Talk:GeForce 4 series

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Kelly Metzger (2 participants)
David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (8 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (8 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Super Mutant (12 participants)
Police Trainer (2 participants; relisted)
Beam Invader (5 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (4 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (12 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (3 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Market Acceptance -or- Apple Macintosh Use[edit]

Apple used GeForce4 MX widely with their G4 Quicksilver 2002 models for example, utilizing a custom Apple firmware.

Is this significant enough to warrant mentioning in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.242.228.188 (talk) 02:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MX440 w/ AGPx Issues[edit]

I have one and whenever I play fullscreen games even at minumum graphics it freezes, it can't be pverheating, because I added a fan to the tower that flowed air threw the whol tower but most of it ran over the graphics card. What the heck is wrong guys? *I have Windows XP Pro*

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Batterup91111 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These cards doesn't work with free software. That could maybe be added. --212.247.27.187 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'The GeForce 4 Ti outperformed the older GeForce 3 by a significant but modest margin.'

Umm, what? Surely significant and modest can't be used together like that... ?

Yeah it's fine, a modest gain a share price could 0.001 or something but it would be significant if it was the highest that share had risen.

Yes, in this case significant = important. Bufflo 23:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Known Problems"

I can attest that one of 3 GeForce 4 cards, my Ti 4200 and one of the two Ti 4600 cards had fans that completely failed. On the 4200, I replaced the cooler with an identical, previously used one, and the 4600's cooler was replaced with an aftermarket ThermalTake Crystal Orb.

I don't know if anyone else cares about this, but I figured it could be useful to someone, and it at least helps to verify the information in that section of the article itself. 71.201.59.110 05:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've found that basically every single fan on video cards from those days died. Cards as new as a 6800 have fans die. You can get a lot more life out of them by pulling off the sticker on one side and oiling the bearing. The fans are just cheap junk. Newer cards with 60-80mm fans I think will have better longevity cuz they simply look a lot higher quality than those coolers of yesteryear, but who knows.--Swaaye 22:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RAMDAC[edit]

The GeForce4 had a 350 MHz RAMDAC, I think.

Dual 350 MHz RAMDACs actually. One for each of the two monitor hookups. Older cards typically had an internal RAMDAC and another separate RAMDAC chip for the 2nd monitor (if multimon was even supported). GF4 had two integrated. --Swaaye 22:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can attest to that I had to replace the HSF on my TNT2 Ultra when i got it out of mothballs because it was dead Candle 86 02:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

update[edit]

The Ti and MX tables got an overhaul

ok who got in and played with the tables, i just had to fix some issues with the bandwith and specs again, for refrance the PCX4300 has the same memory width as the MX440 does at 128bit and the same clocks, the MX4000 came in 64 or 128bit. Also the MX460 supports 128mb of memory all NV17's do support it and some last gen MX460's had 128mb Candle 86 02:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FX5200[edit]

This kept the MX440 in production while the 5200 was discontinued,

Why is it, then, that you can still bye them?

83.252.21.250 (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]