Talk:David Peace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GB84[edit]

What happened to the standalone _GB84_ page? As a histrocial novel about the miners' strike of 1984-5, with real figures - Scargill, Thatcher - and historically based figures in it, it seems strange to miss the dedicated page out.

comment[edit]

Can we ditch the "amazingly well-written" in the Clough book section? This isn't a Year 9 English homework entitled 'My Favourite Book.' 88.109.6.79


Original Research, The Man Himself, or a PR?[edit]

How come whoever wrote this seems to know the titles of the novels Peace will be writing about six years in advance? This is needs to be referenced to its source. Also, unless anyone can give me a good reason why I shouldn't, I'm going to delete all the stuff above debating his work - this isn't the place for it.Bedesboy (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no reason for commenting out identifiers such as ISBNs in these entries. They should be left alone so that readers can see them. Keith D (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove banner?[edit]

I have added quite a few citations so it seems to be well sourced now, the banner could be removed? Enderbyinside (talk) 13:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the banner above the article that says "needs additional citations for verification". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enderbyinside (talkcontribs) 13:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant 'template', not used to the jargon yet. As there is not a huge amount of concern either way I will remove the current template, it can be re-instated, or another template added, if anyone is concerned. Enderbyinside (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If people have new problems then would be useful to use the inline templates, so we know where the problem is rather than one at the top of the article. Keith D (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, noted. Enderbyinside (talk) 14:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving polytechnic[edit]

It says he left polytechnic to go to Istanbul. Does this mean left without finishing his studies? 180.219.83.36 (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]