to leverage him,” Mr. Raymond said."  Spintendo  04:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Spintendo, maybe I could add a note that says that how Cenat was arrested is disputed? — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Done— Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        • I wouldn't say it was disputed, it's more of an "unknown".
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • To gain a better grasp of events, here is my own personal timeline constructed by combining elements from the Washington Post, WABC-7-NY, NYTimes, and CNN sources. It provides a decent timeline/narrative for Cenat's entrance and departure, as well as some of the other events. Let's not place it in the article though — I have it here just for our use, as we comb through the GA:
  • Wednesday, August 2nd, Kai Cenat's Instagram story announces a giveaway to start at Union Square Park on Friday, August 4 at 4 p.m.
  • Friday, August 4th 12:00 p.m. Cenat repeats messages on instagram and twitch.
  • 1:30 p.m., NYPD starts to became aware of a large crowd (around 300 or so) of teens assembling in Union Square
  • By 3 p.m., that number has grown exponentially, as the giveaway goes viral and thousands began arriving in Union Square. The park was soon filled with people obstructing traffic
  • Around 3:30, the crowd begins taking down barriers and throwing objects at police. People also jumped on cars as unrest grew.
  • At 3:48 p.m. the New York Police Department says on X,"Due to police activity, avoid the area surrounding Union Square Park & use alternate routes. Expect a police presence in the area and residual traffic delays."
  • 3:50 p.m., a large police bus moves into position at the square, which will later begin filling up with arrests.
  • 4:00 p.m., Cenat arrives. During a short stream inside his vehicle, Cenat flashes a fistful of what he says are $100 gift cards stored in a brown CVS paper bag to give away. When he notices the chaos, his descriptions immediately take an ominous tone: "They're throwing tear gas out there, we're not going to do nothing until it's safe . . . everybody for themselves, because it's a war out there man."
  • Seconds later, Cenat's vehicle comes to a stop and he exits, but is immediately swarmed by fans. The stream cuts out shortly after Cenat's bodyguards begin pushing people away from him. Law enforcement eventually remove Cenat from the park for safety reasons. He is not officially placed "in custody" at that time, and is free to leave.
  • With Cenat now gone (along with, presumably, all the gift cards as well as any hoped for PS5's) the crowd's frustration peaks from roughly 4:15 - 4:55 p.m., and the riot is in full swing, encompassing food vendor carts being upset and bottles thrown. The misuse of the aforementioned construction equipment occurs during the next 40 minutes. Arrested individuals are placed on the bus while the bus itself becomes the target of projectiles.
  • By 5 p.m., police, some on horseback, have finally organized enough that they begin making coordinated inroads into segregating and dispersing the crowd. This largely takes place over the course of the next hour.
  • As it grows closer to 6 p.m., police have pushed much of the crowd well out of the park.[4][5][6]

Response section
  • At a press conference, Maddrey stated, "When I go back later on this evening, I will have an after-action determine [sic] exactly what our steps were. We can't allow this to happen again in the future". If these are the mayor's actual words, then we need a {{sic}} template.
 Done Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only responses here are the mayor and AMP. There could be more from the Civilian Complaint Review Board (which reviews accusations of police brutality, and who issued a statement about the riot) as well as more specific examples of the most severe accusations which were made against the police and which were reported on in the NYTimes.  Spintendo  04:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Titling this as "Response" makes it seem like it should be the police response that day. Lets change the "subsequent riot" heading to just read as Union Square riot and let's move everything in this section to the Aftermath section.  Spintendo  06:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cenat's response, it should be noted, came August 10, roughly 6 days afterwards.

