Talk:Enlil and Ninlil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The assertion "Robert S. Falkowitz discusses the possibility that the gods referred to were real people, saying "There are no indications in the narrative that Enlil and Ninlil are anything other than human. Semantic classifiers in the writing system and stock epithets categorize them as divine."" is an unexpected interpretation of my statement. I did not state that Enlil and Ninlil were real people. I stated that the narrative of the text portrays them as human. Any resemblance to real people was purely coincidental. Robert Falkowitz (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]