Eurosia Fabris was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Eurosia Fabris is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
You should give inline citations and for the ones where you are using URLs, you should use the {{cite web}} template and record the date you viewed the site. See WP:CITE for details on how to source... plange 04:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's been a week and while I don't agree with the original criticism, (Inline citation format isn't a strict requirement) the many, many, many citation needed tags do clearly make this article not well-referenced. Many of the requests may be frivolous with so many, but there's gotta be more sources for all this stuff. Homestarmy 17:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a line under references that cites the major source for the entire article. I also replaced all the html refs with the cite web template. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 11:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that the image on this page is insufficiently tagged. Click the image and see the note in the fair use tag. This article could also be improved in some other ways:
In-line citations would be a bonus.
I have marked the last sentence "citation needed". Not only is a citation needed for the controversy, but also for the response that overpopulation may not be a problem after all. Preferably, the latter would cite not a generic article on overpopulation, but rather a published rebuttal to critics of the church's pro-reproduction stance.
From the lead-in: "Mamma Rosa, was best known to Catholics as a model of holiness in the daily life of a Catholic family." Does the past-tense "was" refer to her lifetime? Was she well-known to Catholics during her life or only posthumously?
The "early life" section has short, choppy paragraphs that could be made to flow more smoothly.
The article does not strike me as one that meets the "compelling prose" requirement for a GA article. It gives basic factual information, but is not extraordinarily well-written. Perhaps it could use some tasty tidbits, interesting but brief quotations of primary sources, or quotations by PJPII and other church leaders concerning her importance to Catholics.
Footnote 3 is repeated. It might be better to make the second reference footnote 4 and write "ibid." as the reference.
Hey, guys. I created this article one day on a whim. I'm not even Catholic, but I'm glad that it was nominated for GA. Although I hope it gets it at some point, I really have no interest in helping it along. Thanks, JHMM13 (T | C) 23:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
23:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)