Talk:Elizabeth Haldane

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Nursing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

A web search does suggest notability. Eg http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9038853 But we need to capture that here. Regards, Ben Aveling 16:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This hasn't been provided, and yet Duncharris (talk · contribs) continues to remove the notability tag. --Ragib 19:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add the notability into the article then, don't post dubious links. Never heard of her, support deletion based on what is included on this WP page.Michael Dorosh 19:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "dubious links"? EB isn't exactly "dubious". Guettarda 20:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to chase down everything she did (which if memory serves was actually quite a lot) but I've added on detail that by itself should establish notability. JoshuaZ 20:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and unfortunately your one-sentence addition contained an extraneous word and lacked capitalization. ;-) Michael Dorosh 20:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rather thought the point of writing Wikipedia articles was to actually write something worthy of being called an article. One sentence and a link to any website, EB or not, is called a waste of everyone's time. If anyone really cares about this subject, they'll take the time to write a good article.Michael Dorosh 20:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "bad-faithness" of my nomination, I added the afd based on this version of the article. WP:V clearly states that

The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references.

I added a tag requesting proof of notability of the subject close to 3 weeks ago, and wasn't provided any. Thanks. --Ragib 20:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems clear from the web that she is notable, but it's hard to tell that from this article. Were this still on AFD I would probably vote "delete without prejudice against recreation". Regards, Ben Aveling 10:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone add something more to this article? Otherwise, it can easily be merged with Haldane family --Ragib 20:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She seems to have translated Descartes works into English, source. Seems like it should be mentioned.--droptone (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a photograph and some content to this biography and I have yet more to add in the future. Surely it can now be taken down from mere 'stub' status. (Ajsinclair (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth Haldane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]