This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is mostly based on primary sources from Langevin. This does not establish her notability well enough, the requirement for article creation. Otherwise it's interesting reading and shows that acupuncture needles can be used to stretch tissues, which says nothing at all about the worth of acupuncture. Therefore I'm going to nominate this for deletion. The quick addition of independent sources may save it. Arguing, without such additions, will not save it. -- Brangifer (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've tweaked it a little, thanks for feedback -A1candidate (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A litiany of praises and achievements of a doctor concerned primarily with research on alternative medicine, which has already once been nominated for deletion, after which more resounding praise was added. Please check this article Edaham (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm I couldn't find the deletion discussion. —PaleoNeonate – 11:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was adding some changes to the NCCIH page when I realized that Helene Langevin's page needs a rewrite. She is now the director of NCCIH. As recommended in previous talk comments, I will make it less like a resume and add more secondary sources. Any comments or recommendations are welcome.
Alhill42 (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking forward to learning more about this person. Thanks for taking this on. Sgerbic (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"NCCIA director is a career, non-political position"[edit]
The whole NCCIH (H, not A) is a political organization. It would not exist if certain politicians had not lobbied for more quackery and less science. The first director resigned because those politicians were unhappy with his pro-science stance. See NCCIH. So, yes, politics is important here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
