Talk:HMS Marlborough (1855)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Marlborough (1855) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

possible pic[edit]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/hms-marlborough-off-gibraltar-29978

©Geni 21:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Post-1861 armament[edit]

Currently the article suggests that Marlborough was mounting some Whitworth 70-pounders. I am not aware that these were ever introduced as service guns in the RN. Armstrong was contractually favoured at the time. I also have copies of the Admiralty draughts as drawn in 1861, showing the ship after completion of the refit, and they make no mention of 70-pounder shot stowage. There are however plenty of references to 40-pounder and 100-pounder (which would have in reality been 110-pounder) shot stowage throughout the ship - both Armstrong guns that we know were in service use. Anyone more knowledgable able to pitch in?

Pre-refit she was almost certainly carrying a fairly uniform 32-pounder fit, but I have seen some suggestion that she may have had some 68-pounders as well, not just in the bow chase position. Martocticvs (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]