Talk:Airport & South Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I suggest re-directing the separate articles back, the main article has been re-written and perfectly referenced, clearly no need for duplication. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 23:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just went over the main article and read over it, actually I'm re-directing it back now. JROBBO just recently did a major re-write and properly referenced the article --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 23:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AndyZ Peer Review Suggestions[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, JRG 09:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stations table[edit]

After being accused of being a vandal, I thought I'd raise this here. I think that the large station table on this and other Cityrail pages is too big and directory like for an encyclopaedia page. Would anyone read it? It seems a rehash of information that could easily be found on the official Cityrail website. Thoughts (with civility please)? Endarrt 01:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most information on Wikipedia is a rehash of information that can be found elsewhere, that is why we reference articles. aliasd·U·T 14:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the stations table. In my view, Wikipedia is not a timetable. Wikipedia is generally viewed to be not a travel guide - what use is the table to anyone other than intending travellers? And the technical arcana (like ticketing codes) is irrelevant in an encyclopaedia context. TransitPolice 09:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This table and its equivalents elsewhere were found to be fine for Wikipedia - and its equivalents elsewhere have been kept, including, might I say, in a Featured Article. This is staying. JRG 10:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, JRG. You can't just dictate that "this is staying". We'll discuss it. For now it can be removed as it is not referenced anywhere but in CityRail's own materials. TransitPolice 10:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This table was fine on the Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra page, and was approved as a Featured Article, and User:Gareth Aus has kindly fixed all the other tables up for us. I'm happy to remove the dots like in the ESIRL page and write a separate section on the stopping patterns, but the rest of it is legitimate and acceptable content. JRG 11:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separate East Hills line and Airport Link pages[edit]

See discussion at Talk:East Hills railway line, Sydney. TransitPolice 09:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Airport Line page has been merged due to a complete duplication of information. There is in fact nothing on that page that is not a duplication. The page therefore amounts to a POV content fork by Joestella, and as they are undesirable on Wikipedia, it should be deleted or merged into a suitable page. This is a justified redirect. The East Hills line, on the other hand is a justified separate page because of The Fulch's history additions, but we need to fix it up so it acts as a summary style subsidiary spinoff. JRG 22:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern railway line, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airport and East Hills lines timetable 2010 cityrail.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Airport and East Hills lines timetable 2010 cityrail.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Airport and East Hills Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:North Shore, Northern & Western Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Airport_%26_South_Line&oldid=1198213249"