    Cenat said, "I don't condone any of the things that went on that day. None of that is cool." He reiterated that he is "beyond disappointed in anybody who became destructive that day. Anything we do like this has to be safe and fun. We can't just be running around and destroying this and destroying that. I want y'all to know that none of that is how I wanted any of this to go. I'm trying to get through this and stuff like that (the charges) and handle it the correct way. If I ever wanna do something like this in the future, I gotta make the right calls, do the right things. I can't stress enough it was not my intention, bro, I don't condone any of the things that went on Friday." Cenat told his followers on Twitch that for the time being, he is going to take a break from streaming to handle the upcoming court dates, adding his first one is August 16. He also urged the media to leave his family alone.[5]

  • It should also be noted that exactly 3 weeks after the riot, on August 25, the Austin-based talent management company "Night" announced the acquisition of LFM Management, the New York-based content creator managing firm. That move placed Night as the talent management for Kai Cenat and the other members of AMP.  Spintendo  05:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Analysis section
  • I like what I see in the analysis section. In a way, this is the most important section, because it is here that any "meaning" is brought to the riot as far as society is concerned. Obviously because it's so recent, there is not much scholarly research into this event, but rest assured, there should be more trickling in as time passes, because this was an important event from a sociological viewpoint. I'll do a bit more searching on some other databases (EBSCOHost, etc.) and see what I can find. Then I'll go back through our discussion and reply to any comments/suggestions of yours that I may have missed so far, and to check that suggestions were addressed, then we can wrap this up!  Spintendo  23:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nothing additional found after a broad search, but this section will likely grow in the future.  Spintendo  17:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Bromwich, Jonah E. (9 August 2023). "Union Square Melee Shows an Influencer's Power Unleashed in Real Life". The New York Times. p. A17. Archived from the original on 11 August 2023.
  2. ^ Brookhiser, Richard (24 August 2023). "Under the Influence". National Review. No. 46.
  3. ^ Marcius, Chelsia Rose; Cramer, Maria (8 August 2023). "How New York Lost and Regained Control of Union Square". The New York Times.
  4. ^ Anderson, Nic F.; Costa, João (10 August 2023). "Kai Cenat condemns NYC Union Square melee, says 'it was not my intention'". CNN.
  5. ^ a b "16 sought in Union Square riot for damaging car during Kai Cenat event". ABC7 New York. 15 August 2023.
  6. ^ Rosenzweig-Ziff, Dan; Park, Gene; Bisset, Victoria; Bellware, Kim (5 August 2023). "Twitch streamer Kai Cenat charged with inciting riot after NYC giveaway". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 10 August 2023.
Final grammar check
  • In February 2023, the United Talent Agency announced that they would represent Cenat during a subathon. At the end of the livestream, he had amassed 300,000 Twitch subscribers, a record for the platform. It's not clear whose subathon this was, since it merely mentions UTA announcing they would represent Cenat during "a subathon". This was his subathon correct? I it was his, how did they come to make the mention?  Spintendo  17:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Spintendo, oh yeah, it was his subathon. I've gone ahead and clarified that in the article.  Done— Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 20:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  02:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • The WaPo article doesn't clarify on how did they come to make the mention, though. — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kai Cenat is an American livestreamer and YouTuber. He attended Frederick Douglass Academy and the State University of New York at Morrisville. Around the time of him attending university, If the university is already mentioned, it doesnt need to be mentioned a second time. And while it says "at this time", the time period for when he went to this university is not stated.  Spintendo  17:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Spintendo, so something along the lines of:

At this time, Cenat traveled to Atlanta, Georgia to work with a group of Internet personalities called Any Means Possible (AMP), which he joined in 2020.

right? — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've added it anyways, so  Done— Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Completed  Spintendo  02:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the days preceding the gathering, Cenat announced that he would give away PlayStation 5 consoles at 4 p.m. in Union Square along 14th Street, where he would be joined by Fanum, Duke Dennis and Agent00 We need Wikilinks for these three individuals, if they exist as articles.  Spintendo  17:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Spintendo, I only added a wikilink to Fanum's article because it was the only one I could find.  Partly done— Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added Duke Dennis as a redlink, as his name is already redlinked in the Duke disambiguation page, it may not be long before he gets his own article.
  • I've hidden the final WSJ article claim regading Cenat's ability to "mend relations with the police". As that article is pay-walled, I cannot verify the claim. That would need to occur in order to be able to see if it pertains to the aftermath section. The author involved may have been referring to "having had the opportunity to mend relations at the time or they may mean he possesses an everlasting opportunity to mend relations. I can't say for sure.  Spintendo  03:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
GA Final review
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2023_Union_Square_riot&oldid=1196951451"