Talk:Dick Allen

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians / Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Dodgers / Phillies / Cardinals Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies.
	This article is supported by WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals (assessed as Low-importance).

Dick/Richie[edit]

Source on the re-write of the name controversy is Bill James's excellent sketch biography of him in The Baseball Book 1990. Ellsworth 20:14, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hall of Fame[edit]

Dick is widely considered to be one of the best players not in the Hall of Fame. There should be some mention of this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.192.53.216 (talk • contribs) .

Then make it so! Just cite your sources please. :) —Wknight94 (talk) 21:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and blp[edit]

Thsi article contains a ton of negative info without citing sources, and thereofre violates WP:BLP. Please clean it up. Thanks. Marcus Taylor 21:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. It's rare if not impossible to find ex-teammates of Allen who are critical of his clubhouse presence. That should count more than the negative media coverage and uninformed fan opinions that seem to be the (uncited) sources for much of this very biased Wikipedia article. See http://www.whitesoxinteractive.com/rwas/index.php?category=11&id=2065 for reliable quotes from former managers and teammates who directly contradict many of the Wiki article's negative assertions. Cipherdom (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a guy who took to wearing a batting helmet on the field because people were throwing stuff at him. You can't gloss over the negative public image, even if it was unfair, as with guys with similar "jackets" like Roger Maris and Eddie Murray. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 17:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not a very specific complaint. It's hard to know what to remove "immediately" when the complainant hasn't specified what to remove. Maybe (news flash!) he could do that work himself instead of expecting others to do it for him. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 17:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the pendulum has swung the other way. In a category of articles notorious for their POV and spin, this baseball player bio ranks high above others in syrupy praise of all manner of schtick.--Reedmalloy (talk) 16:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this article seems to give a lot of "information" without citing it on both sides. The section on his singing has no information. And, respecting the controversy on the 6-and-a-half-game blowout in '64 (there's a song about it by Chris Snider) something should be mentioned about whether he made a lot of fielding errors in that 10-game stretch. Also, why mention how he batted in the last 12 games if it's only the last 10 they started losing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Admiral meriweather (talk • contribs) 15:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like issues with unsourced info in this article have been prevalent for two years now. I'm going to go through and start lopping things out of it on the morrow. Seriously, some of this stuff is just absurdly unencyclopedic (ie. The tone and texture of his voice has even drawn comparisons to esteemed Harptones' lead singer Willie Winfield.)
--K10wnsta (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

another good link[edit]

http://www.h-net.org/~hns/articles/2005/080805a.html UnclePaco 05:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism?[edit]

Portions of this article appear to have been copied, nearly or totally verbatim, from a book called Magic Valley Cowboys Players. (Compare first couple of paragraphs to the overview here.) This is obviously a copyvio problem. I'll have a go at removing and/or rewriting as time permits, but I won't have the time for awhile -- if anyone feels motivated to begin the process, be my guest, since the sooner copyvios are fixed, the better. DoctorJoeE ^{review transgressions}/_{talk to me!} 20:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dick Allen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]