Talk:Diana Hacker

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diana Hacker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Diana Hacker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that according to the Open Syllabus Project, Diana Hacker is the second most-read female author on college campuses after Kate L. Turabian?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Diana Hacker.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that according to the Open Syllabus Project, Diana Hacker is the second most-read female author on college campuses after Kate L. Turabian? Source: Time
- ALT1: ... that according to the Open Syllabus Project, Diana Hacker's works appear on more than 25,500 syllabi, ahead of Aristotle? Source: EdSurge
- Reviewed: TBA

Created by Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk). Self-nominated at 06:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I couldn't access the first source but I could access the second. Looks good, the only minor concern I had was the site edsurge.com. It looked like it might not be a reliable source but it is operated by a professional education society (International Society for Technology in Education) and I have heard of them before so I know they're not some fly by night operation. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that we just had Template:Did you know nominations/Open Syllabus Project, I'm wondering if this isn't effectively two hooks on the same topic? -- RoySmith (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @RoySmith: The only reason how I found out about Hacker was after I wrote the Open Syllabus Project page. If you prefer, we can drop the "according to the Open Syllabus Project" attribution since I do not believe the above hooks are highly contested opinions. Thank you, Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @RoySmith: I'd put in for the record that no one stopped me from running Joni Albrecht and Julie Schmit-Albin as separate hooks – I don't think we'd have a policy against something like this, although I would have admittedly preferred a double hook. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]