Talk:Don't Look Back (Heroes)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don't Look Back (Heroes) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage / Heroes Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Heroes task force.

day-dream?

i know this kind of digresses from the point, but the whole scene at the end of the episode with hiro in new york, was he just imagining that? i thought he was but im not sure.--Late Leo 00:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guest Starring

Listen, I think we should list all those that are given credit as guest starring. I'm not sure who the original poster was for that inclusion, but just because the actors are considered recurring doesn't make their guest appearance any less important. I vote for listing the entire guest star list on each episode, who else is behind me? --DJ Chair 13:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We really don't need to list guest stars that appear inn basically every episode, only one or maybe 2-offs.--A c1983fan^{(yell at me)} 13:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How come? Isn't the point of wikipedia to be an encyclopedic collection of knowledge about everything? Shouldn't we include all their appearances? Especially if the future turns them into true characters? --DJ Chair 13:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you...see the list I had to remove? Even if every one of them was notible—as in an article and such, which was hardly the case.—and made a single, notible appearance in the series, it was still excessively long. Not ever table of a table should be used, let alone abused like that. Someone said an actress from a crime drama guest starred in this episode. That's notible. Jerry Lewis on Law & Order: SVU? That's notible. Hell, even Justin Hartley as Green Arrow on Smallville is more notible than the freaky credits substitute we had listed. Sorry, but the article is just better off not mentioning every one person believed to have "guest starred" at in this ep. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 16:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Back in Japan...

Hiro transports himself back to Japan at the end of the episode. While there's no question that he's back in Japan, and on the same subway car he left from (which, given the clockwork regularity of Tokyo subway trains, is entirely possible even if it's a different day) - is he really there on the same day he left? When he goes into work, Ando states that he's been missing for 2 days. Did he lose those days in the time travel? Or did he just stay home and read comic books for 2 days? --Lurlock 17:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, he made cranes out of them. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The narrator's identity.

In the section called Narration by Sendhil Ramamurthy, is it OK to use the actor's name instead of the character's name, Mohinder Suresh? The Closed Captions show "(Mohinder)" before the actual text of what he says, so my guess is that the intention is that it is Suresh speaking, rather than an anonymous narrator. — Laserion 22:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree - I strongly suspect that the narration is supposed to be from Mohinder. He's not speaking about the television show, but about the world in which it is set. --Ckatz^chat _spy 01:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter seeing the future

How is Peter able to see the future? He hasn't met Isaac yet, has he?84.53.74.196 15:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC) A: That is another of Peter ability, sort of Vision, in his dream —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.25.7 (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I have attempted to rewrite the plot summary as I did for Genesis, as well as removed the Narration and Trivia sections. I recommend other editors to take a look and make the necessary improvements to it, particularly in the area of sourcing, as I have intentionally neglected that in favor of merely condensing the plot summary at this point. I believe others are better qualified to make those adjustments. I have put the page at Talk:Don't Look Back (Heroes)/Temp. --iTocapa ^t 19:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this one. As with "Genesis", I've restored some on the deleted material and formatted it in a more encyclopedic manner, and made a first pass at a synopsis. I'll try to start integrating some real-world analysis (properly referenced, of course) over the next few days. --Ckatz^chat _spy 08:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how an IP just deleted the entire "Trivia" section, I've gone ahead and replaced the old, oversized plot with the new version. Thanks again. --Ckatz^chat _spy 08:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do we still need the temp page? Otherwise I'll delete it. — Edokter • Talk • 23:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. --iTocapa ^t 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers

I think you should not include spoilers inside the episodes plot... such as "this explains what will happen in episode xxx". If one is reading the plot to catch up with a missed episode, this might be annoying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.118.213.198 (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, Wikipedia is not censored as per WP:SPOILER, so they are quite appropriate. Having said that... It's not a particularly good sentance, so I've been bold and rewritten the information pertinant to the plot -- WORM MЯOW 11:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]